Properly re-use def path hash in incremental mode
Fixes#79661
In incremental compilation mode, we update a `DefPathHash -> DefId`
mapping every time we create a `DepNode` for a foreign `DefId`.
This mapping is written out to the on-disk incremental cache, and is
read by the next compilation session to allow us to lazily decode
`DefId`s.
When we decode a `DepNode` from the current incremental cache, we need
to ensure that any previously-recorded `DefPathHash -> DefId` mapping
gets recorded in the new mapping that we write out. However, PR #74967
didn't do this in all cases, leading to us being unable to decode a
`DefPathHash` in certain circumstances.
This PR refactors some of the code around `DepNode` deserialization to
prevent this kind of mistake from happening again.
Also generate `StorageDead` in constants
r? `@eddyb`
None of this special casing is actually necessary since we started promoting within constants and statics.
We may want to keep some of it around out of perf reasons, but it's not required for user visible behaviour
somewhat related: #68622
remove this weird special case from promotion
Promotion has a special case to ignore interior mutability under some specific circumstances. The purpose of this PR is to figure out what changes if we remove that. Since `Cell::new` and friends only get promoted inside `const`/`static` initializers these days, it actually is not easy to exploit this case: you need something like
```rust
const TEST_INTERIOR_MUT: () = {
// The "0." case is already ruled out by not permitting any interior mutability in `const`.
let _val: &'static _ = &(Cell::new(1), 2).1;
};
```
I assume something like `&Some(&(Cell::new(1), 2).1)` would hit the nested case inside `validate_rvalue`... though I am not sure why that would not just trigger nested promotion, first promoting the inner reference and then the outer one?
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67534 (by simply rejecting that code^^)
r? `@oli-obk` (but for now this is not meant to be merged!)
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
Don't time `emit_ignored_resolution_errors`
This printed several hundred lines each time rustdoc was run, almost all
of which rounded to 0.000. Since this isn't useful info, don't print it
everywhere, so other perf info is easier to read.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Use is_write_vectored to optimize the write_vectored implementation for BufWriter
In case when the underlying writer does not have an efficient implementation `write_vectored`, the present implementation of
`write_vectored` for `BufWriter` may still forward vectored writes directly to the writer depending on the total length of the data. This misses the advantage of buffering, as the actually written slice may be small.
Provide an alternative code path for the non-vectored case, where the slices passed to `BufWriter` are coalesced in the buffer before being flushed to the underlying writer with plain `write` calls. The buffer is only bypassed if an individual slice's length is at least as large as the buffer.
Remove a FIXME comment referring to #72919 as the issue has been closed with an explanation provided.
Compress RWU from at least 32 bits to 4 bits
The liveness uses a mixed representation of RWUs based on the
observation that most of them have invalid reader and invalid
writer. The packed variant uses 32 bits and unpacked 96 bits.
Unpacked data contains reader live node and writer live node.
Since live nodes are used only to determine their validity,
RWUs can always be stored in a packed form with four bits for
each: reader bit, writer bit, used bit, and one extra padding
bit to simplify packing and unpacking operations.
Replace simple `if let` constructs with Option::map
Replaces a few constructs of the form
```
if let Some(x) = var {
Some(...)
} else {
None
}
```
with calls to `Option::map`.
`@rustbot` modify labels +C-cleanup +T-compiler
Use `summary_opts()` in another spot
I added `summary_opts()` before I cut the branch for #77686 (2 months
ago!), so this "slipped through the cracks".
Validate naked functions definitions
Validate that naked functions are defined in terms of a single inline assembly
block that uses only `const` and `sym` operands and has `noreturn` option.
Implemented as future incompatibility lint with intention to migrate it into
hard error. When it becomes a hard error it will ensure that naked functions are
either unsafe or contain an unsafe block around the inline assembly. It will
guarantee that naked functions do not reference functions parameters (obsoleting
part of existing checks from #79411). It will limit the definitions of naked
functions to what can be reliably supported. It will also reject naked functions
implemented using legacy LLVM style assembly since it cannot satisfy those
conditions.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2774https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2972
Fix SGX CI, take 3
Broken in #79038
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
I actually ran `./x.py test --target x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` on the commit before submitting it this time.
Update Clippy
Biweekly Clippy update (which I forgot about on Thursday)
This includes a `Cargo.lock` update, so probably needs `rollup=never`.
r? `@Manishearth`
extend `WithOptConstParam` docs, move rustdoc test
This should hopefully make things a bit clearer, feel free to comment on anything which can still be improved.
cc `@ecstatic-morse` `@nikomatsakis` `@RalfJung`
Const parameters can not be inferred with `_` help note
This should close: #79557
# Example output
```
error[E0747]: type provided when a constant was expected
--> inferred_const_note.rs:6:19
|
6 | let a = foo::<_, 2>([0, 1, 2]);
| ^
|
= help: Const parameters can not be inferred with `_`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0747`.
```
r? `@lcnr`
Added a lint-fraction-readability flag to the configuration
This adds an option to disable the `unreadable_literal` lint for floats with a longer fraction. This allows users to write `0.100200300` without getting a warning. Fixes#4176
I have some open questions about this PR:
1. I've named the option `lint-fraction-readability` is this a good name or should I rename it to something else?
2. What should the default configuration value be?
* The current default value is `true` as this was also the previous default.
3. Do I have to document this new option somewhere else or will it be extracted from the code comment?
4. The current fix option will also rewrite the fraction if the integer part violates the `unreadable_literal` lint it would otherwise also trigger the `inconsistent_digit_grouping` lint. Is this also okay?
* `1.100200300` will be unaffected by the fix function
* `100200300.100200300` will be effected and fixed to `100_200_300.100_200_300`
---
The project needed some getting used to but I'm happy with the result. A big thank you to `@flip1995` for giving me some pointers for this implementation and to everyone for the great introduction documentation!
---
changelog: Added the `unreadable-literal-lint-fractions` configuration to disable the `unreadable_literal` lint for fractions
Update RLS and Rustfmt
Fixes#79406Fixes#79407
This does pull 1.4.28 version of Rustfmt. Do you want me to pull the 1.4.29 while we're at it?
r? `@calebcartwright`
Fix incorrect io::Take's limit resulting from io::copy specialization
The specialization introduced in #75272 fails to update `io::Take` wrappers after performing the copy syscalls which bypass those wrappers. The buffer flushing before the copy does update them correctly, but the bytes copied after the initial flush weren't subtracted.
The fix is to subtract the bytes copied from each `Take` in the chain of wrappers, even when an error occurs during the syscall loop. To do so the `CopyResult` enum now has to carry the bytes copied so far in the error case.
The liveness uses a mixed representation of RWUs based on the
observation that most of them have invalid reader and invalid
writer. The packed variant uses 32 bits and unpacked 96 bits.
Unpacked data contains reader live node and writer live node.
Since live nodes are used only to determine their validity,
RWUs can always be stored in a packed form with four bits for
each: reader bit, writer bit, used bit, and one extra padding
bit to simplify packing and unpacking operations.
A slightly clearer diagnostic when misusing const
Fixes#79598
This produces the following diagnostic:
"expected one of `>`, a const expression, lifetime, or type, found keyword `const`"
Instead of the previous, more confusing:
"expected one of `>`, const, lifetime, or type, found keyword `const`"
This might not be completely clear as some users might not understand what a const expression is, but I do believe this is an improvement.
