Instead, wait until coercion time. This has some small effects on a few
tests (one less temporary, generally better errors when trying to call
methods or otherwise "force" the type).
`match { }` now (correctly?) indicates divergence, which results in more
unreachable warnings. We also avoid fallback to `!` if there is just one
arm (see new test: `match-unresolved-one-arm.rs`).
The new strategy is as follows. First, the `!` type is assigned
in two cases:
- a block with a diverging statement and no tail expression (e.g.,
`{return;}`);
- any expression with the type `!` is considered diverging.
Second, we track when we are in a diverging state, and we permit a value
of any type to be coerced **into** `!` if the expression that produced
it is diverging. This means that `fn foo() -> ! { panic!(); 22 }`
type-checks, even though the block has a type of `usize`.
Finally, coercions **from** the `!` type to any other are always
permitted.
Fixes#39808.
In master, this field was an arbitrary node-id (in fact, an id for
something that doesn't even exist in the HIR -- the `catch` node).
Breaks targeting this block used that id. In the newer system, this
field is a boolean, and any breaks targeted this block will use the
id of the block.
macros: improve `Span`'s expansion information
This PR improves `Span`'s expansion information. More specifically:
- It refactors AST node span construction to preserve expansion information.
- Today, we only use the underlying tokens' `BytePos`s, throwing away the `ExpnId`s.
- This improves the accuracy of AST nodes' expansion information, fixing #30506.
- It refactors `span.expn_id: ExpnId` to `span.ctxt: SyntaxContext` and removes `ExpnId`.
- This gives all tokens as much hygiene information as `Ident`s.
- This is groundwork for procedural macros 2.0 `TokenStream` API.
- This is also groundwork for declarative macros 2.0, which will need this hygiene information for some non-`Ident` tokens.
- It simplifies processing of spans' expansion information throughout the compiler.
- It fixes#40649.
- It fixes#39450 and fixes part of #23480.
r? @nrc
libcore: fix compilation on 16bit target (MSP430).
Since PR #40601 has been merged, libcore no longer compiles on MSP430.
The reason is this code in `break_patterns`:
```rust
let mut random = len;
random ^= random << 13;
random ^= random >> 17;
random ^= random << 5;
random &= modulus - 1;
```
It assumes that `len` is at least a 32 bit integer.
As a workaround replace `break_patterns` with an empty function for 16bit targets.
cc @stjepang
cc @alexcrichton
Clarify suggetion for field used as method
Instead of
```rust
error: no method named `src_addr` found for type `&wire::ipv4::Repr` in the current scope
--> src/wire/ipv4.rs:409:34
|
409 | packet.set_src_addr(self.src_addr());
| ^^^^^^^^
|
note: did you mean to write `self.src_addr`?
--> src/wire/ipv4.rs:409:34
|
409 | packet.set_src_addr(self.src_addr());
| ^^^^^^^^
```
present
```rust
error: no method named `src_addr` found for type `&wire::ipv4::Repr` in the current scope
--> src/wire/ipv4.rs:409:34
|
409 | packet.set_src_addr(self.src_addr());
| ^^^^^^^^ field, not a method
|
= help: did you mean to write `self.src_addr` instead of `self.src_addr(...)`?
```
Fix#38321.
Rustdoc: memoize `pub use`-reexported macros so they don't appear twice in docs
Closes#39436
Preserves existing behavior for `#[macro_reexport]`. `pub use`'d macros are shown as reexports unless inlined, and also correctly obey `#[doc(hidden)]`.
r? @jseyfried
cc @SergioBenitez
Attempt to cache git modules
Partial resolution of #40772, appveyor remains to be done once travis looks like it's working ok.
The approach in this PR is based on the `--reference` flag to `git-clone`/`git-submodule --update` and is a compromise based on the current limitations of the tools we're using.
