11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bors
1dea8834cc auto merge of #14364 : alexcrichton/rust/libdebug, r=brson
This commit moves reflection (as well as the {:?} format modifier) to a new
libdebug crate, all of which is marked experimental.

This is a breaking change because it now requires the debug crate to be
explicitly linked if the :? format qualifier is used. This means that any code
using this feature will have to add `extern crate debug;` to the top of the
crate. Any code relying on reflection will also need to do this.

Closes #12019

[breaking-change]
2014-05-27 21:46:46 -07:00
Alex Crichton
b53454e2e4 Move std::{reflect,repr,Poly} to a libdebug crate
This commit moves reflection (as well as the {:?} format modifier) to a new
libdebug crate, all of which is marked experimental.

This is a breaking change because it now requires the debug crate to be
explicitly linked if the :? format qualifier is used. This means that any code
using this feature will have to add `extern crate debug;` to the top of the
crate. Any code relying on reflection will also need to do this.

Closes #12019

[breaking-change]
2014-05-27 21:44:51 -07:00
Alan Andrade
99744653d5 get over bold text madness, changes per PR, brought the "returning pointers" section back to pointers guide 2014-05-24 13:15:48 -07:00
Alan Andrade
64dad2cb03 Cleanup lifetime guide
Clean pointers guide
2014-05-23 18:52:06 -07:00
Kevin Butler
6bfe361de2 guide-pointers: minor nits 2014-05-16 15:40:21 +01:00
Patrick Walton
090040bf40 librustc: Remove ~EXPR, ~TYPE, and ~PAT from the language, except
for `~str`/`~[]`.

Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for
`Box<self>` before the snapshot.

How to update your code:

* Instead of `~EXPR`, you should write `box EXPR`.

* Instead of `~TYPE`, you should write `Box<Type>`.

* Instead of `~PATTERN`, you should write `box PATTERN`.

[breaking-change]
2014-05-06 23:12:54 -07:00
Kevin Butler
74392246ff Remove comment about semicolons for inner attributes from docs and adjust comments. 2014-05-03 21:24:06 +01:00
Brandon Waskiewicz
58ae1e7c62 Remove rule that is confusing
The original text stated that one should only return a unique or managed pointer if you were given one in the first place. This makes it sound as if the function *should* return a unique pointer if it were given a unique pointer. The rest of the section goes on to describe why this is bad, and the example of bad code does exactly what the rule just said to do.

I reworded the original rule into a reference to the more concise rule mentioned at the bottom of the section, which helps add emphasis (a la 'it bears repeating').
2014-04-17 16:59:58 -04:00
Manish Goregaokar
d0aed0995b Update tutorials to use new attribute syntax (#13476) 2014-04-12 09:03:39 +05:30
Daniel Micay
8ca5caf4d9 num: rm wrapping of Float methods as functions
The `Float` trait methods will be usable as functions via UFCS, and
we came to a consensus to remove duplicate functions like this a long
time ago.

It does still make sense to keep the duplicate functions when the trait
methods are static, unless the decision to leave out the in-scope trait
name resolution for static methods changes.
2014-03-31 17:41:52 -04:00
Alex Crichton
864b434bfa Move doc/ to src/doc/
We generate documentation into the doc/ directory, so we shouldn't be
intermingling source files with generated files
2014-02-02 10:59:14 -08:00