Commit Graph

429 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Oli Scherer
ee3c835018 Always import all tracing macros for the entire crate instead of piecemeal by module 2022-09-01 14:54:27 +00:00
bors
eac6c33bc6 Auto merge of #100869 - nnethercote:replace-ThinVec, r=spastorino
Replace `rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec` with `thin_vec::ThinVec`

`rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec` looks like this:
```
pub struct ThinVec<T>(Option<Box<Vec<T>>>);
```
It's just a zero word if the vector is empty, but requires two
allocations if it is non-empty. So it's only usable in cases where the
vector is empty most of the time.

This commit removes it in favour of `thin_vec::ThinVec`, which is also
word-sized, but stores the length and capacity in the same allocation as
the elements. It's good in a wider variety of situation, e.g. in enum
variants where the vector is usually/always non-empty.

The commit also:
- Sorts some `Cargo.toml` dependency lists, to make additions easier.
- Sorts some `use` item lists, to make additions easier.
- Changes `clean_trait_ref_with_bindings` to take a
  `ThinVec<TypeBinding>` rather than a `&[TypeBinding]`, because this
  avoid some unnecessary allocations.

r? `@spastorino`
2022-09-01 08:01:06 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
e5356712b9
Rollup merge of #101165 - ldm0:drain_to_iter, r=cjgillot
Use more `into_iter` rather than `drain(..)`

Clearer semantic.
2022-08-31 21:30:13 +02:00
Donough Liu
97b1a6146c Use more into_iter rather than drain(..) 2022-08-30 04:42:03 +01:00
Nilstrieb
d1ef8180f9 Revert let_chains stabilization
This reverts commit 3266460749.

This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.
2022-08-29 19:34:11 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
78f83f0b46 Inline attrs. 2022-08-29 20:25:48 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
b38106b6d8 Replace rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec with thin_vec::ThinVec.
`rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec` looks like this:
```
pub struct ThinVec<T>(Option<Box<Vec<T>>>);
```
It's just a zero word if the vector is empty, but requires two
allocations if it is non-empty. So it's only usable in cases where the
vector is empty most of the time.

This commit removes it in favour of `thin_vec::ThinVec`, which is also
word-sized, but stores the length and capacity in the same allocation as
the elements. It's good in a wider variety of situation, e.g. in enum
variants where the vector is usually/always non-empty.

The commit also:
- Sorts some `Cargo.toml` dependency lists, to make additions easier.
- Sorts some `use` item lists, to make additions easier.
- Changes `clean_trait_ref_with_bindings` to take a
  `ThinVec<TypeBinding>` rather than a `&[TypeBinding]`, because this
  avoid some unnecessary allocations.
2022-08-29 15:42:13 +10:00
Yuki Okushi
d4a5ec17a7
Rollup merge of #100978 - nnethercote:fix-100948, r=petrochenkov
Handle `Err` in `ast::LitKind::to_token_lit`.

Fixes #100948.

r? ``@petrochenkov``
2022-08-26 09:51:46 +09:00
Nicholas Nethercote
b997af95fc Handle Err in ast::LitKind::to_token_lit.
Fixes #100948.
2022-08-25 10:50:39 +10:00
Yuki Okushi
f4550a6edf
Rollup merge of #99332 - jyn514:stabilize-label-break-value, r=petrochenkov
Stabilize `#![feature(label_break_value)]`

See the stabilization report in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1186213313.
2022-08-25 08:50:54 +09:00
Joshua Nelson
31e39446ec Stabilize #![feature(label_break_value)]
# Stabilization proposal

The feature was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50045 by est31 and has been in nightly since 2018-05-16 (over 4 years now).
There are [no open issues][issue-label] other than the tracking issue. There is a strong consensus that `break` is the right keyword and we should not use `return`.

There have been several concerns raised about this feature on the tracking issue (other than the one about tests, which has been fixed, and an interaction with try blocks, which has been fixed).
1. nrc's original comment about cost-benefit analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422235234
2. joshtriplett's comments about seeing use cases: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422281176
3. withoutboats's comments that Rust does not need more control flow constructs: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450050630

Many different examples of code that's simpler using this feature have been provided:
- A lexer by rpjohnst which must repeat code without label-break-value: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422502014
- A snippet by SergioBenitez which avoids using a new function and adding several new return points to a function: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-427628251. This particular case would also work if `try` blocks were stabilized (at the cost of making the code harder to optimize).
- Several examples by JohnBSmith: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-434651395
- Several examples by Centril: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-440154733
- An example by petrochenkov where this is used in the compiler itself to avoid duplicating error checking code: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-443557569
- Amanieu recently provided another example related to complex conditions, where try blocks would not have helped: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1184213006

