Be stricter about rejecting LLVM reserved registers in asm!
LLVM will silently produce incorrect code if these registers are used as operands.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-inline-asm`
We had already reverted the change on stable back in PR #83412.
Since then, we've had some movement on issue #83139, but not a 100% fix.
But also since then, we had bug reported, issue #84667, that looks like outright
codegen breakage, rather than problems confined to debuginfo issues.
So we are reverting PR #77885 on stable and beta. We'll reland PR #77885 (or some
variant) switching back to an LLVM-dependent selection of out-of-line call vs
inline-asm, after these other issues have been resolved.
further split up const_fn feature flag
This continues the work on splitting up `const_fn` into separate feature flags:
* `const_fn_trait_bound` for `const fn` with trait bounds
* `const_fn_unsize` for unsizing coercions in `const fn` (looks like only `dyn` unsizing is still guarded here)
I don't know if there are even any things left that `const_fn` guards... at least libcore and liballoc do not need it any more.
`@oli-obk` are you currently able to do reviews?
This enables us to set more generic labels shared between targets. For
example `target_family="wasm"` across all targets that are conceptually
"wasm".
See https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1006
This commit implements the idea of a new ABI for the WebAssembly target,
one called `"wasm"`. This ABI is entirely of my own invention
and has no current precedent, but I think that the addition of this ABI
might help solve a number of issues with the WebAssembly targets.
When `wasm32-unknown-unknown` was first added to Rust I naively
"implemented an abi" for the target. I then went to write `wasm-bindgen`
which accidentally relied on details of this ABI. Turns out the ABI
definition didn't match C, which is causing issues for C/Rust interop.
Currently the compiler has a "wasm32 bindgen compat" ABI which is the
original implementation I added, and it's purely there for, well,
`wasm-bindgen`.
Another issue with the WebAssembly target is that it's not clear to me
when and if the default C ABI will change to account for WebAssembly's
multi-value feature (a feature that allows functions to return multiple
values). Even if this does happen, though, it seems like the C ABI will
be guided based on the performance of WebAssembly code and will likely
not match even what the current wasm-bindgen-compat ABI is today. This
leaves a hole in Rust's expressivity in binding WebAssembly where given
a particular import type, Rust may not be able to import that signature
with an updated C ABI for multi-value.
To fix these issues I had the idea of a new ABI for WebAssembly, one
called `wasm`. The definition of this ABI is "what you write
maps straight to wasm". The goal here is that whatever you write down in
the parameter list or in the return values goes straight into the
function's signature in the WebAssembly file. This special ABI is for
intentionally matching the ABI of an imported function from the
environment or exporting a function with the right signature.
With the addition of a new ABI, this enables rustc to:
* Eventually remove the "wasm-bindgen compat hack". Once this
ABI is stable wasm-bindgen can switch to using it everywhere.
Afterwards the wasm32-unknown-unknown target can have its default ABI
updated to match C.
* Expose the ability to precisely match an ABI signature for a
WebAssembly function, regardless of what the C ABI that clang chooses
turns out to be.
* Continue to evolve the definition of the default C ABI to match what
clang does on all targets, since the purpose of that ABI will be
explicitly matching C rather than generating particular function
imports/exports.
Naturally this is implemented as an unstable feature initially, but it
would be nice for this to get stabilized (if it works) in the near-ish
future to remove the wasm32-unknown-unknown incompatibility with the C
ABI. Doing this, however, requires the feature to be on stable because
wasm-bindgen works with stable Rust.
This commit adds an additional target property – `supported_sanitizers`,
and replaces the hardcoded allowlists in argument parsing to use this
new property.
Fixes#81802
rustc_target: Avoid unwraps when adding linker flags
These `unwrap`s assume that some linker flags were already added by `*_base::opts()` methods, but that's doesn't necessarily remain the case when we are reducing the number of flags hardcoded in targets, as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83587 shows.
r? `@nagisa`
The frontend shouldn't be deciding whether or not to use mutable
noalias attributes, as this is a pure LLVM concern. Only provide
the necessary information and do the actual decision in
codegen_llvm.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #81309 (always eagerly eval consts in Relate)
- #82217 (Edition-specific preludes)
- #82807 (rustdoc: Remove redundant enableSearchInput function)
- #82924 (WASI: Switch to crt1-command.o to enable support for new-style commands)
- #82949 (Do not attempt to unlock envlock in child process after a fork.)
- #82955 (fix: wrong word)
- #82962 (Treat header as first paragraph for shortened markdown descriptions)
- #82976 (fix error message for copy(_nonoverlapping) overflow)
- #82977 (Rename `Option::get_or_default` to `get_or_insert_default`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
WASI: Switch to crt1-command.o to enable support for new-style commands
This switches Rust's WASI target to use crt1-command.o instead of
crt1.o, which enables support for new-style commands. By default,
new-style commands work the same way as old-style commands, so nothing
immediately changes here, but this will be needed by later changes to
enable support for typed arguments.
See here for more information on new-style commands:
- https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc/pull/203
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D81689
r? ```@alexcrichton```
Implement RFC 2945: "C-unwind" ABI
## Implement RFC 2945: "C-unwind" ABI
This branch implements [RFC 2945]. The tracking issue for this RFC is #74990.
The feature gate for the issue is `#![feature(c_unwind)]`.
This RFC was created as part of the ffi-unwind project group tracked at rust-lang/lang-team#19.
### Changes
Further details will be provided in commit messages, but a high-level overview
of the changes follows:
* A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`,
and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI boundaries is
acceptable. The cases where each of these variants' `unwind` member is true
correspond with the `C-unwind`, `system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and
`thiscall-unwind` ABI strings introduced in RFC 2945 [3].
