This commit implements both the native linking modifiers infrastructure
as well as an initial attempt at the individual modifiers from the RFC.
It also introduces a feature flag for the general syntax along with
individual feature flags for each modifier.
This defers backtrace formatting to the point where we
actually want to flush delayed diagnostics. If they are discarded
before that point then we can avoid invoking the backtrace formatting
machinery which will parse debug info and symbol tables.
for debuginfo=2 this leads to a 20% walltime reduction of the UI testsuite
Do not ICE on invalid const param
When encountering a path that can't have generics, do not call
`generics_of`. This would happen when writing something like
`path::this_is_a_mod<const_val>`.
Fix#84831.
Remove `rustc_middle::mir::interpret::CheckInAllocMsg::NullPointerTest`
Removing it per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84842#discussion_r625589674: it's a dead enum variant.
Note that `PointerArithmeticTest` also seems dead:
```
$ rg -F PointerArithmeticTest -C5
compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/error.rs
169-
170-/// Details of why a pointer had to be in-bounds.
171-#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone, TyEncodable, TyDecodable, HashStable)]
172-pub enum CheckInAllocMsg {
173- MemoryAccessTest,
174: PointerArithmeticTest,
175- InboundsTest,
176-}
177-
178-impl fmt::Display for CheckInAllocMsg {
179- /// When this is printed as an error the context looks like this
--
182- write!(
183- f,
184- "{}",
185- match *self {
186- CheckInAllocMsg::MemoryAccessTest => "memory access",
187: CheckInAllocMsg::PointerArithmeticTest => "pointer arithmetic",
188- CheckInAllocMsg::InboundsTest => "inbounds test",
189- }
190- )
191- }
192-}
```
Not sure if that is also desirable to be removed, however.
using allow_internal_unstable (as recommended)
Fixes: #84836
```shell
$ ./build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc src/test/run-make-fulldeps/coverage/no_cov_crate.rs
error[E0554]: `#![feature]` may not be used on the dev release channel
--> src/test/run-make-fulldeps/coverage/no_cov_crate.rs:2:1
|
2 | #![feature(no_coverage)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0554`.
```
Deduplicate native libs before they are passed to the linker
Stop spamming the linker with the same native library over and over again, if they directly follow from each other. This would help prevent [this situation](https://github.com/MSxDOS/ntapi/issues/2).
Issue #38460 has been open since 2016 so I think it's worth making an incomplete fix that at least addresses the most common symptom and without otherwise changing how Rust handles native libs. This PR is intended to be easy to revert (if necessary) when a more permanent fix is implemented.
Retain data in vectorized registers for longer
This seems to be a mild performance improvement on the keccak crate at least, though not sure it'll show up more broadly.
When encountering a path that can't have generics, do not call
`generics_of`. This would happen when writing something like
`path::this_is_a_mod<const_val>`.
Fix#84831.
Update BARE_TRAIT_OBJECT and ELLIPSIS_INCLUSIVE_RANGE_PATTERNS to errors in Rust 2021
This addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81244 by updating two lints to errors in the Rust 2021 edition.
r? `@estebank`
- It's used exactly once, so it's trivial to replace
- It doesn't match the normal convention for containers: normally
`get()` returns and option and indexing panics. Instead `get()` panicked
and there's no indexing operation available.
This extracts a new `parse_cfg` function that's used between both.
- Treat `#[doc(cfg(x), cfg(y))]` the same as `#[doc(cfg(x)]
#[doc(cfg(y))]`. Previously it would be completely ignored.
- Treat `#[doc(inline, cfg(x))]` the same as `#[doc(inline)]
#[doc(cfg(x))]`. Previously, the cfg would be ignored.
- Pass the cfg predicate through to rustc_expand to be validated
Co-authored-by: Vadim Petrochenkov <vadim.petrochenkov@gmail.com>
Replace 'NULL' with 'null'
This replaces occurrences of "NULL" with "null" in docs, comments, and compiler error/lint messages. This is for the sake of consistency, as the lowercase "null" is already the dominant form in Rust. The all-caps NULL looks like the C macro (or SQL keyword), which seems out of place in a Rust context, given that NULL does not exist in the Rust language or standard library (instead having [`ptr::null()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ptr/fn.null.html)).
