Re-add `From<f16> for f64`
This impl was originally added in #122470 before being removed in #123830 due to #123831. However, the issue only affects `f32` (which currently only has one `From<{float}>` impl, `From<f32>`) as `f64` already has two `From<{float}>` impls (`From<f32>` and `From<f64>`) and is also the float literal fallback type anyway. Therefore it is safe to re-add `From<f16> for f64`.
This PR also updates the FIXME link to point to the open issue #123831 rather than the closed issue #123824.
Tracking issue: #116909
`@rustbot` label +F-f16_and_f128 +T-libs-api
Refactor examples and enhance documentation in result.rs
- Replaced `map` with `map_err` in the error handling example for correctness
- Reordered example code to improve readability and logical flow
- Added assertions to examples to demonstrate expected outcomes
Invert comparison in `uN::checked_sub`
After #124114, LLVM no longer combines the comparison and subtraction in `uN::checked_sub` when either operand is a constant (demo: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/MaeoYbsP1). The difference is more pronounced when the expression is slightly more complex (https://rust.godbolt.org/z/4rPavsYdc).
This is due to the use of `>=` here:
ee97564e3a/library/core/src/num/uint_macros.rs (L581-L593)
For constant `C`, LLVM eagerly converts `a >= C` into `a > C - 1`, but the backend can only combine `a < C` with `a - C`, not `C - 1 < a` and `a - C`: e586556e37/llvm/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp (L1697-L1742)
This PR[^1] simply inverts the `>=` into `<` to restore the LLVM magic, and somewhat align this with the implementation of `uN::overflowing_sub` from #103299.
When the result is stored as an `Option` (rather than being branched/cmoved on), the discriminant is `self >= rhs`. This PR doesn't affect the codegen (and relevant tests) of that since LLVM will negate `self < rhs` to `self >= rhs` when necessary.
[^1]: Note to `self`: My very first contribution to publicly-used code. Hopefully like what I should learn to always be, tiny and humble.
Document proper usage of `fmt::Error` and `fmt()`'s `Result`.
I've seen several newcomers wonder why `fmt::Error` doesn't have any error detail information, or propose to return it in response to an error condition found inside a `impl fmt::Display for MyType`.
That is incorrect, per [a lone paragraph of the `fmt` module's documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.78.0/std/fmt/index.html#formatting-traits). However, users looking to implement a formatting trait won't necessarily look there. Therefore, let's add the critical information (that formatting per se is infallible) to all the involved items: every `fmt()` method, and `fmt::Error`.
This PR is not intended to make any novel claims about `fmt`; only to repeat an existing one in places where it will be more visible.
Remove feature from documentation examples
Add rustc_const_stable attribute to stabilized functions
Update intra-doc link for `u8::is_ascii_whitespace` on `&[u8]` functions
from_str_radix: outline only the panic function
In the `{integer}::from_str_radix` function, the radix check is labeled as `cold` and `inline(never)`, along with its corresponding panic. It probably was intended to apply these attributes only to the panic function.
Add benchmarks for `impl Debug for str`
In order to inform future perf improvements and prevent regressions, lets add some benchmarks that stress `impl Debug for str`.
---
As I am currently working on improving the perf in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121150, its nice to have these benchmarks.
Writing them, I also saw that escapes are written out one char at a time, even though other parts of the code are already optimizing that via `as_str`, which I intend to do as well as a followup improvement.
r? ``@cuviper``
☝🏻 as you were also assigned to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121150, CC ``@the8472`` if you want to steal the review :-)
Documentation of these properties previously existed in a lone paragraph
in the `fmt` module's documentation:
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.78.0/std/fmt/index.html#formatting-traits>
However, users looking to implement a formatting trait won't necessarily
look there. Therefore, let's add the critical information (that
formatting per se is infallible) to all the involved items.
Implement `as_chunks` with `split_at_unchecked`
We were discussing various ways to do [this on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/273534239310479360/273541522815713281/1236946363120619521), and in the process I noticed that <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/1P16P37Go> is emitting a panic path inside `as_chunks`. It optimizes out in release, but we could just not do that in the first place.
We're already doing unsafe code that depends on this value being calculated correctly, so might as well call `split_at_unchecked` instead of `split_at`.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #123344 (Remove braces when fixing a nested use tree into a single item)
- #124587 (Generic `NonZero` post-stabilization changes.)
- #124775 (crashes: add lastest batch of crash tests)
- #124869 (Make sure we don't deny macro vars w keyword names)
- #124876 (Simplify `use crate::rustc_foo::bar` occurrences.)
- #124892 (Update cc crate to v1.0.97)
- #124903 (Ignore empty RUSTC_WRAPPER in bootstrap)
- #124909 (Reapply the part of #124548 that bors forgot)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Avoid a cast in `ptr::slice_from_raw_parts(_mut)`
Casting to `*const ()` or `*mut ()` is no longer needed after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123840 so let's make the MIR smaller (and more inline-able, as seen in the tests).
