remove pred_known_to_hold_modulo_regions
This commit is contained in:
parent
486c7b6a50
commit
399a258f46
@ -119,9 +119,7 @@ pub fn predicates_for_generics<'tcx>(
|
||||
|
||||
/// Determines whether the type `ty` is known to meet `bound` and
|
||||
/// returns true if so. Returns false if `ty` either does not meet
|
||||
/// `bound` or is not known to meet bound (note that this is
|
||||
/// conservative towards *no impl*, which is the opposite of the
|
||||
/// `evaluate` methods).
|
||||
/// `bound` or is not known to meet bound.
|
||||
pub fn type_known_to_meet_bound_modulo_regions<'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
@ -129,50 +127,8 @@ pub fn type_known_to_meet_bound_modulo_regions<'tcx>(
|
||||
def_id: DefId,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
let trait_ref = ty::TraitRef::new(infcx.tcx, def_id, [ty]);
|
||||
pred_known_to_hold_modulo_regions(infcx, param_env, trait_ref)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// FIXME(@lcnr): this function doesn't seem right and shouldn't exist?
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Ping me on zulip if you want to use this method and need help with finding
|
||||
/// an appropriate replacement.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(infcx, param_env, pred), ret)]
|
||||
fn pred_known_to_hold_modulo_regions<'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
pred: impl ToPredicate<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
let obligation = Obligation::new(infcx.tcx, ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, pred);
|
||||
|
||||
let result = infcx.evaluate_obligation_no_overflow(&obligation);
|
||||
debug!(?result);
|
||||
|
||||
if result.must_apply_modulo_regions() {
|
||||
true
|
||||
} else if result.may_apply() {
|
||||
// Sometimes obligations are ambiguous because the recursive evaluator
|
||||
// is not smart enough, so we fall back to fulfillment when we're not certain
|
||||
// that an obligation holds or not. Even still, we must make sure that
|
||||
// the we do no inference in the process of checking this obligation.
|
||||
let goal = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible((obligation.predicate, obligation.param_env));
|
||||
infcx.probe(|_| {
|
||||
let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(infcx);
|
||||
ocx.register_obligation(obligation);
|
||||
|
||||
let errors = ocx.select_all_or_error();
|
||||
match errors.as_slice() {
|
||||
// Only known to hold if we did no inference.
|
||||
[] => infcx.shallow_resolve(goal) == goal,
|
||||
|
||||
errors => {
|
||||
debug!(?errors);
|
||||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
let obligation = Obligation::new(infcx.tcx, ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, trait_ref);
|
||||
infcx.predicate_must_hold_modulo_regions(&obligation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx, elaborated_env))]
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user