doc: ffi referenced rust-snappy can not compile
r? @steveklabnik
The referenced code https://github.com/thestinger/rust-snappy can not work. Maybe it's the old rust version? I do not know.
So I try to rewrite these test cases. If it is not what you originally meaning, just ignored it.
doc: Mention that writeln! and println! always use LF
Fixes#34697
I'm not really satisfied with the wording, but I didn't have a better idea. Suggestions welcome.
Improve arc doc, fixing #32905
As issue #32905 detailed, I moved part of the module doc to the struct doc, and fixed some small places in the `alloc::arc`.
rustbuild: doc fixes
This fixes two issues rustbuild currently has when building documentation:
1. It fixes standalone builds of `doc-test` and `doc-rustc`.
2. It actually builds the compiler docs if requested in the config.
Closes#34275.
Fixed issue where importing a trait method directly and then calling the method causes a compiler panic
The code below triggers the panic, and is included in a new regression test.
```rust
trait Foo {
fn foo();
}
use Foo::foo;
fn main() {
foo();
}
```
The bug is caused by `librustc_resolve` allowing the illegal binding to be imported even after displaying the error message above.
The fix amounts to importing a dummy binding (`rustc::hir::def::Def::Err`) instead of the actual trait method.
test: Remove NOTE assertions from trace_macros-gate
If no NOTE assertions are present I believe they aren't asserted at all, and it
looks like the number of NOTEs differs on distcheck vs `make check`, so let's
just remove them all.
Closes#18154
If no NOTE assertions are present I believe they aren't asserted at all, and it
looks like the number of NOTEs differs on distcheck vs `make check`, so let's
just remove them all.
Closes#18154
Mention the crate type cdylib in rustc's usage
Hello,
I just tried to build a `cdylib` with the latest stable release, I've been passively waiting for this for quite some time now. Tested successfully on my machine, although it doesn't appear in `rustc`'s usage it seems to work like a charm so far. 😀
Thanks!
std: fix `readdir` errors for solaris
A `NULL` from `readdir` could be the end of stream or an error. The only
way to know is to check `errno`, so it must be set to a known value first,
like a 0 that POSIX will never use.
This currently only matters for solaris targets, as the other unix platforms
are using `readdir_r` with a direct error return indication. However, this is
getting deprecated (#34668) so they should all eventually switch to `readdir`.
This PR adds `set_errno`, uses it to clear the value before calling `readdir`,
then checks it again after to see the reason for a `NULL`. A few other small
fixes are included just to get solaris compiling at all.
I couldn't get cross-compilation completely going, so I don't have a good way
to test this beyond a smoke-test cargo build of std. I'd appreciate input from
someone more familiar with solaris -- cc @nbaksalyar?
evaluate the array length of fixed size array types in rustdoc
mitgates #34579
to fix it we'd need an expression simplifier.
r? @steveklabnik
cc @Osspial
Ergonomic format_args!
Fixes#9456 (at last).
Not a ground-up rewrite of the existing machinery, but more like an added intermediary layer between macro arguments and format placeholders. This is now implementing Rust RFC 1618!
This commit removed the restriction of only allowing one type per argument.
This is achieved by adding mappings between macro arguments and format
placeholders, then taking the mapping into consideration when emitting
the Arguments expression.
syntax_ext: format: fix implicit positional arguments
syntax_ext: format: don't panic if no args given for implicit positional args
Check the list lengths before use.
Fixes regression of `compile-fail/macro-backtrace-println.rs`.
syntax_ext: format: also map CountIsParam indices to expanded args
syntax_ext: format: fix ICE in case of malformed format args
Converts named argument references into indices, right after
verification as suggested by @alexcrichton. This drastically simplifies
the whole process!
format: beautifully get rid of ArgumentNext and CountIsNextParam
Now that CountIsNextParam and ArgumentNext are resolved during parse,
the need for handling them outside of libfmt_macros is obviated.
Note: *one* instance of implicit reference handling still remains, and
that's for implementing `all_args_simple`. It's trivial enough though,
so in this case it may be tolerable.
r? @steveklabnik
The referenced code https://github.com/thestinger/rust-snappy can not work. Maybe it's the old rust version? I do not know.
So I try to rewrite these test cases. If it is not what you originally meaning, just ignored it.
Fix bugs in macro-expanded statement parsing
Fixes#34543.
This is a [breaking-change]. For example, the following would break:
```rust
macro_rules! m { () => {
println!("") println!("")
//^ Semicolons are now required on macro-expanded non-braced macro invocations
//| in statement positions.
let x = 0
//^ Semicolons are now required on macro-expanded `let` statements
//| that are followed by more statements, so this would break.
let y = 0 //< (this would still be allowed to reduce breakage in the wild)
}
fn main() { m!() }
```
r? @eddyb
Mutex and RwLock need RefUnwindSafe too
Incomplete, because I don't know what the appropriate stability annotation is here, but this is an attempt to bring the documentation for `std::panic` in line with reality. Right now, it says:
>Types like `&Mutex<T>`, however, are unwind safe because they implement poisoning by default.
But only `Mutex<T>`, not `&Mutex<T>`, is unwind-safe.
```rust
macro_rules! m { () => { let x = 1; x } }
macro_rules! n { () => {
m!() //< This can now expand into statements
}}
fn main() { n!(); }
```
and revert needless fallout fixes.
Mark Ipv4Addr is_unspecified as stable and provide reference.
Per [#27709 (comment)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27709#issuecomment-231280999), no RFC is needed here.
IPv4 "unspecified" has been defined in [Stevens], and has been part of the IPv4 stack for quite some time. This property should become stable, since this use of 0.0.0.0 is not going anywhere.
[Stevens][_UNIX Network Programming Volume 1, Second Edition_. Stevens, W. Richard. Prentice-Hall, 1998. p. 891]
Please let me know if I got the rustdoc wrong or something. I tried to be as terse as possible while still conveying the appropriate information.
This also has a slight impact on PR #34694, but that one came first, so this shouldn't block it, IMO.
std: Clean out deprecated APIs
This primarily removes a lot of `sync::Static*` APIs and rejiggers the
associated implementations. While doing this it was discovered that the
`is_poisoned` method can actually result in a data race for the Mutex/RwLock
primitives, so the inner `Cell<bool>` was changed to an `AtomicBool` to prevent
the associated data race. Otherwise the usage/gurantees should be the same
they were before.
