Move async closure parameters into the resultant closure's future eagerly
Move async closure parameters into the closure's resultant future eagerly.
Before, we used to desugar `async |p1, p2, ..| { body }` as `|p1, p2, ..| { || async { body } }`. Now, we desugar the above like `|p1, p2, ..| { async move { let p1 = p1; let p2 = p2; ... body } }`. This mirrors the same desugaring that `async fn` does with its parameter types, and the compiler literally uses the same code via a shared helper function.
This removes the necessity for E0708, since now expressions like `async |x: i32| { x }` will not give you confusing borrow errors.
This does *not* fix the case where async closures have self-borrows. This will come with a general implementation of async closures, which is still in the works.
r? oli-obk
Make tcx optional from StableMIR run macro and extend it to accept closures
Change `run` macro to avoid sometimes unnecessary dependency on `TyCtxt`, and introduce `run_with_tcx` to capture use cases where `tcx` is required. Additionally, extend both macros to accept closures that may capture variables.
I've also modified the `internal()` method to make it safer, by accepting the type context to force the `'tcx` lifetime to match the context lifetime.
These are non-backward compatible changes, but they only affect internal APIs which are provided today as helper functions until we have a stable API to start the compiler.
Detect `NulInCStr` error earlier.
By making it an `EscapeError` instead of a `LitError`. This makes it like the other errors produced when checking string literals contents, e.g. for invalid escape sequences or bare CR chars.
NOTE: this means these errors are issued earlier, before expansion, which changes behaviour. It will be possible to move the check back to the later point if desired. If that happens, it's likely that all the string literal contents checks will be delayed together.
One nice thing about this: the old approach had some code in `report_lit_error` to calculate the span of the nul char from a range. This code used a hardwired `+2` to account for the `c"` at the start of a C string literal, but this should have changed to a `+3` for raw C string literals to account for the `cr"`, which meant that the caret in `cr"` nul error messages was one short of where it should have been. The new approach doesn't need any of this and avoids the off-by-one error.
r? ```@fee1-dead```
Update cargo
2 commits in 1cff2ee6b92e0ad3f87c44b70b28f788b2528b3c..1ae631085f01c1a72d05df1ec81f3759a8360042
2024-01-16 16:56:57 +0000 to 2024-01-17 17:26:41 +0000
- fix(json-msg): use pkgid spec in in JSON messages (rust-lang/cargo#13311)
- doc(features): Highlight the non-blocking feature gating technique (rust-lang/cargo#13307)
r? oli-obk
Could you check if this fixes miri build?
The advantage of this is that it does not need to be assigned to a
variable to be used in a `Context` creation, which is the most common
thing to want to do with a noop waker.
If an owned noop waker is desired, it can be created by cloning, but the
reverse is harder. Alternatively, both versions could be provided, like
`futures::task::noop_waker()` and `futures::task::noop_waker_ref()`, but
that seems to me to be API clutter for a very small benefit, whereas
having the `&'static` reference available is a large benefit.
Previous discussion on the tracking issue starting here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98286#issuecomment-1862159766
pat_analysis: Don't rely on contiguous `VariantId`s outside of rustc
Today's pattern_analysis uses `BitSet` and `IndexVec` on the provided enum variant ids, which only makes sense if these ids count the variants from 0. In rust-analyzer, the variant ids are global interning ids, which would make `BitSet` and `IndexVec` ridiculously wasteful. In this PR I add some shims to use `FxHashSet`/`FxHashMap` instead outside of rustc.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
Fix `rustc_abi` build on stable
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119446 broke the ability of `rustc_abi` to build on stable, which is required by rust-analyzer. This fixes it.
Construct closure type eagerly
Construct the returned closure type *before* checking the body, in the same match as we were previously deducing the coroutine types based off of the closure kind.
This simplifies some changes I'm doing in the async closure PR, and imo just seems easier to read (since we only need one match on closure kind, instead of two). There's no reason I can tell that we needed to create the closure type *after* the body was checked.
~~This also has the side-effect of making it so that the universe of the closure synthetic infer vars are lower than any infer vars that come from checking the body. We can also get rid of `next_root_ty_var` hack from closure checking (though in general we still need this, #119106). cc ```@lcnr``` since you may care about this hack 😆~~
r? ```@oli-obk```
Gracefully handle missing typeck information if typeck errored
fixes#116893
I created some logs and the typeck of `fn main` is exactly the same, no matter whether the constant's body is what it is, or if it is replaced with `panic!()`. The latter will cause the ICE not to be emitted though. The reason for that is that we abort compilation if *errors* were emitted, but not if *lint errors* were emitted. This took me way too long to debug, and is another reason why I would have liked https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/633
Consistently unset RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP when compiling bootstrap
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113906, all x.py invocations performed by rust-analyzer have RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 set. This was to fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112391#issuecomment-1597224941 — rust-analyzer uses some default cargo from the system when fetching workspace layout, and the standard library uses some unstable cargo feature, so x.py would previously fail if the system toolchain wasn't nightly.
