[on-demand] Turn monomorphic_const_eval into a proper query, not just a cache.
The error definitions and reporting logic, alongside with `eval_length` were moved to `librustc`.
Both local and cross-crate constant evaluation is on-demand now, but the latter is only used for `enum` discriminants, to replace the manual insertion into the cache which was done when decoding variants.
r? @nikomatsakis
Rename compiler_barrier to compiler_fence
This addresses concerns raised following the merge of #41092. Specifically:
> The naming of these seems surprising: the multithreaded functions (and both the single and multithreaded intrinsics themselves) are fences, but this is a barrier. It's not incorrect, but the latter is both inconsistent with the existing functions and slightly confusing with another type in std (e.g., `Barrier`).
`compiler_fence` carries the same semantic implication that this is a compiler-only operation, while being more in line with the fence/barrier concepts already in use in `std`.
Hoedown big comeback!
```bash
> cargo +local test
Compiling libc v0.2.20
Compiling sysinfo v0.3.4 (file:///Users/imperio/rust/sysinfo)
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 3.2 secs
Running target/debug/deps/disk_list-dbd70897f1f7e080
running 1 test
test test_disks ... ok
test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured
Running target/debug/deps/sysinfo-8ad11103abdf5941
running 0 tests
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured
Doc-tests sysinfo
WARNING: src/sysinfo.rs - (line 45) test will be run in the next rustdoc version. If it's not supposed to, please update your documentation and make it compliant to common mark specifications.
WARNING: src/sysinfo.rs - (line 48) test will be run in the next rustdoc version. If it's not supposed to, please update your documentation and make it compliant to common mark specifications.
running 1 test
test src/sysinfo.rs - (line 14) ... ok
test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured
```
r? @rust-lang/docs
:vis matcher for macro_rules
Resurrection of @DanielKeep's implementation posted with [RFC 1575](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1575).
@jseyfried was of the opinion that this doesn't need an RFC.
Needed before merge:
- [x] sign-off from @DanielKeep since I stole his code
- [x] feature gate
- [x] docs
Add a comment for disabling errexit, try to debug appveyor cache
Comments added as requested.
Also, lets add some cache debugging to appveyor. I *think* this is how to ignore errors in cmd.exe (and I did try it on my own machine), but I'm not 100% sure how appveyor runs them. In the worst case it'll fail but I guess that isn't the end of the world since the build has already failed by this point.
r? @TimNN
Specialize Vec::from_elem to use calloc
Fixes#38723. This specializes the implementation for `u8` only, but it could be extended to other zeroable types if desired.
I haven't tested this extensively, but I did verify that it gives the expected performance boost for large `vec![0; n]` allocations with both alloc_system and jemalloc, on Linux. (I have not tested or even built the Windows code.)
[rustbuild] Side-step HashMap iteration to preserve command-line step order.
The new `HashMap` was introduced by #41227 and it accidentally randomized step order.
r? @alexcrichton
rustc: provide adt_sized_constraint as an on-demand query.
By using `queries::adt_sized_constraint::try_get`, we can detect cycles without a separate stack.
r? @nikomatsakis
add 'mir' to rustc help menu and man doc
add 'mir' to '--emit' flag list for 'rustc'.
This is added because 'rustc' can now generate MIR (referencing to
"Teach rustc --emit=mir #39891").
Do not desugar if-let-else to match arm guards
Fixes#41272
Changed the desugaring code
**Before**
```rust
match <sub_expr> {
<pat> => <body>,
[_ if <else_opt_if_cond> => <else_opt_if_body>,]
_ => [<else_opt> | ()]
}
```
**After**
```rust
match <sub_expr> {
<pat> => <body>,
_ => [<else_opt> | ()]
}
```
With this fix, it doesn't cause E0301
