This fixes a couple of bugs visible on https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/marker/trait.Sync.html . For example:
* `impl<T> Sync for *const T` should read `impl<T> !Sync for *const T`
* `impl<T> !Sync for Weak<T>` should read `impl<T> !Sync for Weak<T> where T: ?Sized`
This does change a struct in librustdoc and it seems that almost everything there is marked public, so if librustdoc has stability guarantees that could be a problem. If it is, I'll find a way to rework the change to avoid modifying public structures.
I'm being constantly bitten by the lack of this implementation.
I'm unsure if there's a reason to avoid these implementations though.
Since we have a "lossy" implementation for both Mutex and RWLock (RWLock {{ locked }}) I don't think there's a big reason for not having a Debug implementation for the atomic types, even if the user can't specify the ordering.
Fixes#23812 by stripping the decoration when desugaring macro doc comments into #[doc] attributes, and detects whether the attribute should be inner or outer style and outputs the appropriate token tree.
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1174][rfc] which adds three new traits
to the standard library:
* `IntoRawFd` - implemented on Unix for all I/O types (files, sockets, etc)
* `IntoRawHandle` - implemented on Windows for files, processes, etc
* `IntoRawSocket` - implemented on Windows for networking types
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1174-into-raw-fd-socket-handle-traits.mdCloses#27062
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1174][rfc] which adds three new traits
to the standard library:
* `IntoRawFd` - implemented on Unix for all I/O types (files, sockets, etc)
* `IntoRawHandle` - implemented on Windows for files, processes, etc
* `IntoRawSocket` - implemented on Windows for networking types
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1174-into-raw-fd-socket-handle-traits.mdCloses#27062
And some other outdated language. @echochamber came asking about these docs
on IRC today, and they're a bit weird. I've updated them to be less ambiguous
and use contemporary terminology.
Per the title. I've linked to the reference at http://doc.rust-lang.org/reference.html#type-parameters-1, but I'm not sure that's such a good link - but there doesn't seem to be a great deal of explanation elsewhere in the reference either...
