rustdoc: Replace `FakeDefId` with new `ItemId` type
Follow up from #84707
`@Manishearth` [suggested](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84707#issuecomment-831994669) that there should be a new `ItemId` type that can distinguish between auto traits, normal ids, and blanket impls instead of using `FakeDefId`s.
This type is introduced by this PR.
There are still some `FIXME`s left, because I was unsure what the best solution for them would be.
Especially the naming in general now is a bit weird right now and needs to be cleaned up. Now there are no "fake" ids so the `is_fake` method on `Item` does not really make sense and maybe the methods on `ItemId` should be renamed too?
Also, we need to represent the new item ids in the JSON backend somehow.
Remove `impl Clean for {Ident, Symbol}`
These were only used once, in a place where it was trivial to replace.
Also, it's unclear what 'clean' would mean for these, so it seems better
to be explicit.
Found while reviewing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86841, which makes the same change to `build_macro`, so the two will conflict.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
Remove some doc aliases
As per the new doc alias policy in https://github.com/rust-lang/std-dev-guide/pull/25, this removes some controversial doc aliases:
- `malloc`, `alloc`, `realloc`, etc.
- `length` (alias for `len`)
- `delete` (alias for `remove` in collections and also file/directory deletion)
r? `@joshtriplett`
Stabilize `Seek::rewind()`
This stabilizes `Seek::rewind`. It seemed to fit into one of the existing tests, so I extended that test rather than adding a new one.
Closes#85149.
aborts: Clarify documentation and comments
In the docs for intrinsics::abort():
* Strengthen the recommendation by to use process::abort instead.
* Document the fact that it sometimes (ab)uses an LLVM debug trap and what the likely consequences are.
* State that the precise behaviour is unstable.
In the docs for process::abort():
* Promise that we have the same behaviour as C `abort()`.
* Document the likely consequences, including, specifically, the consequences on Unix.
In the internal comment for unix::abort_internal:
* Refer to the public docs for the public API functions.
* Correct and expand the description of libc::abort. Specifically:
* Do not claim that abort() unregisters signal handlers. It doesn't; it honours the SIGABRT handler.
* Discuss, extensively, the issue with abort() flushing stdio buffers.
* Describe the glibc behaviour in some detail.
Co-authored-by: Mark Wooding <mdw@distorted.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Fixes#40230
Add std::os::unix::fs::DirEntryExt2::file_name_ref(&self) -> &OsStr
Greetings!
This is my first PR here, so please forgive me if I've missed an important step or otherwise done something wrong. I'm very open to suggestions/fixes/corrections.
This PR adds a function that allows `std::fs::DirEntry` to vend a borrow of its filename on Unix platforms, which is especially useful for sorting. (Windows has (as I understand it) encoding differences that require an allocation.) This new function sits alongside the cross-platform [`file_name(&self) -> OsString`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fs/struct.DirEntry.html#method.file_name) function.
I pitched this idea in an [internals thread](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/allow-std-direntry-to-vend-borrows-of-its-filename/14328/4), and no one objected vehemently, so here we are.
I understand features in general, I believe, but I'm not at all confident that my whole-cloth invention of a new feature string (as required by the compiler) was correct (or that the name is appropriate). Further, there doesn't appear to be a test for the sibling `ino` function, so I didn't add one for this similarly trivial function either. If it's desirable that I should do so, I'd be happy to [figure out how to] do that.
The following is a trivial sample of a use-case for this function, in which directory entries are sorted without any additional allocations:
```rust
use std::os::unix::fs::DirEntryExt;
use std::{fs, io};
fn main() -> io::Result<()> {
let mut entries = fs::read_dir(".")?.collect::<Result<Vec<_>, io::Error>>()?;
entries.sort_unstable_by(|a, b| a.file_name_ref().cmp(b.file_name_ref()));
for p in entries {
println!("{:?}", p);
}
Ok(())
}
```
Query-ify global limit attribute handling
Currently, we read various 'global limits' from inner attributes the crate root (`recursion_limit`, `move_size_limit`, `type_length_limit`, `const_eval_limit`). These limits are then stored in `Sessions`, allowing them to be access from a `TyCtxt` without registering a dependency on the crate root attributes.