* This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings.
Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`, which
ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the new ABIs.
A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well.
* We adjust the `rustc_middle::ty::layout::fn_can_unwind` function,
used to compute whether or not a `FnAbi` object represents a function that
should be able to unwind when `panic=unwind` is in use.
* Changes are also made to
`rustc_mir_build::build::should_abort_on_panic` so that the function ABI is
used to determind whether it should abort, assuming that the `panic=unwind`
strategy is being used, and no explicit unwind attribute was provided.
[RFC 2945]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md
### Add debug assertion to check `AbiDatas` ordering
This makes a small alteration to `Abi::index`, so that we include a
debug assertion to check that the index we are returning corresponds
with the same abi in our data array.
This will help prevent ordering bugs in the future, which can
manifest in rather strange errors.
### Using exhaustive ABI matches
This slightly modifies the changes from our previous commits,
favoring exhaustive matches in place of `_ => ...` fall-through
arms.
This should help with maintenance in the future, when additional
ABI's are added, or when existing ABI's are modified.
### List all `-unwind` ABI's in unstable book
This updates the `c-unwind` page in the unstable book to list _all_
of the other ABI strings that are introduced by this feature gate.
Now, all of the ABI's specified by RFC 2945 are shown.
Co-authored-by: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Niko Matsakis <niko@alum.mit.edu>
### Overview
This commit begins the implementation work for RFC 2945. For more
information, see the rendered RFC [1] and tracking issue [2].
A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`,
and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI
boundaries is acceptable. The cases where each of these variants'
`unwind` member is true correspond with the `C-unwind`,
`system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind` ABI strings
introduced in RFC 2945 [3].
### Feature Gate and Unstable Book
This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings.
Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`,
which ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the
new ABIs.
A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well.
### Further Work To Be Done
This commit does not proceed to implement the new unwinding ABIs,
and is intentionally scoped specifically to *defining* the ABIs and
their feature flag.
### One Note on Test Churn
This will lead to some test churn, in re-blessing hash tests, as the
deleted comment in `src/librustc_target/spec/abi.rs` mentioned,
because we can no longer guarantee the ordering of the `Abi`
variants.
While this is a downside, this decision was made bearing in mind
that RFC 2945 states the following, in the "Other `unwind` Strings"
section [3]:
> More unwind variants of existing ABI strings may be introduced,
> with the same semantics, without an additional RFC.
Adding a new variant for each of these cases, rather than specifying
a payload for a given ABI, would quickly become untenable, and make
working with the `Abi` enum prone to mistakes.
This approach encodes the unwinding information *into* a given ABI,
to account for the future possibility of other `-unwind` ABI
strings.
### Ignore Directives
`ignore-*` directives are used in two of our `*-unwind` ABI test
cases.
Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases
ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and
`thiscall`, respectively.
These directives are cribbed from
`src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and
`src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`.
This would otherwise fail on some targets, see:
fcf697f902
### Footnotes
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md
[2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990
[3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md#other-unwind-abi-strings
This switches Rust's WASI target to use crt1-command.o instead of
crt1.o, which enables support for new-style commands. By default,
new-style commands work the same way as old-style commands, so nothing
immediately changes here, but this will be needed by later changes to
enable support for typed arguments.
See here for more information on new-style commands:
- https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc/pull/203
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D81689
Change built-in kernel targets to be os = none throughout
Whether for Rust's own `target_os`, LLVM's triples, or GNU config's, the
OS-related have fields have been for code running *on* that OS, not code
hat is *part* of the OS.
The difference is huge, as syscall interfaces are nothing like
freestanding interfaces. Kernels are (hypervisors and other more exotic
situations aside) freestanding programs that use the interfaces provided
by the hardware. It's *those* interfaces, the ones external to the
program being built and its software dependencies, that are the content
of the target.
For the Linux Kernel in particular, `target_env: "gnu"` is removed for
the same reason: that `-gnu` refers to glibc or GNU/linux, neither of
which applies to the kernel itself.
Relates to #74247
Upgrade to LLVM 12
This implements the necessary adjustments to make rustc work with LLVM 12. I didn't encounter any major issues so far.
r? `@cuviper`
Whether for Rust's own `target_os`, LLVM's triples, or GNU config's, the
OS-related have fields have been for code running *on* that OS, not code
that is *part* of the OS.
The difference is huge, as syscall interfaces are nothing like
freestanding interfaces. Kernels are (hypervisors and other more exotic
situations aside) freestanding programs that use the interfaces provided
by the hardware. It's *those* interfaces, the ones external to the
program being built and its software dependencies, that are the content
of the target.
For the Linux Kernel in particular, `target_env: "gnu"` is removed for
the same reason: that `-gnu` refers to glibc or GNU/linux, neither of
which applies to the kernel itself.
Relates to #74247
Thanks @ojeda for catching some things.
Fixed support for macOS Catalyst on ARM64
When I initially added Arm64 Catalyst support in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77484 I had access to a DTK. However, while waiting to merge the PR some other changes were merged which caused conflicts in the branch. When fixing those conflicts I had no access to the DTK anymore and didn't try out if the resulting binaries did indeed work on Apple Silicon. I finally have a M1 and I realized that some small changes were necessary to support Apple Silicon. This PR adds the required changes. I've been running binaries generated with this branch for some time now and they work without issues.
The first argument to an x86-interrupt ABI function was implicitly
treated as byval prior to LLVM 12. Since LLVM 12, it has to be
marked as such explicitly: 2e0e03c6a0
Remove the x86_64-rumprun-netbsd target
Herein we remove the target from the compiler and the code from libstd intended to support the now-defunct rumprun project.
Closes#81514