If [ACP#362](https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/362) goes through we can keep calling `ptr::from_raw_parts(_mut)` in these also without the cast, but that hasn't had any libs-api attention yet, so I'm not waiting on it.
Correct the const stabilization of `last_chunk` for slices
`<[T]>::last_chunk` should have become const stable as part of <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117561>. Update the const stability gate to reflect this.
Add constants for f16 and f128
- Commit 1 adds associated constants for `f16`, excluding NaN and infinities as these are implemented using arithmetic for `f32` and `f64`.
- Commit 2 adds associated constants for `f128`, excluding NaN and infinities.
- Commit 3 adds constants in `std::f16::consts`.
- Commit 4 adds constants in `std::f128::consts`.
Casting to `*const ()` or `*mut ()` just bloats the MIR, so let's not.
If ACP#362 goes through we can keep calling `ptr::from_raw_parts(_mut)` in these also without the cast, but that hasn't had any libs-api attention yet, so I'm not waiting on it.
Document That `f16` And `f128` Hardware Support is Limited (v2)
This PR is identical to #123892, which was approved and merged but then removed from master by a force-push due to a [CI bug](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/ci.20broken.3F).
r? ghost
Original PR description:
---
This adds a small paragraph to the recently added f16 and f128 types explaining that hardware support may be limited, and that performance may suffer as a result of that.
I mainly wrote this because I felt it may be useful to express in some form; as a launchpoint for readers of the documentation if they have issues with performance.
I tried to word the documentation in a way that doesn't create false assumptions (that f16/f128 is too slow to use, for instance), removing the software implementation part could mislead people to thinking that f16/f128 is only available on some platforms, not all, so I believe it is important to keep in.\
"not all *major* platforms" is specifically said so as to not be redundant, because not all platforms implement many things, but the average rustacean is probably going to be using x86_64 or aarch64 derived ISA's, which is who this documentation is targeted towards.
I'm not sure of the best way to word the documentation, or if it should even be added, but I feel like it may be useful to have (potentially in a reworded way, I'm not very confident in the current wording and cannot decide if that is because it is too vague to be useful or too specific to be generally correct).
Co-authored-by: Jubilee <46493976+workingjubilee@users.noreply.github.com>
Update library/core/src/primitive_docs.rs
Remove orphaned doc link and clean up grammar a bit
Update library/core/src/primitive_docs.rs
Co-authored-by: Jubilee <46493976+workingjubilee@users.noreply.github.com>
Update library/core/src/primitive_docs.rs
Rewrite f16 and f128 hw support comments to match PR feedback
I wrote RISC-V allcaps in all cases, and wrote amd64 lowercase in all
cases, im not sure if either is the more correct way for either
platform, thats just how I normally write them, if theres a precedent
elsewhere it should probably be changed to match though.
Update library/core/src/primitive_docs.rs
Co-authored-by: Jubilee <46493976+workingjubilee@users.noreply.github.com>
Update library/core/src/primitive_docs.rs
Co-authored-by: Jubilee <46493976+workingjubilee@users.noreply.github.com>
Update library/core/src/primitive_docs.rs
Use `unchecked_sub` in `split_at`
LLVM currently isn't figuring it out on its own, even in the checked version where it hypothetically could.
Before: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/PEY38YrKs>
```llvm
bb1: ; preds = %start
%4 = getelementptr inbounds float, ptr %x.0, i64 %n
%5 = sub i64 %x.1, %n
```
After:
```llvm
bb1: ; preds = %start
%4 = getelementptr inbounds float, ptr %x.0, i64 %n
%5 = sub nuw i64 %x.1, %n
```
This is not using the wrapper because there's already a ubcheck covering it, so I don't want this to get a second one once #121571 lands.
---
This is basically the same as #108763, since `split_at` is essentially doing two `get_unchecked`s.
Docs: suggest `uN::checked_sub` instead of check-then-unchecked
As of #124114 it's exactly the same in codegen, so might as well not use `unsafe`.
Note that this is only for *unsigned*, since the overflow conditions for `iN::checked_sub` are more complicated.
Remove an unnecessary cast
Very minor thing, obviously, but I randomly saw this unnecessary cast showing up in the UbChecks, so might as well get rid of it.
As of 124114 it's exactly the same in codegen, so might as well not use `unsafe`.
Note that this is only for *unsigned*, since the overflow conditions for `iN::checked_sub` are more complicated.
Stabilize `split_at_checked`
Closes#119128
For the const version of `slice::split_at_mut_checked`, I'm reusing the `const_slice_split_at_mut` feature flag (#101804). I don't if it okay to reuse tracking issues or if it preferred to create new ones...