Additionally, petrochenkov notes that this is strictly more powerful than labelled loops due to macros which accidentally exit a loop instead of being consumed by the macro matchers: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450246249

nrc later resolved their concern, mostly because of the aforementioned macro problems.
joshtriplett suggested that macros could be able to generate IR directly
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-451685983) but there are no open RFCs,
and the design space seems rather speculative.

joshtriplett later resolved his concerns, due to a symmetry between this feature and existing labelled break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-632960804

withoutboats has regrettably left the language team.

joshtriplett later posted that the lang team would consider starting an FCP given a stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1111269353

[issue-label]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AF-label_break_value+

 ## Report

+ Feature gate:
    - d695a497bb/src/test/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-label_break_value.rs
+ Diagnostics:
    - 6b2d3d5f3c/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs (L2629)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L749)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L1001)
    - 111df9e6ed/compiler/rustc_passes/src/loops.rs (L254)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L2079)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L1569)
+ Tests:
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_continue.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_unlabeled_break.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_illegal_uses.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint/unused_labels.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/run-pass/for-loop-while/label_break_value.rs

 ## Interactions with other features

Labels follow the hygiene of local variables.

label-break-value is permitted within `try` blocks:
```rust
let _: Result<(), ()> = try {
    'foo: {
        Err(())?;
        break 'foo;
    }
};
```

label-break-value is disallowed within closures, generators, and async blocks:
```rust
'a: {
    || break 'a
    //~^ ERROR use of unreachable label `'a`
    //~| ERROR `break` inside of a closure
}
```

label-break-value is disallowed on [_BlockExpression_]; it can only occur as a [_LoopExpression_]:
```rust
fn labeled_match() {
    match false 'b: { //~ ERROR block label not supported here
        _ => {}
    }
}

macro_rules! m {
    ($b:block) => {
        'lab: $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        unsafe $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        |x: u8| -> () $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
    }
}

fn foo() {
    m!({});
}
```

[_BlockExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/block-expr.html
[_LoopExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html
2022-08-23 21:14:12 -05:00
Dylan DPC
28ead17745
Rollup merge of #100909 - nnethercote:minor-ast-LitKind-improvement, r=petrochenkov
Minor `ast::LitKind` improvements

r? `@petrochenkov`
2022-08-23 20:40:09 +05:30
Nicholas Nethercote
6087dc2054 Remove the symbol from ast::LitKind::Err.
Because it's never used meaningfully.
2022-08-23 16:56:24 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
fb5dc6b3e7 Add some useful comments to LitKind. 2022-08-23 16:56:23 +10:00
Matthias Krüger
54d0f50677
Rollup merge of #100565 - TaKO8Ki:suggest-adding-missing-semicolon-before-item, r=compiler-errors
Suggest adding a missing semicolon before an item

fixes #100533
2022-08-23 06:55:24 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
619b8abaa6 Use AttrVec in more places.
In some places we use `Vec<Attribute>` and some places we use
`ThinVec<Attribute>` (a.k.a. `AttrVec`). This results in various points
where we have to convert between `Vec` and `ThinVec`.

This commit changes the places that use `Vec<Attribute>` to use
`AttrVec`. A lot of this is mechanical and boring, but there are
some interesting parts:
- It adds a few new methods to `ThinVec`.
- It implements `MapInPlace` for `ThinVec`, and introduces a macro to
  avoid the repetition of this trait for `Vec`, `SmallVec`, and
  `ThinVec`.

Overall, it makes the code a little nicer, and has little effect on
performance. But it is a precursor to removing
`rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec` and replacing it with
`thin_vec::ThinVec`, which is implemented more efficiently.
2022-08-22 07:35:33 +10:00
bors
dd01122b5c Auto merge of #100564 - nnethercote:box-ast-MacCall, r=spastorino
Box the `MacCall` in various types.

r? `@spastorino`
2022-08-20 10:26:54 +00:00
5225225
09ea9f0a87 Add diagnostic translation lints to crates that don't emit them 2022-08-18 19:29:02 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
d5dca26a94
Rollup merge of #100018 - nnethercote:clean-up-LitKind, r=petrochenkov
Clean up `LitKind`

r? ``@petrochenkov``
2022-08-17 12:32:49 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
eafd0dfd05 Box the MacCall in various types. 2022-08-17 08:10:56 +10:00
Dylan DPC
2e78db3858
Rollup merge of #100610 - nnethercote:ast-and-parser-tweaks, r=spastorino
Ast and parser tweaks