82e1608dfa/library/std/Cargo.toml (L1)
This PR changes x.py to cancel out this RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 when compiling bootstrap. It will only remain set when running the compiled bootstrap executable. This fixes spurious bootstrap rebuilds in the event that a rust-analyzer x.py invocation is alternated with someone running x.py themself on the command line, if any dependency of bootstrap looks at `option_env!("RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP")`, which is the case since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119654.
**Before:**
```console
$ RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 ./x.py check library/core
Building bootstrap
Compiling proc-macro2 v1.0.76
Compiling quote v1.0.35
Compiling syn v2.0.48
Compiling clap_derive v4.4.7
Compiling serde_derive v1.0.195
Compiling clap v4.4.13
Compiling clap_complete v4.4.6
Compiling build_helper v0.1.0
Compiling bootstrap v0.0.0
Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 6.31s
Checking stage0 library artifacts {core} (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.23s
Build completed successfully in 0:00:07
$ ./x.py check library/core
Building bootstrap
Compiling proc-macro2 v1.0.76
Compiling quote v1.0.35
Compiling syn v2.0.48
Compiling clap_derive v4.4.7
Compiling serde_derive v1.0.195
Compiling clap v4.4.13
Compiling clap_complete v4.4.6
Compiling build_helper v0.1.0
Compiling bootstrap v0.0.0
Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 5.30s
Checking stage0 library artifacts {core} (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.25s
Build completed successfully in 0:00:06
```
**After:**
```console
$ RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 ./x.py check library/core
Building bootstrap
Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 0.06s
Checking stage0 library artifacts {core} (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.14s
Build completed successfully in 0:00:01
$ ./x.py check library/core
Building bootstrap
Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 0.04s
Checking stage0 library artifacts {core} (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.13s
Build completed successfully in 0:00:01
```
Don't ICE if TAIT-defining fn contains a closure with `_` in return type
The `delay_span_bug` got added in 0e82aaeb67 to reduce the amount of errors emitted for functions that have `_` in their return type, because inference doesn't apply to function items. But this logic shouldn't apply to closures, because their return types *can* be inferred.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119916.
Save liveness results for DestinationPropagation
`DestinationPropagation` needs to verify that merge candidates do not conflict with each other. This is done by verifying that a local is not live when its counterpart is written to.
To get the liveness information, the pass runs `MaybeLiveLocals` dataflow analysis repeatedly, once for each propagation round. This is quite costly, and the main driver for the perf impact on `ucd` and `diesel`. (See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115105#issuecomment-1689205908)
In order to mitigate this cost, this PR proposes to save the result of the analysis into a `SparseIntervalMatrix`, and mirror merges of locals into that matrix: `liveness(destination) := liveness(destination) union liveness(source)`.
<details>
<summary>Proof</summary>
We denote by `'` all the quantities of the transformed program. Let $\varphi$ be a mapping of locals, which maps `source` to `destination`, and is identity otherwise. The exact liveness set after a statement is $out'(statement)$, and the proposed liveness set is $\varphi(out(statement))$.
Consider a statement. Suppose that the output state verifies $out' \subset phi(out)$. We want to prove that $in' \subset \varphi(in)$ where $in = (out - kill) \cup gen$, and conclude by induction.
We have 2 cases: either that statement is kept with locals renumbered by $\varphi$, or it is a tautological assignment and it removed.
1. If the statement is kept: the gen-set and the kill-set of $statement' = \varphi(statement)$ are $gen' = \varphi(gen)$ and $kill' = \varphi(kill)$ exactly.
From soundness requirement 3, $\varphi(in)$ is disjoint from $\varphi(kill)$.
This implies that $\varphi(out - kill)$ is disjoint from $\varphi(kill)$, and so $\varphi(out - kill) = \varphi(out) - \varphi(kill)$. Then $\varphi(in) = (\varphi(out) - \varphi(kill)) \cup \varphi(gen) = (\varphi(out) - kill') \cup gen'$.
We can conclude that $out' \subset \varphi(out) \implies in' \subset \varphi(in)$.
2. If the statement is removed. As $\varphi(statement)$ is a tautological assignment, we know that $\varphi(gen) = \varphi(kill) = \\{ destination \\}$, while $gen' = kill' = \emptyset$. So $\varphi(in) = \varphi(out) \cup \\{ destination \\}$. Then $in' = out' \subset out \subset \varphi(in)$.
By recursion, we can conclude by that $in' \subset \varphi(in)$ everywhere.
</details>
This approximate liveness results is only suboptimal if there are locals that fully disappear from the CFG due to an assignment cycle. These cases are quite unlikely, so we do not bother with them.
This change allows to reduce the perf impact of DestinationPropagation by half on diesel and ucd (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115105#issuecomment-1694701904).
cc ````@JakobDegen````
tests: add sanity-check assembly test for every target
Fixes#119910.
