Implement step 1 of rust-lang/rfcs#702
Allows the expression `..` (without either endpoint) in general, can be
used in slicing syntax `&expr[..]` where we previously wrote `&expr[]`.
The old syntax &expr[] is not yet removed or warned for.
This restructures tidy.py to walk the tree itself,
and improves performance considerably by not loading entire
files into buffers for licenseck.
Splits build rules into 'tidy', 'tidy-basic', 'tidy-binaries',
'tidy-errors', 'tidy-features'.
This is half of what @Aatch implemented in #21418. The non-null assumption is later canonicalized to !nonnull metadata and doesn't cause any slowdowns (in fact the build is slightly faster with this change). I left out the other half of #21418 because that still causes a ~16% increase in compile times (30m -> 35m).
This needs a snapshot that includes #21805 before it can be merged.
There are some places where type inference regressed after I removed the annotations (see `FIXME`s). cc @nikomatsakis.
r? @eddyb or anyone
(I'll remove the `FIXME`s before merging, as they are only intended to point out regressions)
On OSX the linker has a separate framework lookup path which is specified via
the `-F` flag. This adds a new kind of `-L` path recognized by the compiler for
frameworks to be passed through to the linker.
Closes#20259
Allows the expression `..` (without either endpoint) in general, can be
used in slicing syntax `&expr[..]` where we previously wrote `&expr[]`.
The old syntax &expr[] is not yet removed or warned for.
On OSX the linker has a separate framework lookup path which is specified via
the `-F` flag. This adds a new kind of `-L` path recognized by the compiler for
frameworks to be passed through to the linker.
Closes#20259
`{` and `}` aren’t valid characters on ARM, so this makes Unicode characters render as, e.g., `$u38d$` instead of `$u{38d}`.
This also fixes a small bug where `)` (**r**ight **p**arenthesis) and `*` (**r**aw **p**ointer) would both mangle to `$RP$`, making `)` show up as `*` in backtraces.
Currently, if a `#![staged_api]` crate contains an exported item without a stability marker (or inherited stability),
the item is useless.
This change introduces a check to ensure that all exported items have a defined stability.
it also introduces the `unmarked_api` feature, which lets users import unmarked features. While this PR should in theory forbid these from existing,
in practice we can't be so sure; so this lets users bypass this check instead of having to wait for the library and/or compiler to be fixed (since otherwise this is a hard error).
r? @aturon
This removes the `ByRef` iterator adaptor to stay in line with the changes to
`std::io`. The `by_ref` method instead just returns `&mut Self`.
This also removes the implementation of `Iterator for &mut Iterator` and instead
generalizes it to `Iterator for &mut I` where `I: Iterator + ?Sized`. The
`Box<I>` implementations were also updated.
This *almost* completes the job for #16440. The idea is that even if we do not know whether some closure type `C` implements `Fn` or `FnMut` (etc), we still know its argument and return types. So if we see an obligation `C : Fn(_0)`, we can unify `_0` with those argument types while still considering the obligation ambiguous and unsatisfied. This helps to make a lot of progress with type inference even before closure kind inference is done.
As part of this PR, the explicit `:` syntax is removed from the AST and completely ignored. We still infer the closure kind based on the expected type if that is available. There are several reasons for this. First, deciding the closure kind earlier is always better, as it allows us to make more progress. Second, this retains a (admittedly obscure) way for users to manually specify the closure kind, which is useful for writing tests if nothing else. Finally, there are still some cases where inference can fail, so it may be useful to have this manual override. (The expectation is that we will eventually revisit an explicit syntax for specifying the closure kind, but it will not be `:` and may be some sort of generalization of the `||` syntax to handle other traits as well.)
This commit does not *quite* fix#16640 because a snapshot is still needed to enable the obsolete syntax errors for explicit `&mut:` and friends.
r? @eddyb as he reviewed the prior patch in this direction
The extra check caused by the expect() call can, in general, not be
optimized away, because the length of the iterator is unknown at compile
time, causing a noticable slow-down. Since the check only triggers if
the element isn't actually found in the iterator, i.e. it isn't
guaranteed to trigger for ill-behaved ExactSizeIterators, it seems
reasonable to switch to an implementation that doesn't need the check
and just always returns None if the value isn't found.
Benchmark:
````rust
let v: Vec<u8> = (0..1024*65).map(|_| 0).collect();
b.iter(|| {
v.as_slice().iter().rposition(|&c| c == 1)
});
````
Before:
````
test rposition ... bench: 49939 ns/iter (+/- 23)
````
After:
````
test rposition ... bench: 33306 ns/iter (+/- 68)
````
`{` and `}` aren’t valid characters on ARM.
This also fixes a small bug where `)` (**r**ight **p**arenthesis) and `*`
(**r**aw **p**ointer) would both mangle to `$RP$`, making `)` show up as `*` in
backtraces.
Building over night, posting for review now. Presumably not much should need change.
I consider this necessary to move forward with a proper stabilization of the API.
r? @huonw
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 576][rfc] which adds back the `std::io`
module to the standard library. No functionality in `std::old_io` has been
deprecated just yet, and the new `std::io` module is behind the same `io`
feature gate.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/576
A good bit of functionality was copied over from `std::old_io`, but many tweaks
were required for the new method signatures. Behavior such as precisely when
buffered objects call to the underlying object may have been tweaked slightly in
the transition. All implementations were audited to use composition wherever
possible. For example the custom `pos` and `cap` cursors in `BufReader` were
removed in favor of just using `Cursor<Vec<u8>>`.
A few liberties were taken during this implementation which were not explicitly
spelled out in the RFC:
* The old `LineBufferedWriter` is now named `LineWriter`
* The internal representation of `Error` now favors OS error codes (a
0-allocation path) and contains a `Box` for extra semantic data.
* The io prelude currently reexports `Seek` as `NewSeek` to prevent conflicts
with the real prelude reexport of `old_io::Seek`
* The `chars` method was moved from `BufReadExt` to `ReadExt`.
* The `chars` iterator returns a custom error with a variant that explains that
the data was not valid UTF-8.
This PR implements [path reform](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/474), and motivation and details for the change can be found there.
For convenience, the old path API is being kept as `old_path` for the time being. Updating after this PR is just a matter of changing imports to `old_path` (which is likely not needed, since the prelude entries still export the old path API).
This initial PR does not include additional normalization or platform-specific path extensions. These will be done in follow up commits or PRs.
[breaking-change]
Closes#20034Closes#12056Closes#11594Closes#14028Closes#14049Closes#10035
Implements [RFC 474](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/474); see
that RFC for details/motivation for this change.
This initial commit does not include additional normalization or
platform-specific path extensions. These will be done in follow up
commits or PRs.
Use the crates.io crate `rand` (version 0.1 should be a drop in
replacement for `std::rand`) and `rand_macros` (`#[derive_Rand]` should
be a drop-in replacement).
[breaking-change]
As part of [RFC 474](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/474), this
commit renames `std::path` to `std::old_path`, leaving the existing path
API in place to ease migration to the new one. Updating should be as
simple as adjusting imports, and the prelude still maps to the old path
APIs for now.
[breaking-change]