r? `@spastorino`
2022-08-16 18:16:13 +05:30
Nicholas Nethercote
5d3cc1713a Rename some things related to literals.
- Rename `ast::Lit::token` as `ast::Lit::token_lit`, because its type is
  `token::Lit`, which is not a token. (This has been confusing me for a
  long time.)
  reasonable because we have an `ast::token::Lit` inside an `ast::Lit`.
- Rename `LitKind::{from,to}_lit_token` as
  `LitKind::{from,to}_token_lit`, to match the above change and
  `token::Lit`.
2022-08-16 13:41:34 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
3308627016 Add some more AST node size assertions.
There is some redundancy here, but the extra assertions make it easier
to keep track of relative things, e.g. `ExprKind` is the biggest part
of `Expr`.
2022-08-16 13:01:29 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
3e04fed6fa Remove {ast,hir}::WhereEqPredicate::id.
These fields are unused.
2022-08-16 12:13:23 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
7d1e5a485c Avoid code duplication in {MetaItem,MetaItemKind}::value_str.
The two methods are almost identical.
2022-08-16 11:17:14 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
85a6cd6a47 Shrink ast::Attribute. 2022-08-16 11:10:13 +10:00
Takayuki Maeda
40dcf89a26 suggest adding a missing semicolon before an item 2022-08-15 16:10:31 +09:00
Mark Rousskov
154a09dd91 Adjust cfgs 2022-08-12 16:28:15 -04:00
Matthias Krüger
8237efc52d
Rollup merge of #100392 - nnethercote:simplify-visitors, r=cjgillot
Simplify visitors

By removing some unused arguments.

r? `@cjgillot`
2022-08-11 22:53:08 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
6ae0414122
Rollup merge of #100350 - jhpratt:stringify-vis, r=cjgillot
Stringify non-shorthand visibility correctly

This makes `stringify!(pub(in crate))` evaluate to `pub(in crate)` rather than `pub(crate)`, matching the behavior before the `crate` shorthand was removed. Further, this changes `stringify!(pub(in super))` to evaluate to `pub(in super)` rather than the current `pub(super)`. If the latter is not desired (it is _technically_ breaking), it can be undone.

Fixes #99981

`@rustbot` label +C-bug +regression-from-stable-to-beta +T-compiler
2022-08-11 22:53:06 +02:00
Dylan DPC
bc0f9e39f4
Rollup merge of #100391 - nnethercote:improve-size-assertions, r=lqd
Improve size assertions

r? `@lqd`
2022-08-11 22:47:05 +05:30
Nicholas Nethercote
232bd80130 Simplify rustc_ast::visit::Visitor::visit_poly_trait_ref.
It is passed an argument that is never used.
2022-08-11 11:10:01 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
421125f30a Simplify rustc_ast::visit::Visitor::visit_enum_def.
It's passed three arguments that are never used.
2022-08-11 10:54:01 +10:00
Camille GILLOT
9701845287 Do not consider method call receiver as an argument in AST. 2022-08-10 18:34:54 +02:00
Jacob Pratt
be5672ecb2
Stringify non-shorthand visibility correctly 2022-08-09 23:31:45 -04:00
Nicholas Nethercote
0658e8cbca Add a couple more AST node size assertions. 2022-08-10 11:51:22 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
574ba831d4 Avoid repeating qualifiers on static_assert_size calls.
Some of these don't need a `use` statement because there is already a
`#[macro_use] extern crate rustc_data_structures` item in the crate.
2022-08-10 11:51:21 +10:00
Santiago Pastorino
4f334f2b97
Move LifetimeCollectVisitor to rustc_ast_lowering 2022-08-04 11:26:54 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
cda2c04592
Explicitly gather lifetimes and definitions in RPIT 2022-08-04 11:26:51 -03:00
bors
c9e134e1b6 Auto merge of #100024 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-36ab4wx, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #99340 (Fix ICE in Definitions::create_def)
 - #99629 (Improve `cannot move out of` error message)
 - #99864 (bootstrap: don't emit warn about duplicated deps with same/different features if some of sets actually empty)
 - #99911 (Remove some uses of `guess_head_span`)
 - #99976 (Make Rustdoc exit with correct error code when scraping examples from invalid files)
 - #100003 (Improve size assertions.)
 - #100012 (Avoid `Ty` to `String` conversions)
 - #100020 (better error when python is not found in x - issue #99648)

Failed merges:

 - #99994 (Replace `guess_head_span` with `opt_span`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-01 15:40:43 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
9037ebba0c Improve size assertions.
- For any file with four or more size assertions, move them into a
  separate module (as is already done for `hir.rs`).
- Add some more for AST nodes and THIR nodes.
- Put the `hir.rs` ones in alphabetical order.
2022-08-01 09:15:05 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
99f5c79d64 Shrink Token.
From 72 bytes to 12 bytes (on x86-64).

There are two parts to this:
- Changing various source code offsets from 64-bit to 32-bit. This is
  not a problem because the rest of rustc also uses 32-bit source code
  offsets. This means `Token` is no longer `Copy` but this causes no
  problems.
- Removing the `RawStrError` from `LiteralKind`. Raw string literal
  invalidity is now indicated by a `None` value within
  `RawStr`/`RawByteStr`, and the new `validate_raw_str` function can be
  used to re-lex an invalid raw string literal to get the `RawStrError`.

