manual_let_else: support struct patterns
This adds upon the improvements of #10797 and:
* Only prints `()` around `Or` patterns at the top level (fixing a regression of #10797)
* Supports multi-binding patterns: `let (u, v) = if let (Some(u_i), Ok(v_i)) = ex { (u_i, v_i) } else ...`
* Traverses through tuple patterns: `let v = if let (Some(v), None) = ex { v } else ...`
* Supports struct patterns: `let v = if let S { v, w, } = ex { (v, w) } else ...`
```
changelog: [`manual_let_else`]: improve pattern printing to support struct patterns
```
fixes#10708fixes#10424
[`ptr_cast_constness`]: Only lint on casts which don't change type
fixes#10874
changelog: [`ptr_cast_constness`]: Only lint on casts which don't change type
Emit `unnecessary_cast` on raw pointers as well
Supersedes(?) #10782, since this and #10567 will cover the original issue.
Does not lint on type aliases or inferred types.
changelog: [`unnecessary_cast`]: Also emit on casts between raw pointers with the same type and constness
Clippy Book Chapter Updates Reborn: Refresh Lint Configuration's looks
This PR modernizes and clears up some confusion with the "Lint Configuration Options" chapter from the book.
### Changes
- **Remove 'Option - Default Value" table**
- Why was it even there?
- It shouldn't be the first thing an user sees when they enter the chapter. It's clunky, ugly and not useful. The default values for configs are stated in a per-config basis if needed.
- **Add a simple description of what the chapter contains, and the scheme of each configuration option**
- **Minor formatting, mainly adding code fragments to code text**
- It seemed weird and jarring not having back-ticks on text like "arithmetic_side_effects".
- Improves readability and separation between configs.
- **Separate a little bit the Affected Lints list + "Affected lists" message**
- Not having something indicating that the list is about the lints that use the configuration option is confusing.
- It isn't as important as the description and example. Therefore should be separated a little bit imo
---
This is an independent effort from #10597, but as it's still a Book Chapter Update, I thought it would be cool to include it here. I'm going to keep the reviewing process for this PR to rustbot's desires.
[Rendered](https://github.com/blyxyas/rust-clippy/blob/book-lint_config/book/src/lint_configuration.md)
[Current](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/master/book/src/lint_configuration.md)
changelog: Refresh styling from the "Lint Configuration Options" book chapter.
Update *Current stable* text in `CHANGELOG.md`
Roses are red,
violets are blue,
the new version was released,
and our changelog too
---
changelog: none
add checking for cfg(features = ...)
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: [`maybe_misused_cfg`]: check if `#[cfg(feature = "...")]` misused as `#[cfg(features = "...")]`
I've found that there is no indication when `#[cfg(features = "...")]` is used incorrectly, which can easily make mistakes hard to spot. When I searched for this code on github, I also found many misuse cases([link](https://github.com/search?q=%23%5Bcfg%28features+language%3ARust&type=code)).
PS: This clippy name is just a temporary name, it can be replaced with a better name.
Add spans to `clippy.toml` error messages
Adds spans to errors and warnings encountered when parsing `clippy.toml`.
changelog: Errors and warnings generated when parsing `clippy.toml` now point to the location in the TOML file the error/warning occurred.
Explain which paths clippy searches for configuration in docs
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9921.
Adds information on where to place the configuration files, it may be a bit verbose. Also added a comment to the section of the code where the search happens, to hopefully prevent changing that without updating the docs.
changelog: Make documentation about where to place configuration files clearer.
new lint: `missing_fields_in_debug`
Fixes#10429
This PR adds a new lint that looks for manual `Debug` implementations that do not "use" all of the fields.
This often happens when adding a new field to a struct.
It also acts as a style lint in case leaving out a field was intentional. In that case, it's preferred to use [`DebugStruct::finish_non_exhaustive`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/fmt/struct.DebugStruct.html#method.finish_non_exhaustive), which indicates that there are more fields that were explicitly not shown.
```
changelog: [`missing_fields_in_debug`]: missing fields in manual `Debug` implementation
```
move some strings into consts, more tests
s/missing_field_in_debug/missing_fields_in_debug
dont trigger in macro expansions
make dogfood tests happy
minor cleanups
replace HashSet with FxHashSet
replace match_def_path with match_type
if_chain -> let chains, fix markdown, allow newtype pattern
fmt
consider string literal in `.field()` calls as used
don't intern defined symbol, remove mentions of 'debug_tuple'
special-case PD, account for field access through `Deref`
Remove lint name and category fields from the new lint issue form
changelog: none
Picking a name/category is something the implementers/reviewers tend to cover anyway, I think asking people to come up with it at the time of their suggestion is more of a barrier than it's worth
Inspired by the mention in #10849
[`wildcard_imports`] Modules that contain `prelude` are also allowed
This commit fixes#10846 by checking if the path segment contains the word "prelude", allowing us
`use module_prelude::*`.
changelog: [`wildcard_imports`]: Modules that contain `prelude` are also allowed
`EarlyBinder::new` -> `EarlyBinder::bind`
for consistency with `Binder::bind`. it may make sense to also add `EarlyBinder::dummy` in places where we know that no parameters exist, but I left that out of this PR.
r? `@jackh726` `@kylematsuda`
Uplift `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint into two lints.
## `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked`
(deny-by-default)
The `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.
### Example
```rust
unsafe {
std::str::from_utf8_unchecked(b"cl\x82ippy");
}
```
### Explanation
Creating such a `str` would result in undefined behavior as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut`.
## `invalid_from_utf8`
(warn-by-default)
The `invalid_from_utf8` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.
### Example
```rust
std::str::from_utf8(b"ru\x82st");
```
### Explanation
Trying to create such a `str` would always return an error as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut`.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
````@rustbot```` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
-----
For Clippy:
changelog: Moves: Uplifted `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` into rustc
deps: drop serde feature from url, drop rustc-workspace-hack
Cargo now have it's own workspace and rustc dropped [`rustc-workspace-hack`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/109133), so no need to unify features here; drop rustc-workspace-hack.
changelog: none
Changelog for Rust 1.70 🔨
Roses are red,
violets are blue,
damn I have an exam to cram,
and this rhyme is a scam
---
This poem is... certainly something... Anyways, hope whoever is reading this, has a lovely day full of sunshine without the need to study :D
---
changelog: none
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most
compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl
From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that
require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly
what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This
will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have
any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to
preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the
compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites
(mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem
worthwhile.
Fixing `invalid_regex` with invalid UTF8. Also, adding more test cases
Fixing false positive and false negative when dealing with regex that could match invalid UTF8.
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/10825
changelog: [`invalid_regex`]: Fixing false positive and false negative when dealing with regex that could match invalid UTF8
