Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #50531 (Cleanup uses of TypeIdHasher and replace them with StableHasher)
- #50819 (Fix potential divide by zero)
- #50827 (Update LLVM to 56c931901cfb85cd6f7ed44c7d7520a8de1edf97)
- #50829 (CheckLoopVisitor: also visit break expressions)
- #50854 (in which the unused shorthand field pattern debacle/saga continues)
- #50858 (Reorder description for snippets in rustdoc documentation)
- #50883 (Fix warning when building stage0 libcore)
- #50889 (Update clippy)
Failed merges:
Fix potential divide by zero
This should fix#50761
I had trouble reproducing with the provided code, but looking at the stack trace would indicate that this code is the likely cause. I made a number of assumptions here, because I don't have enough context on how the register size is set:
1. I assumed `rest.unit.size.bytes()` can be 0, and it's ok if it's set to 0 before this function is called
2. I assumed that if `rest.unit.size.bytes()` is 0, that we want `rest_count` to also be 0.
Fix warning when building stage0 libcore
When building stage0 a warning will be triggered when compiling libcore
due to `align_to_offsets` not being used.
Reorder description for snippets in rustdoc documentation
The example code snippets for the `no_run` and `compile_fail` attributes in the rustdoc documentation were followed by the description for the wrong attribute. This patch reorders the descriptions to match the code snippets.
in which the unused shorthand field pattern debacle/saga continues
In e4b1a79 (#47922), we corrected erroneous suggestions for unused
shorthand field pattern bindings, suggesting `field: _` where the
previous suggestion of `_field` wouldn't even have compiled
(#47390). Soon, it was revealed that this was insufficient (#50303), and
the fix was extended to references, slices, &c. (#50327) But even this
proved inadequate, as the erroneous suggestions were still being issued
for patterns in local (`let`) bindings (#50804). Here, we yank the
shorthand-detection and variable/node registration code into a new
common function that can be called while visiting both match arms and
`let` bindings.
Resolves#50804.
r? @estebank
remove semicolon -_-
Add rem_bytes to conditional to avoid error when performing mod by 0
Add test file to confirm compilation passes.
Ensure we don't divide or mod by zero in llvm_type. Include test file from issue.
Add lint checks for unused loop labels
Previously no warning was generated when a loop label was written out but never used (i.e. in a `break` or `continue` statement):
```rust
fn main() {
'unused_label: loop {}
}
```
would compile without complaint.
This fix introduces `-W unused_loop_label`, which generates the following warning message for the above snippet:
```
warning: unused loop label
--> main.rs:2:5
|
2 | 'unused_label: loop {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: #[warn(unused_loop_label)] on by default
```
Fixes: #50751.
Turn deprecation lint `legacy_imports` into a hard error
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/38260
The lint was introduced in Dec 2016, then made deny-by-default in Jun 2017 when crater run found 0 regressions caused by it.
This lint requires some not entirely trivial amount of import resolution logic that (surprisingly or not) interacts with `feature(use_extern_macros)` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35896), so it would be desirable to remove it before stabilizing `use_extern_macros`.
In particular, this PR fixes the failing example in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50725 (but not the whole issue, `use std::panic::{self}` still can cause other undesirable errors when `use_extern_macros` is enabled).
Emit noalias on &mut parameters by default
This used to be disabled due to LLVM bugs in the handling of
noalias information in conjunction with unwinding. However,
according to #31681 all known LLVM bugs have been fixed by
LLVM 6.0, so it's probably time to reenable this optimization.
-Z no-mutable-noalias is left as an escape-hatch to debug problems
suspected to stem from this change.
Implement [T]::align_to
Note that this PR deviates from what is accepted by RFC slightly by making `align_offset` to return an offset in elements, rather than bytes. This is necessary to sanely support `[T]::align_to` and also simply makes more sense™. The caveat is that trying to align a pointer of ZST is now an equivalent to `is_aligned` check, rather than anything else (as no number of ZST elements will align a misaligned ZST pointer).
It also implements the `align_to` slightly differently than proposed in the RFC to properly handle cases where size of T and U aren’t co-prime.
Furthermore, a promise is made that the slice containing `U`s will be as large as possible (contrary to the RFC) – otherwise the function is quite useless.
The implementation uses quite a few underhanded tricks and takes advantage of the fact that alignment is a power-of-two quite heavily to optimise the machine code down to something that results in as few known-expensive instructions as possible. Currently calling `ptr.align_offset` with an unknown-at-compile-time `align` results in code that has just a single "expensive" modulo operation; the rest is "cheap" arithmetic and bitwise ops.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44488 @oli-obk
As mentioned in the commit message for align_offset, many thanks go to Chris McDonald.
Make the `const_err` lint `deny`-by-default
At best these things are runtime panics (debug mode) or overflows (release mode). More likely they are public constants that are unused in the crate declaring them.
This is not a breaking change, as dependencies won't break and root crates can `#![warn(const_err)]`, though I don't know why anyone would do that.
The example code snippets for the `no_run` and `compile_fail` attributes
in the rustdoc documentation were followed by the description for the
wrong attribute. This patch reorders the descriptions to match the code
snippets.
Implement edition hygiene for keywords
Determine "keywordness" of an identifier in its hygienic context.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/49611
I've resurrected `proc` as an Edition-2015-only keyword for testing purposes, but it should probably be buried again. EDIT: `proc` is removed again.
