8993: fix: don't show pd/ppd completions where it shouldn't be r=flodiebold a=eduardocanellas
Closes #8992
Co-authored-by: Eduardo Canellas <eduardocanellas98@gmail.com>
8994: Check for subdirs in vfs loader exclusions. r=matklad a=ammkrn
The current logic used to transfer global_excludes into vfs exclusions
only transfers global_excludes that are the parent of an item in
dirs.include.
This commit additionally adds an item from global_exclude to the vfs
exclusions if the global_exclude is a child of an included item.
Co-authored-by: ammkrn <ammkrn@tuta.io>
The current logic used to transfer global_excludes into vfs exclusions
only transfers global_excludes that are the parent of an item in
dirs.include.
This commit additionally adds an item from global_exclude to the vfs
exclusions if the global_exclude is a child of an included item.
The idea here is to eventually get rid of `dyn Diagnostic` and
`DiagnosticSink` infrastructure altogether, and just have a `enum
hir::Diagnostic` instead.
The problem with `dyn Diagnostic` is that it is defined in the lowest
level of the stack (hir_expand), but is used by the highest level (ide).
As a first step, we free hir_expand and hir_def from `dyn Diagnostic`
and kick the can up to `hir_ty`, as an intermediate state. The plan is
then to move DiagnosticSink similarly to the hir crate, and, as final
third step, remove its usage from the ide.
One currently unsolved problem is testing. You can notice that the test
which checks precise diagnostic ranges, unresolved_import_in_use_tree,
was moved to the ide layer. Logically, only IDE should have the infra to
render a specific range.
At the same time, the range is determined with the data produced in
hir_def and hir crates, so this layering is rather unfortunate. Working
on hir_def shouldn't require compiling `ide` for testing.
8990: feat: Also do goto implementation on assoc consts r=lnicola a=lf-
I forgot to put this into #8988, sorry.
Goto implementation on a const on the trait will go to the
implementations with their respective definitions of the const, if
present.
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
I forgot to put this into #8988, sorry.
Goto implementation on a const on the trait will go to the
implementations with their respective definitions of the const, if
present.
8987: Fix lowering of FnOnce() without return type r=flodiebold a=flodiebold
This should result in an implicit `-> ()`, not leaving out the binding.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
8767: implement range formatting r=matklad a=euclio
Fixes#7580.
This PR implements the `textDocument/rangeFormatting` request using `rustfmt`'s `--file-lines` option.
Still needs some tests. What I want to know is how I should handle the instability of the `--file-lines` option. It's still unstable in rustfmt, so it's only available on nightly, and needs a special flag to enable. Is there a way for `rust-analyzer` to detect if it's using nightly rustfmt, or for users to opt-in?
Co-authored-by: Andy Russell <arussell123@gmail.com>
8986: Add go to type definition for struct fields within struct r=matklad a=lf-
Example:
```rust
struct A;
struct B {
a/*<- cursor*/: A,
}
```
Go to type definition used to not work on this position. It now goes to
`A` as expected.
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
Example:
```rust
struct A;
struct B {
a/*<- cursor*/: A,
}
```
Go to type definition used to not work on this position. It now goes to
`A` as expected.
8942: Add `library` semantic token modifier to items from other crates r=arzg a=arzg
Closes#5772.
A lot of code here is pretty repetitive; please let me know if you have any ideas how to improve it, or whether it’s fine as-is.
Side-note: How can I add tests for this? I don’t see a way for the test Rust code in `test_highlighting` to reference other crates to observe the new behaviour.
Co-authored-by: Aramis Razzaghipour <aramisnoah@gmail.com>
8979: minor: update `CrateGraph` comment r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
`cfg` flags are now implemented, and crates *may* have names, it doesn't
doesn't matter for name resolution
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
8975: Use todo!() as placeholder body for generated match arms r=matklad a=jDomantas
`todo!()` seems to be a better fit for this than `{}`. Seeing that this assist predates stabilization of `todo` my guess is that simply no one bothered to change it yet.
Also fixed the issue where if the last arm was not block-like, rust-analyzer would not add a comma after it and would generate invalid code.
Co-authored-by: Domantas Jadenkus <djadenkus@gmail.com>
8970: fix: duplicate dependencies that have multiple DepKinds r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Cargo collapses identical dependencies that are listed under `[dependencies]` and `[build-dependencies]` into a single `NodeDep`. We have to undo that by duplicating the dependency for each of its listed `DepKind`s.
Not doing that would incorrectly treat a dependency as `DepKind::Normal`, even though it is *also* meant to be a `DepKind::Build`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/8812#issuecomment-847125395
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
8955: feature: Support standalone Rust files r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
![standalone](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2690773/119277037-0b579380-bc26-11eb-8d77-20d46ab4916a.gif)
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/6388
Caveats:
* I've decided to support multiple detached files in the code (anticipating the scratch files), but I found no way to open multiple files in VSCode at once: running `code *.rs` makes the plugin to register in the `vscode.workspace.textDocuments` only the first file, while code actually displays all files later.
Apparently what happens is the same as when you have VSCode open at some workplace already and then run `code some_other_file.rs`: it gets opened in the same workspace of the same VSCode with no server to support it.
If there's a way to override it, I'd appreciate the pointer.
* No way to toggle inlay hints, since the setting is updated for the workspace (which does not exist for a single file opened)
> [2021-05-24 00:22:49.100] [exthost] [error] Error: Unable to write to Workspace Settings because no workspace is opened. Please open a workspace first and try again.
* No runners/lens to run or check the code are implemented for this mode.
In theory, we can detect `rustc`, run it on a file and run the resulting binary, but not sure if worth doing it at this stage.
Otherwise imports, hints, completion and other features work.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>