The ideal would be:
1. have a cached pristine copy of rust-lang/rust master in `$HOME/rustsrc` with all submodules initialised
2. clone the PR branch with `git clone --recurse-submodules --reference $HOME/rustsrc git@github.com:rust-lang/rust.git`
This would (in the nonexistent ideal world) use the pristine copy as an object cache for the top level repo and all submodules, transferring over the network only the changes on the branch. Unfortunately, a) there is no way to manually control the initial clone with travis and b) even if there was, cloned submodules don't use the submodules of the reference as an object cache. So the steps we end up with are:
1. have a cached pristine copy of rust-lang/rust master in `$HOME/rustsrc` with all submodules initialised
2. have a cloned PR branch
3. extract the path of each submodule, and explicitly `git submodule update --init --reference $HOME/rustsrc/$module $module` (i.e. point directly to the location of the pristine submodule repo) for each one
I've also taken some care to make this forward compatible, both for adding and removing submodules.
r? @alexcrichton
borrowck: consolidate `mut` suggestions
This converts all of borrowck's `mut` suggestions to a new
`mc::ImmutabilityBlame` API instead of the current mix of various hacks.
Fixes#35937.
Fixes#40823.
Fixes#40859.
cc @estebank
r? @pnkfelix
Add all unstable features to Unstable Book.
Add all unstable features to the Unstable Book, also remove a few that
either no longer exist or were promoted to stable.
These changes were extracted out of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/40694
Added core::cmp::Reverse for sort_by_key reverse sorting
I'm not sure if this is the best way to go about proposing this feature but it's pretty useful. It allows you to use `sort_by_key` and return tuples where a single item is then reversed to how it normally sorts.
I quite miss something like this in Rust currently though I'm not sure if this is the best way to implement it.
Add all unstable features to the Unstable Book, also remove a few that
either no longer exist or were promoted to stable.
These changes were extracted out of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/40694
Update various book modules
This includes an important fix for rustc contributors in
https://github.com/rust-lang/book/pull/571
I'm going to update the other ones as well here while we're at it; no
need to spam PRs.
r? @nrc
Improve std::net docs
Fixes#29363
Summary:
* Added a _lot_ of missing links, both to other types/methods and to IETF RFCs, and changed occurences of just "RFC" to "IETF RFC"
* Expanded a bunch of top-level docs, specifically the module docs & the docs for `TcpListener`, `TcpStream`, `UdpSocket`, `IpAddr`, `Ipv4Addr`, `Ipv6Addr`, `SocketAddr`, `SocketAddrV4`, `SocketAddrV6`,
* Expanded method docs for `SocketAddrV6`, `AddrParseError`,
* Various edits for clarity, consistency, and accuracy
See the commit descriptions for more detail.
Things not done quite as laid out in the task list in #29363:
* `AddrParseError` still doesn't have examples, but I wasn't quite sure how to do them; other `FromStr` error types don't have any, either
* I didn't link to an IETF RFC in `IpAddr`, but in `Ipv4Addr` and `Ipv6Addr` and linked tho those from `IpAddr`; this seems more appropriate to me
* Similarly, I didn't really exand `SocketAddr`'s docs, but elaborated on `SocketAddrV4` and `SocketAddrV6`'s and linked to them from `SocketAddr`
Theres definitely still room for improvement, but this should be a good first effort 😄
Document Cursor::new position is 0
... even if contained `Vec` is not empty. E. g. for
```
let v = vec![10u8, 20];
let mut c = io::Cursor::new(v);
c.write_all(b"aaaa").unwrap();
println!("{:?}", c.into_inner());
```
result is
```
[97, 97, 97, 97]
```
and not
```
[10, 20, 97, 97, 97, 97]
```
Specialize Vec::from_iter for vec::IntoIter
It's fairly common to expose an API which takes an `IntoIterator` and
immediately collects that into a vector. It's also common to buffer
a bunch of items into a vector and then pass that into one of these
APIs. If the iterator hasn't been advanced, we can make this `from_iter`
simply reassemble the original `Vec` with no actual iteration or
reallocation.
r? @aturon
Update docs for std::str
fixes#29375
I noticed there are docs for the `str` primitive type, which contained extensive examples, so my additions give a more general explanation of `&str`. But please let me know if something can be explained more or changed.
r? @steveklabnik