Adds a basic assembly test checking that each target can produce assembly and update the target tier policy to require this.
cc rust-lang/compiler-team#655
r? `@wesleywiser`
Add way to express that no values are expected with check-cfg
This PR adds way to express no-values (no values expected) with `--check-cfg` by making empty `values()` no longer mean `values(none())` (internal: `&[None]`) and now be an empty list (internal: `&[]`).
### Context
Currently `--check-cfg` has a way to express that _any value is expected_ with `values(any())`, but has no way to do the inverse and say that _no value is expected_.
This would be particularly useful for build systems that control a config name and it's values as they could always declare a config name as expected and if in the current state they have values pass them and if not pass an empty list.
To give a more concrete example, Cargo `--check-cfg` currently needs to generate:
- `--check-cfg=cfg(feature, values(...))` for the case with declared features
- and `--check-cfg=cfg()` for the case without any features declared
This means that when there are no features declared, users will get an `unexpected config name` but from the point of view of Cargo the config name `feature` is expected, it's just that for now there aren't any values for it.
See [Cargo `check_cfg_args` function](92395d9010/src/cargo/core/compiler/mod.rs (L1263-L1281)) for more details.
### De-specializing *empty* `values()`
To solve this issue I propose that we "de-specialize" empty `values()` to no longer mean `values(none())` but to actually mean empty set/list. This is one of the last source of confusion for my-self and others with the `--check-cfg` syntax.
> The confusing part here is that an empty `values()` currently means the same as `values(none())`, i.e. an expected list of values with the _none_ variant (as in `#[cfg(name)]` where the value is none) instead of meaning an empty set.
Before the new `cfg()` syntax, defining the _none_ variant was only possible under certain circumstances, so in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111068 I decided to make `values()` to mean the _none_ variant, but it is no longer necessary since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119473 which introduced the `none()` syntax.
A simplified representation of the proposed "de-specialization" would be:
| Syntax | List/set of expected values |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| `cfg(name)`/`cfg(name, values(none()))` | `&[None]` |
| `cfg(name, values())` | `&[]` |
Note that I have my-self made the mistake of using an empty `values()` as meaning empty set, see https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/13011.
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@petrochenkov`
cc `@epage`
In LLVM 17, PowerPC targets started including function pointer alignments
in data layouts, and in Rust's update to that version (#114048), we added
the function pointer alignments. `powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl` had
`Fi64` set but this seems incorrect, and the code in LLVM would always
have computed `Fn32` because it is a MUSL target.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Adds a basic assembly test checking that each target can produce assembly
and update the target tier policy to require this.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Rework how diagnostic lints are stored.
`Diagnostic::code` has the type `DiagnosticId`, which has `Error` and
`Lint` variants. Plus `Diagnostic::is_lint` is a bool, which should be
redundant w.r.t. `Diagnostic::code`.
Seems simple. Except it's possible for a lint to have an error code, in
which case its `code` field is recorded as `Error`, and `is_lint` is
required to indicate that it's a lint. This is what happens with
`derive(LintDiagnostic)` lints. Which means those lints don't have a
lint name or a `has_future_breakage` field because those are stored in
the `DiagnosticId::Lint`.
It's all a bit messy and confused and seems unintentional.
This commit:
- removes `DiagnosticId`;
- changes `Diagnostic::code` to `Option<String>`, which means both
errors and lints can straightforwardly have an error code;
- changes `Diagnostic::is_lint` to `Option<IsLint>`, where `IsLint` is a
new type containing a lint name and a `has_future_breakage` bool, so
all lints can have those, error code or not.
r? `@oli-obk`
fix fn/const items implied bounds and wf check (rebase)
A rebase of #104098, see that PR for discussion. This is pretty much entirely the work of `@aliemjay.` I received his permission for this rebase.
---
These are two distinct changes (edit: actually three, see below):
1. Wf-check all fn item args. This is a soundness fix.
Fixes#104005
2. Use implied bounds from impl header in borrowck of associated functions/consts. This strictly accepts more code and helps to mitigate the impact of other breaking changes.
Fixes#98852Fixes#102611
The first is a breaking change and will likely have a big impact without the the second one. See the first commit for how it breaks libstd.
Landing the second one without the first will allow more incorrect code to pass. For example an exploit of #104005 would be as simple as:
```rust
use core::fmt::Display;
trait ExtendLt<Witness> {
fn extend(self) -> Box<dyn Display>;
}
impl<T: Display> ExtendLt<&'static T> for T {
fn extend(self) -> Box<dyn Display> {
Box::new(self)
}
}
fn main() {
let val = (&String::new()).extend();
println!("{val}");
}
```
The third change is to to check WF of user type annotations before normalizing them (fixes#104764, fixes#104763). It is mutually dependent on the second change above: an attempt to land it separately in #104746 caused several crater regressions that can all be mitigated by using the implied from the impl header. It is also necessary for the soundness of associated consts that use the implied bounds of impl header. See #104763 and how the third commit fixes the soundness issue in `tests/ui/wf/wf-associated-const.rs` that was introduces by the previous commit.
r? types
