8866: Update salsa r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
This updates salsa to include https://github.com/salsa-rs/salsa/pull/265, and removes all cancellation-related code from rust-analyzer
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
The idea here is to eventually get rid of `dyn Diagnostic` and
`DiagnosticSink` infrastructure altogether, and just have a `enum
hir::Diagnostic` instead.
The problem with `dyn Diagnostic` is that it is defined in the lowest
level of the stack (hir_expand), but is used by the highest level (ide).
As a first step, we free hir_expand and hir_def from `dyn Diagnostic`
and kick the can up to `hir_ty`, as an intermediate state. The plan is
then to move DiagnosticSink similarly to the hir crate, and, as final
third step, remove its usage from the ide.
One currently unsolved problem is testing. You can notice that the test
which checks precise diagnostic ranges, unresolved_import_in_use_tree,
was moved to the ide layer. Logically, only IDE should have the infra to
render a specific range.
At the same time, the range is determined with the data produced in
hir_def and hir crates, so this layering is rather unfortunate. Working
on hir_def shouldn't require compiling `ide` for testing.
8885: internal: greatly simplify eager macro representation r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
- Share structures with lazy macros, make both use `MacroCallLoc`.
- Remove `intern_eager_expansion`, `EagerCallLoc`, `EagerMacroId`, and *many* matches on `MacroCallId`.
- Make a lot of FIXMEs obsolete since the code no longer distinguishes between eager and lazy macros.
- Add `EagerCallInfo`, which is `Some` for calls to eager macros and holds the argument or expansion result and the included file.
8887: fix: fix derive collection after unresolved attribute fallback r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/8882#issuecomment-844379170
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
8882: internal: resolve attributes in name resolution (minimal version) r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/7049
This should not have any observable effect, since we don't attempt to expand attribute macros yet, and I have implemented a fallback that treats items with unresolved attributes as if the attribute wasn't there.
Derive helpers are not yet resolved. `#![register_{attr,tool}]` are not yet supported.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
8813: Get some more array lengths! r=lf- a=lf-
This is built on #8799 and thus contains its changes. I'll rebase it onto master when that one gets merged. It adds support for r-a understanding the length of:
* `let a: [u8; 2] = ...`
* `let a = b"aaa"`
* `let a = [0u8; 4]`
I have added support for getting the values of byte strings, which was not previously there. I am least confident in the correctness of this part and it probably needs some more tests, as we currently have only one test that exercised that part (!).
Fixes#2922.
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
Fix#2922: add unknown length as a condition for a type having unknown.
Incorporate reviews:
* Extract some of the const evaluation workings into functions
* Add fixmes on the hacks
* Add tests for impls on specific array lengths (these work!!! 😁)
* Add tests for const generics (indeed we don't support it yet)
8432: decl_check: consider outer scopes' allows r=jonas-schievink a=lf-
Fix#8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
I would like help filing the remaining bug, as it does actually affect
users, but I don't know how to describe the behaviour (or even if it
is unintended).
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
8443: Rewrite `#[derive]` removal code to be based on AST r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
We now remove any `#[derive]` before and including the one we want to expand, in the `macro_arg` query.
The same infra will be needed by attribute macros (except we only remove the attribute we're expanding, not any preceding ones).
Part of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8434 (doesn't implement the cfg-expansion yet, because that's more difficult)
8446: Undo path resolution hack for extern prelude r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Reverts the change made in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/7959
We don't populate the extern prelude for block DefMaps anymore,
so this is unnecessary
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
Fix#8417. Also makes it less noisy about no_mangle annotated stuff the
user can do nothing about.
Note: this still is broken with bitfield! macros. A repro in an ignore
test is included here. I believe this bug is elsewhere, and I don't
think I can work around it here.
Rationale: only a minority of variants used almost half the size.
By keeping large members (especially in Option) behind a box
the memory cost is only payed when the large variants are needed.
This reduces the size Vec<Expr> needs to allocate.
8352: Remove dead legacy macro expansion code r=lnicola a=brandondong
I was investigating some unrelated macro issue when I noticed this dead code. This legacy macro expansion logic was changed in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/8128.
Co-authored-by: Brandon <brandondong604@hotmail.com>
8245: Properly resolve intra doc links in hover and goto_definition r=matklad a=Veykril
Unfortunately involves a bit of weird workarounds due to pulldown_cmark's incorrect lifetimes on `BrokenLinkCallback`... I should probably open an issue there asking for the fixes to be pushed to a release since they already exist in the repo for quite some time it seems.
Fixes#8258, Fixes#8238
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
Bitflags is generally a good dependency -- it's lightweight, well
maintained and embraced by the ecosystem.
I wonder, however, do we really need it? Doesn't feel like it adds much
to be honest.
8322: Access a body's block def maps via a method r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
Only one upgradeable read lock can be handed out at the same time, and
we never acquire a non-upgradeable read lock, so this has no benefit
over just using a write lock in the first place.
