4571: KISS SourceChange r=matklad a=matklad
The idea behind requiring the label is a noble one, but we are not
really using it consistently anyway, and it should be easy to retrofit
later, should we need it.
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
The idea behind requiring the label is a noble one, but we are not
really using it consistently anyway, and it should be easy to retrofit
later, should we need it.
4516: LSP: Two stage initialization r=kjeremy a=kjeremy
Fills in server information.
Derives CodeAction capabilities from the client. If code action literals
are unsupported we fall back to the "simple support" which just sends back
commands (this is already supported in our config). The difference being
that we did not adjust our server capabilities so that if the client was
checking for `CodeActionProvider: "true"` in the response that would have failed.
Part of #144Fixes#4130 (the specific case called out in that issue)
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
This also changes our handiling of snippet edits on the client side.
`editor.insertSnippet` unfortunately forces indentation, which we
really don't want to have to deal with. So, let's just implement our
manual hacky way of dealing with a simple subset of snippets we
actually use in rust-analyzer
Fills in server information.
Derives CodeAction capabilities from the client. If code action literals
are unsupported we fall back to the "simple support" which just sends back
commands (this is already supported in our config). The difference being
that we did not adjust our server capabilities so that if the client was
checking for `CodeActionProvider: "true"` in the response that would have failed.
4448: Generate configuration for launch.json r=vsrs a=vsrs
This PR adds two new commands: `"rust-analyzer.debug"` and `"rust-analyzer.newDebugConfig"`. The former is a supplement to the existing `"rust-analyzer.run"` command and works the same way: asks for a runnable and starts new debug session. The latter allows adding a new configuration to **launch.json** (or to update an existing one).
If the new option `"rust-analyzer.debug.useLaunchJson"` is set to true then `"rust-analyzer.debug"` and Debug Lens will first look for existing debug configuration in **launch.json**. That is, it has become possible to specify startup arguments, env variables, etc.
`"rust-analyzer.debug.useLaunchJson"` is false by default, but it might be worth making true the default value. Personally I prefer true, but I'm not sure if it is good for all value.
----
I think that this PR also solves https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3441.
Both methods to update launch.json mentioned in the issue do not work:
1. Menu. It is only possible to add a launch.json configuration template via a debug adapter. And anyway it's only a template and it is impossible to specify arguments from an extension.
2. DebugConfigurationProvider. The exact opposite situation: it is possible to specify all debug session settings, but it is impossible to export these settings to launch.json.
Separate `"rust-analyzer.newDebugConfig"` command looks better for me.
----
Fixes#4450Fixes#3441
Co-authored-by: vsrs <vit@conrlab.com>
Co-authored-by: vsrs <62505555+vsrs@users.noreply.github.com>
4397: Textmate cooperation r=matklad a=georgewfraser
This PR tweaks the fallback TextMate scopes to make them more consistent with the existing grammar and other languages, and edits the builtin TextMate grammar to align with semantic coloring. Before is on the left, after is on the right:
<img width="855" alt="Screen Shot 2020-05-10 at 1 45 51 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1369240/81512320-a8be7e80-92d4-11ea-8940-2c03f6769015.png">
**Use keyword.other for regular keywords instead of keyword**. This is a really peculiar quirk of TextMate conventions, but virtually *all* TextMate grammars use `keyword.other` (colored blue in VSCode Dark+) for regular keywords and `keyword.control` (colored purple in VSCode Dark+) for control keywords. The TextMate scope `keyword` is colored like control keywords, not regular keywords. It may seem strange that the `keyword` scope is not the right fallback for the `keyword` semantic token, but TextMate has a long and weird history. Note how keywords change from purple back to blue (what they were before semantic coloring was added):
**(1) Use punctuation.section.embedded for format specifiers**. This aligns with how Typescript colors formatting directives:
<img width="238" alt="Screen Shot 2020-05-09 at 10 54 01 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1369240/81481258-93b5f280-91e3-11ea-99c2-c6d258c5bcad.png">
**(2) Consistently use `entity.name.type.*` scopes for type names**. Avoid using `entity.name.*` which gets colored like a keyword.
**(3) Use Property instead of Member for fields**. Property and Member are very similar, but if you look at the TextMate fallback scopes, it's clear that Member is intended for function-like-things (methods?) and Property is intended for variable-like-things.
**(4) Color `for` as a regular keyword when it's part of `impl Trait for Struct`**.
**(5) Use `variable.other.constant` for constants instead of `entity.name.constant`**. In the latest VSCode insiders, variable.other.constant has a subtly different color that differentiates constants from ordinary variables. It looks close to the green of types but it's not the same---it's a new color recently added to take advantage of semantic coloring.
I also made some minor changes that make the TextMate scopes better match the semantic scopes. The effect of this for the user is you observe less of a change when semantic coloring "activates". You can see the changes I made relative to the built-in TextMate grammar here:
a91d15c80c..97428b6d52 (diff-6966c729b862f79f79bf7258eb3e0885)
Co-authored-by: George Fraser <george@fivetran.com>
