compiletest: properly handle revisioned run-rustfix tests
Before this PR, if you have a revisioned `//@ run-rustfix` test like `//`@[foo]` run-rustfix`, you would run into an error saying crate name cannot contain `.` characters because the fixed test file trying to be compiled is named `<test-name>.<revision>.fixed`, from which `rustc` infers the crate name to be `<test-name>.<revision>` which is not a valid crate name.
This PR fixes the problem by constructing a synthetic crate name from `<test-name>.<revision>`, by
1. replacing all `-` with `_`, and
2. replacing all `.` with `__`
and pass that constructed crate name with `--crate-name` to rustc to compile the fixed file.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123596.
Rollup of 2 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #123584 (Emit an error when `rustc_doc_primitive` has an unknown value)
- #123589 (sys_common::thread_local_key: make a note that this is not used on Windows)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
sys_common::thread_local_key: make a note that this is not used on Windows
This just confused me for a while. I don't have the time to clean it up but I can at least leave a note for the next wary traveler.
Use unchecked_sub in str indexing
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108763 applied this logic to indexing for slices, but of course `str` has its own separate impl.
Found this by skimming over the codegen for https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris/; their dist builds enable overflow checks so the lack of `unchecked_sub` was producing an impossible-to-hit overflow check and also inhibiting some inlining.
r? scottmcm
This particular cast appears to have been copied over from clang, but there are
plenty of other call sites in clang that don't bother with a cast here, and it
works fine without one.
For context, `llvm::Intrinsic::ID` is a typedef for `unsigned`, and
`llvm::Intrinsic::instrprof_increment` is a member of
`enum IndependentIntrinsics : unsigned`.
Save/restore more items in cache with incremental compilation
Right now they don't play very well together, consider a simple example:
```
$ export RUSTFLAGS="--emit asm"
$ cargo new --lib foo
Created library `foo` package
$ cargo build -q
$ touch src/lib.rs
$ cargo build
error: could not copy
"/path/to/foo/target/debug/deps/foo-e307cc7fa7b6d64f.4qbzn9k8mosu50a5.rcgu.s"
to "/path/to/foo/target/debug/deps/foo-e307cc7fa7b6d64f.s":
No such file or directory (os error 2)
```
Touch triggers the rebuild, incremental compilation detects no changes (yay) and everything explodes while trying to copy files were they should go.
This pull request fixes it by copying and restoring more files in the incremental compilation cache
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89149
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88829
Related: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/interaction-between-incremental-compilation-and-emit/20551
Add `f16` and `f128` to rustdoc's `PrimitiveType`
Fix a few places where these primitives were missing from librustdoc. This should fix the CI failures from doc links in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122470.
Fix incorrect 'llvm_target' value used on watchOS target
## Issue
`xcodebuild -create-xcframework` command doesn't recognize static libraries that are built on "arm64_32-apple-watchos" target.
Here are steps to reproduce the issue on a Mac:
1. Install nightly toolchain `nightly-2024-03-27`. Needs this specific version, because newer nightly versions are broken on watchos target.
1. Create an empty library: `mkdir watchos-lib && cd watchos-lib && cargo init --lib`.
1. Add configuration `lib.crate-type=["staticlib"]` to Cargo.toml.
1. Build the library: `cargo +nightly-2024-03-27 build --release -Zbuild-std --target arm64_32-apple-watchos`
1. Run `xcodebuild -create-xcframework` to put the static library into a xcframework, which results in an error:
```
$ xcodebuild -create-xcframework -library target/arm64_32-apple-watchos/release/libwatchos_lib.a -output test.xcframework
error: unable to determine the platform for the given binary '.../watchos-lib/target/arm64_32-apple-watchos/release/libwatchos_lib.a'; check your deployment version settings
```
## Fix
The root cause of this error is `xcodebuild` couldn't read `LC_BUILD_VERSION` from the static library to determine the library's target platform. And the reason it's missing is that an incorrect `llvm_target` value is used in `arm64_32-apple-watchos` target. The expected value is `<arch>-apple-watchos<major>.<minor>.0`, i.e. "arm64_32-apple-watchos8.0.0".
The [.../apple/mod.rs](43f4f2a3b1/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/base/apple/mod.rs (L321)) file contains functions that construct such string. There is an existing function `watchos_sim_llvm_target` which returns llvm target value for watchOS simulator. But there is none for watchOS device. This PR adds that missing function to align watchOS with other Apple platform targets.
To verify the fix, you can simply build a toolchain on this PR branch and repeat the steps above using the built local toolchain to verify the `xcodebuild -create-xcframework` command can create a xcframework successfully.