This PR moves the calculation of these global limits behind queries, so that we properly track dependencies on crate root attributes. During the setup of macro expansion (before we've created a `TyCtxt`), we need to access the recursion limit, which is now done by directly calling into the code shared by the normal query implementations.
These were only used once, in a place where it was trivial to replace.
Also, it's unclear what 'clean' would mean for these, so it seems better
to be explicit.
And withdraw the allegation of "abuse".
Adapted from a suggestion by @m-ou-se.
Co-authored-by: Mara Bos <m-ou.se@m-ou.se>
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
In the docs for intrinsics::abort():
* Strengthen the recommendation by to use process::abort instead.
* Document the fact that it (ab)uses an LLVM debug trap and what the
likely consequences are.
* State that the precise behaviour is unstable.
In the docs for process::abort():
* Promise that we have the same behaviour as C `abort()`.
* Document the likely consequences, including, specifically, the
consequences on Unix.
In the internal comment for unix::abort_internal:
* Refer to the public docs for the public API functions.
* Correct and expand the description of libc::abort. Specifically:
* Do not claim that abort() unregisters signal handlers. It doesn't;
it honours the SIGABRT handler.
* Discuss, extensively, the issue with abort() flushing stdio buffers.
* Describe the glibc behaviour in some detail.
Co-authored-by: Mark Wooding <mdw@distorted.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86477 (E0716: clarify that equivalent code example is erroneous)
- #86623 (Add check to ensure error code explanations are not removed anymore even if not emitted)
- #86856 (Make x.py less verbose on failures)
- #86858 (Stabilize `string_drain_as_str`)
- #86859 (Add a regression test for issue-69323)
- #86862 (re-export SwitchIntEdgeEffects)
- #86864 (Add missing code example for Write::write_vectored)
- #86874 (Bump deps)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Bump deps
tidy: updated cargo_metadata to 0.12 (rustfmt only one left, that depends on 0.8 version in tree, waiting when it merges into rustc repo)
miow v0.3.6 -> v0.3.7, drops socket2 v0.3.19
curl v0.4.36 -> v0.4.38
curl-sys v0.4.42+curl-7.76.0 -> v0.4.44+curl-7.77.0
fixes CVE's https://curl.se/docs/vuln-7.76.0.html
Make x.py less verbose on failures
- Don't print the exact command run by rustbuild unless `--verbose` is set.
This is almost always unhelpful, since it's just cargo with a lot of
arguments (and you can't replicate it anyway unless you have the environment variables, which aren't printed by default).
- Don't print "Build completed unsuccessfully" unless --verbose is set.
You can already tell the build failed by the errors above, and the
time isn't particularly helpful.
- Don't print the full path to bootstrap. This is useless to everyone,
even including when working on x.py itself. You can still opt-in to
this being shown with `--verbose`, since it will throw an exception.
Before:
```
error[E0432]: unresolved import `x`
--> library/std/src/lib.rs:343:5
|
343 | use x;
| ^ no external crate `x`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0432`.
error: could not compile `std`
To learn more, run the command again with --verbose.
command did not execute successfully: "/home/joshua/rustc4/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "check" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "-Zbinary-dep-depinfo" "-j" "8" "--release" "--features" "panic-unwind backtrace" "--manifest-path" "/home/joshua/rustc4/library/test/Cargo.toml" "--message-format" "json-render-diagnostics"
expected success, got: exit status: 101
failed to run: /home/joshua/rustc4/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap check
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:00:13
```
After:
```
error[E0432]: unresolved import `x`
--> library/std/src/lib.rs:343:5
|
343 | use x;
| ^ no external crate `x`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0432`.
error: could not compile `std`
To learn more, run the command again with --verbose.
```
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86854, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86022
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Add check to ensure error code explanations are not removed anymore even if not emitted
The error explanations are useful in case you use older version of the compiler. Even more if they had an explanation. If they are not emitted, their explanations should be updated but not removed (as we did for a few of them, like E0001).
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
E0716: clarify that equivalent code example is erroneous
In E0716, there is a code block that is equivalent to the erroneous
code example. Especially when viewed with `rustc --explain`, it's
not obvious that it is also erroneous, and some users have been
confused when they try to change their code to match the erroneous
equivalent.
`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics +D-newcomer-roadblock +T-compiler
