4166: Defining a default target to support cross-compilation targets r=matklad a=FuriouZz
Related to #4163
Co-authored-by: Christophe MASSOLIN <christophe.massolin@gmail.com>
4306: Make incremental sync opt-out and fix line index rebuild r=matklad a=lnicola
4308: Update server binary paths in docs r=matklad a=Coder-256
Fixed incorrect macOS path and converted to a list. Also, should the Windows path include `matklad.rust-analyzer`? (I can't check)
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
Co-authored-by: Jacob Greenfield <jacob@jacobgreenfield.me>
No tests fail, and quick manual testing shows that there are no
false-positives. In general, each completion contributor should be
independent from the others.
4269: add support of use alias semantic in definition r=matklad a=bnjjj
close#4202
4293: no doctests for flycheck r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
4285: add support of cfg attributes on enum variants r=edwin0cheng a=bnjjj
close#4279
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
4286: Make incremental sync opt-in r=matklad a=lnicola
@matklad do you want to merge this? I'd make it opt-out, but it's fine to test it more.
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
4280: Add documents owner for ImplDef and SourceFile r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
When working on #3182, I found that `ImplDef` and `SourceFile` do not implemet `DocCommentsOwer` trait, and I tested it in `cargo doc` that `impl` could has some doc-comments.
I am not so sure about `SourceFile` case, but in theory if that file is a crate root, the doc comment of it should represent the whole crate documentation, right ?
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
4276: Don't count start of non-ASCII characters as being inside of them r=matklad a=lnicola
I'm still not sure that `utf16_to_utf8_col` is correct for code points from Supplementary Planes. These have two UTF-16 code units, and I feel we're not going to count them correctly.
Fixes the crash in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4263#issuecomment-622988258.
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
4207: Add unwrap block assist #4156 r=matklad a=bnjjj
close issue #4156
4253: Remove `workspaceLoaded` setting r=matklad a=eminence
The `workspaceLoaded` notification setting was originally designed to
control the display of a popup message that said:
"workspace loaded, {} rust packages"
This popup was removed and replaced by a much sleeker message in the
VSCode status bar that provides a real-time status while loading:
rust-analyzer: {}/{} packages
This was done as part of #3587
The change in this PR simply renames this setting from `workspaceLoaded` to
`progress` to better describe what it actually controls. At the moment,
the only type of progress message that is controlled by this setting is
the initial load messages, but in theory other messages could also be
controlled by this setting.
Reviewer notes:
* If we didn't like the idea of causing minor breaking to user's config, we could keep the setting name as `workspaceLoaded`
* I think we can now close both #2719 and #3176 since the notification dialog in question no longer exists (actually I think you can close those issues even if you reject this PR 😄 )
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Chin <achin@eminence32.net>
The `workspaceLoaded` notification setting was originally designed to
control the display of a popup message that said:
"workspace loaded, {} rust packages"
This popup was removed and replaced by a much sleeker message in the
VSCode status bar that provides a real-time status while loading:
rust-analyzer: {}/{} packages
This was done as part of #3587
The new status-bar indicator is unobtrusive and shouldn't need to be
disabled. So this setting is removed.
4244: Show unsafe trait in hover r=matklad a=DianaNites
Following on #2450 and #4210, for traits.
`unsafe` is the only qualifier they can have, though.
Co-authored-by: Diana <5275194+DianaNites@users.noreply.github.com>
4246: Validate uses of self and super r=matklad a=djrenren
This change follows on the validation of the `crate` keyword in paths. It verifies the following things:
`super`:
- May only be preceded by other `super` segments
- If in a `UseItem` then all semantically preceding paths also consist only of `super`
`self`
- May only be the start of a path
Just a note, a couple times while working on this I found myself really wanting a Visitor of some sort so that I could traverse descendants while skipping sub-trees that are unimportant. Iterators don't really work for this, so as you can see I reached for recursion. Considering paths are generally small a fancy debounced visitor probably isn't important but figured I'd say something in case we had something like this lying around and I wasn't using it.
Co-authored-by: John Renner <john@jrenner.net>
4153: Add support for incremental text synchronization r=matklad a=lnicola
Fixes#3762.
This still needs a `ra_vfs` PR, but I want to know I'm on the right track. I tested the change and it didn't crash horribly, but YMMV.
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
4227: Report invalid, nested, multi-segment crate-paths r=matklad a=djrenren
There was a bug in the previous path-validating code that didn't detect multi-segment paths that started with `crate`.
```rust
// Successfully reported
use foo::{crate};
// BUG: was not being reported
use foo::{crate::bar};
```
This was due to my confusion about path-associativity. That is, the path with no qualifier is the innermost path, not the outermost. I've updated the code with a lot of comments to explain what's going on.
This bug was discovered when I found an erroneous `ok` test which I reported here:
https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4226
This test now fails and has been modified, hopefully in the spirit of the original test, to be correct. Sorry about submitting the bug in the first place!
Co-authored-by: John Renner <john@jrenner.net>
4178: Validate the location of `crate` in paths r=matklad a=djrenren
**This solution does not fully handle `use` statements. See below**
This pull requests implements simple validation of usages of the `crate` keyword in `Path`s. Specifically it validates that:
- If a `PathSegment` is starts with the `crate` keyword, it is also the first segment of the `Path`
- All other usages of `crate` in `Path`s are considered errors.
This aligns with `rustc`'s rules. Unlike rustc this implementation does not issue a special error message in the case of `::crate` but it does catch the error.
Furthermore, this change does not cover all error cases. Specifically the following is not caught:
```rust
use foo::{crate}
```
This is because this check is context sensitive. From an AST perspective, `crate` is the root of the `Path`. Only by inspecting the full `UseItem` do we see that it is not in fact the root. This problem becomes worse because `UseTree`s are allowed to be arbitrarily nested:
```rust
use {crate, {{crate, foo::{crate}}}
```
So this is a hard problem to solve without essentially a breadth-first search. In a traditional compiler, I'd say this error is most easily found during the AST -> HIR conversion pass but within rust-analyzer I'm not sure where it belongs.
Under the implementation in this PR, such errors are ignored so we're *more correct* just not *entirely correct*.
Co-authored-by: John Renner <john@jrenner.net>
4119: Cache proc-macro dlls r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR try to fix a deadlock in proc-macro srv by not unloading dlls.
Currently we load and unload dlls for each request, however rustc TLS is leaky , such that if we do it a lot of times, all TLS index will be consumed and it will be deadlocked inside panic (it is because panic itself is using TLS too).
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
4204: Use specific pattern when translating if-let-else to match r=matklad a=matklad
We *probably* should actually use the same machinery here, as we do
for fill match arms, but just special-casing options and results seems
to be a good first step.
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
We *probably* should actually use the same machinery here, as we do
for fill match arms, but just special-casing options and results seems
to be a good first step.
4161: lsp-types 0.74 r=kjeremy a=kjeremy
* Fixes a bunch of param types to take partial progress into account.
* Will allow us to support insert/replace text in completions
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