Furthermore, you can verify `LC_BUILD_VERSION` contains correct info by using the simple shell script below to print `LC_BUILD_VERSION` of the static library that's built on watchos target:
```shell
bin=target/arm64_32-apple-watchos/release/libwatchos_lib.a
file=$(ar -t "$bin" | grep -E '\.o$' | head -n 1)
ar -x "$bin" "$file"
vtool -show-build-version "$file"
```
Here is an example output from my machine:
```
watchos_rust-495d6aaf3bccc08d.watchos_rust.35ba42bf9255ca9d-cgu.0.rcgu.o:
Load command 1
cmd LC_BUILD_VERSION
cmdsize 24
platform WATCHOS
minos 8.0
sdk n/a
ntools 0
```
Remove sharding for VecCache
This sharding is never used (per the comment in code). If we re-add sharding at some point in the future this is cheap to restore, but for now no need for the extra complexity.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #119224 (Drop panic hook after running tests)
- #123411 (Put checks that detect UB under their own flag below debug_assertions)
- #123516 (Do not ICE on field access check on expr with `ty::Error`)
- #123522 (Stabilize const Atomic*::into_inner)
- #123559 (Add a debug asserts call to match_projection_projections to ensure invariant)
- #123563 (Rewrite `version` test run-make as an UI test)
Failed merges:
- #123569 (Move some tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rewrite `version` test run-make as an UI test
Claiming the simple `version` test from #121876.
Reasoning: As discussed in #123297, 10 years ago, some changes to CLI flags warranted the creation of the `version` test. Since it's not actually executing the compiled binary, it has no purpose being a `run-make` test and should instead be an UI test.
This is the exact same change as it was shown on my closed PR #123297. Changes were ready, but I did a major Git mishap while trying to fix a tidy error and messed up my branch. The details of this error are explained [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123297#issuecomment-2041152379).
Add a debug asserts call to match_projection_projections to ensure invariant
Small nit as follow up of #123471.
r? `@compiler-errors`
`@bors` rollup=always
Stabilize const Atomic*::into_inner
Partial stabilization for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78729, for which the FCP has already completed.
The other `into_inner` functions in that tracking issue (`UnsafeCell`, `Cell`, `RefCell`) are blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73255 for now.
```console
error[E0493]: destructor of `UnsafeCell<T>` cannot be evaluated at compile-time
--> library/core/src/cell.rs:2076:29
|
2076 | pub const fn into_inner(self) -> T {
| ^^^^ the destructor for this type cannot be evaluated in constant functions
2077 | self.value
2078 | }
| - value is dropped here
```
Drop panic hook after running tests
Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119223
Previously we left the panic hook we allocated
on main termination. Doing so makes Valgrind
report it as a reachable unfreed block.
In order to fix that use `panic::take_hook()` before examining test results.
Example backtrace:
```
==146594== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1
==146594== at 0x4A390C5: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:442)
==146594== by 0x151336: alloc (alloc.rs:98)
==146594== by 0x151336: alloc_impl (alloc.rs:181)
==146594== by 0x151336: allocate (alloc.rs:241)
==146594== by 0x151336: exchange_malloc (alloc.rs:330)
==146594== by 0x151336: new<test::test_main::{closure_env#0}> (boxed.rs:217)
==146594== by 0x151336: test::test_main (lib.rs:124)
==146594== by 0x1522F9: test::test_main_static (lib.rs:160)
==146594== by 0x11E102: reachable_block_with_cargo_test::main (lib.rs:1)
==146594== by 0x11EABA: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once (function.rs:250)
==146594== by 0x11E76D: std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace (backtrace.rs:154)
==146594== by 0x11DFC0: std::rt::lang_start::{{closure}} (rt.rs:166)
==146594== by 0x177D3A: call_once<(), (dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe)> (function.rs:284)
==146594== by 0x177D3A: do_call<&(dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe), i32> (panicking.rs:504)
==146594== by 0x177D3A: try<i32, &(dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe)> (panicking.rs:468)
==146594== by 0x177D3A: catch_unwind<&(dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe), i32> (panic.rs:142)
==146594== by 0x177D3A: {closure#2} (rt.rs:148)
==146594== by 0x177D3A: do_call<std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure_env#2}, isize> (panicking.rs:504)
==146594== by 0x177D3A: try<isize, std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure_env#2}> (panicking.rs:468)
==146594== by 0x177D3A: catch_unwind<std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure_env#2}, isize> (panic.rs:142)
==146594== by 0x177D3A: std::rt::lang_start_internal (rt.rs:148)
==146594== by 0x11DF99: std::rt::lang_start (rt.rs:165)
```
