Implement str to [u8] conversion for refcounted containers
This seems motivated to complete the APIs for shared containers since we already have similar allocation-free conversions for strings like `From<Box<[u8]>> for Box<str>`.
Insta-stable since it's a new trait impl?
Make [e]println macros eagerly drop temporaries (for backport)
This PR extracts the subset of #96455 which is only the parts necessary for fixing the 1.61-beta regressions in #96434.
My larger PR #96455 contains a few other changes relative to the pre-#94868 behavior; those are not necessary to backport into 1.61.
argument position | before #94868 | after #94868 | after this PR
--- |:---:|:---:|:---:
`write!($tmp, "…", …)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`write!(…, "…", $tmp)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`writeln!($tmp, "…", …)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`writeln!(…, "…", $tmp)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`print!("…", $tmp)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`println!("…", $tmp)` | 😺 | 😡 | 😺
`eprint!("…", $tmp)` | 😡 | 😡 | 😡
`eprintln!("…", $tmp)` | 😺 | 😡 | 😺
`panic!("…", $tmp)` | 😺 | 😺 | 😺
Using an obviously-placeholder syntax. An RFC would still be needed before this could have any chance at stabilization, and it might be removed at any point.
But I'd really like to have it in nightly at least to ensure it works well with try_trait_v2, especially as we refactor the traits.
Revert "Re-export core::ffi types from std::ffi"
This reverts commit 9aed829fe6cdf5eaf278c6c3972f7acd0830887d.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96435 , a regression
in crates doing `use std::ffi::*;` and `use std::os::raw::*;`.
We can re-add this re-export once the `core::ffi` types
are stable, and thus the `std::os::raw` types can become re-exports as
well, which will avoid the conflict. (Type aliases to the same type
still conflict, but re-exports of the same type don't.)
Windows: Make stdin pipes synchronous
Stdin pipes do not need to be used asynchronously within the standard library. This is a first step in making pipes mostly synchronous.
r? `@m-ou-se`
std: directly use pthread in UNIX parker implementation
`Mutex` and `Condvar` are being replaced by more efficient implementations, which need thread parking themselves (see #93740). Therefore we should use the `pthread` synchronization primitives directly. Also, we can avoid allocating the mutex and condition variable because the `Parker` struct is being placed in an `Arc` anyways.
This basically is just a copy of the current `Mutex` and `Condvar` code, which will however be removed (again, see #93740). An alternative implementation could be to use dedicated private `OsMutex` and `OsCondvar` types, but all the other platforms supported by std actually have their own thread parking primitives.
I used `Pin` to guarantee a stable address for the `Parker` struct, while the current implementation does not, rather using extra unsafe declaration. Since the thread struct is shared anyways, I assumed this would not add too much clutter while being clearer.
rustc_ast: Harmonize delimiter naming with `proc_macro::Delimiter`
Compiler cannot reuse `proc_macro::Delimiter` directly due to extra impls, but can at least use the same naming.
After this PR the only difference between these two enums is that `proc_macro::Delimiter::None` is turned into `token::Delimiter::Invisible`.
It's my mistake that the invisible delimiter is called `None` on stable, during the stabilization I audited the naming and wrote the docs, but missed the fact that the `None` naming gives a wrong and confusing impression about what this thing is.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96421
r? ``@nnethercote``
Add VecDeque::extend from vec::IntoIter and slice::Iter specializations
Inspired from the [`Vec` `SpecExtend` implementation](027a232755/library/alloc/src/vec/spec_extend.rs), but without the specialization for `TrustedLen` which I'll look into in the future.
Should help #95632 and https://github.com/KillingSpark/zstd-rs/pull/17
## Benchmarks
Before
```
test vec_deque::bench_extend_bytes ... bench: 862 ns/iter (+/- 10)
test vec_deque::bench_extend_vec ... bench: 883 ns/iter (+/- 19)
```
After
```
test vec_deque::bench_extend_bytes ... bench: 8 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test vec_deque::bench_extend_vec ... bench: 24 ns/iter (+/- 1)
```
Make EncodeWide implement FusedIterator
[`EncodeUtf16`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/str/struct.EncodeUtf16.html) and [`EncodeWide`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/os/windows/ffi/struct.EncodeWide.html) currently serve similar purposes: They convert from UTF-8 to UTF-16 and WTF-8 to WTF-16, respectively. `EncodeUtf16` wraps a &str, whereas `EncodeWide` wraps an &OsStr.
When Iteration has concluded, these iterators wrap an empty slice, which will forever yield `None` values. Hence, `EncodeUtf16` rightfully implements `FusedIterator`. However, `EncodeWide` in contrast does not, even though it serves an almost identical purpose.
This PR attempts to fix that issue. I consider this change minor and non-controversial, hence why I have not added a RFC/FCP. Please let me know if the stability attribute is wrong or contains a wrong version number. Thanks in advance.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96368
This reverts commit 9aed829fe6cdf5eaf278c6c3972f7acd0830887d.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96435 , a regression
in crates doing `use std::ffi::*;` and `use std::os::raw::*;`.
We can re-add this re-export once the `core::ffi` types
are stable, and thus the `std::os::raw` types can become re-exports as
well, which will avoid the conflict. (Type aliases to the same type
still conflict, but re-exports of the same type don't.)
Define a dedicated error type for `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid`.
Define `NullHandleError` and `InvalidHandleError` types, that implement std::error::Error, and use them as the error types in `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid`,
This addresses [this concern](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87074#issuecomment-1080031167).
This is the same as #95387.
r? `@joshtriplett`
Clarify that `Cow::into_owned` returns owned data
Two sections of the `Cow::into_owned` docs imply that `into_owned` returns a `Cow`. Clarify that it returns the underlying owned object, either cloned or extracted from the `Cow`.
Fix some confusing wording and improve slice-search-related docs
This adds more links between `contains` and `binary_search` because I do think they have some relevant connections. If your (big) slice happens to be sorted and you know it, surely you should be using `[3; 100].binary_search(&5).is_ok()` over `[3; 100].contains(&5)`?
This also fixes the confusing "searches this sorted X" wording which just sounds really weird because it doesn't know whether it's actually sorted. It should be but it may not be. The new wording should make it clearer that you will probably want to sort it and in the same sentence it also mentions the related function `contains`.
Similarly, this mentions `binary_search` on `contains`' docs.
This also fixes some other minor stuff and inconsistencies.