There is one very small change in behaviour. Previously, if a raw string
literal matched both the `InvalidStarter` and `TooManyHashes` cases,
the latter would override the former. This has now changed, because
`raw_double_quoted_string` now uses `?` and so returns immediately upon
detecting the `InvalidStarter` case. I think this is a slight
improvement to report the earlier-detected error, and it explains the
change in the `test_too_many_hashes` test.

The commit also removes a couple of comments that refer to #77629 and
say that the size of these types don't affect performance. These
comments are wrong, though the performance effect is small.
2022-08-01 08:53:04 +10:00
bors
1202bbaf48 Auto merge of #99887 - nnethercote:rm-TreeAndSpacing, r=petrochenkov
Remove `TreeAndSpacing`.

A `TokenStream` contains a `Lrc<Vec<(TokenTree, Spacing)>>`. But this is
not quite right. `Spacing` makes sense for `TokenTree::Token`, but does
not make sense for `TokenTree::Delimited`, because a
`TokenTree::Delimited` cannot be joined with another `TokenTree`.

This commit fixes this problem, by adding `Spacing` to `TokenTree::Token`,
changing `TokenStream` to contain a `Lrc<Vec<TokenTree>>`, and removing the
`TreeAndSpacing` typedef.

The commit removes these two impls:
- `impl From<TokenTree> for TokenStream`
- `impl From<TokenTree> for TreeAndSpacing`

These were useful, but also resulted in code with many `.into()` calls
that was hard to read, particularly for anyone not highly familiar with
the relevant types. This commit makes some other changes to compensate:
- `TokenTree::token()` becomes `TokenTree::token_{alone,joint}()`.
- `TokenStream::token_{alone,joint}()` are added.
- `TokenStream::delimited` is added.

This results in things like this:
```rust
TokenTree::token(token::Semi, stmt.span).into()
```
changing to this:
```rust
TokenStream::token_alone(token::Semi, stmt.span)
```
This makes the type of the result, and its spacing, clearer.

These changes also simplifies `Cursor` and `CursorRef`, because they no longer
need to distinguish between `next` and `next_with_spacing`.

r? `@petrochenkov`
2022-07-30 14:50:05 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
332dffb1f9 Remove TreeAndSpacing.
A `TokenStream` contains a `Lrc<Vec<(TokenTree, Spacing)>>`. But this is
not quite right. `Spacing` makes sense for `TokenTree::Token`, but does
not make sense for `TokenTree::Delimited`, because a
`TokenTree::Delimited` cannot be joined with another `TokenTree`.

This commit fixes this problem, by adding `Spacing` to `TokenTree::Token`,
changing `TokenStream` to contain a `Lrc<Vec<TokenTree>>`, and removing the
`TreeAndSpacing` typedef.

The commit removes these two impls:
- `impl From<TokenTree> for TokenStream`
- `impl From<TokenTree> for TreeAndSpacing`

These were useful, but also resulted in code with many `.into()` calls
that was hard to read, particularly for anyone not highly familiar with
the relevant types. This commit makes some other changes to compensate:
- `TokenTree::token()` becomes `TokenTree::token_{alone,joint}()`.
- `TokenStream::token_{alone,joint}()` are added.
- `TokenStream::delimited` is added.

This results in things like this:
```rust
TokenTree::token(token::Semi, stmt.span).into()
```
changing to this:
```rust
TokenStream::token_alone(token::Semi, stmt.span)
```
This makes the type of the result, and its spacing, clearer.

These changes also simplifies `Cursor` and `CursorRef`, because they no longer
need to distinguish between `next` and `next_with_spacing`.
2022-07-29 15:52:15 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
6dced80b86 Remove visit_name from the AST visitor.
Because the default is empty and it's never overridden. This means
`walk_ident` can also be removed, because it does nothing.
2022-07-29 15:28:32 +10:00
Caio
3266460749 Stabilize let_chains 2022-07-16 20:17:58 -03:00
Maybe Waffle
d2923b4007 Add back expr size checks 2022-07-12 21:00:13 +04:00
Maybe Waffle
c2dbd62c7c Lower closure binders to hir & properly check them 2022-07-12 21:00:03 +04:00
Maybe Waffle
f89ef3cf66 Comment out expr size check 2022-07-12 16:26:08 +04:00
Maybe Waffle
40ae7b5b8e Parse closure binders
This is first step in implementing RFC 3216.
- Parse `for<'a>` before closures in ast
  - Error in lowering
- Add `closure_lifetime_binder` feature
2022-07-12 16:25:16 +04:00