Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113241 (rustdoc: Document lack of object safety on affected traits)
- #117388 (Turn const_caller_location from a query to a hook)
- #117417 (Add a stable MIR visitor)
- #117439 (prepopulate opaque ty storage before using it)
- #117451 (Add support for pre-unix-epoch file dates on Apple platforms (#108277))
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Update cargo
7 commits in 708383d620e183a9ece69b8fe930c411d83dee27..b4d18d4bd3db6d872892f6c87c51a02999b80802
2023-10-27 21:09:26 +0000 to 2023-10-31 18:19:10 +0000
- refactor(toml): Cleanup noticed on the way to rust-lang/cargo#12801 (rust-lang/cargo#12902)
- feat(trim-paths): set env `CARGO_TRIM_PATHS` for build scripts (rust-lang/cargo#12900)
- feat: implement RFC 3127 `-Ztrim-paths` (rust-lang/cargo#12625)
- docs: clarify config to use vendored source is printed to stdout (rust-lang/cargo#12893)
- Improve the margin calculation for the search command's UI (rust-lang/cargo#12890)
- Add new packages to [workspace.members] automatically (rust-lang/cargo#12779)
- refactor(toml): Decouple parsing from interning system (rust-lang/cargo#12881)
r? ghost
Add support for pre-unix-epoch file dates on Apple platforms (#108277)
Please note that even though the assertion being hit is the same on MacOS and thus similar to what's described in #108277, on MacOS it's possible to convert the numbers such that they are valid, don't hit the assertion and are round-trippable.
Doing so effectively fixes the issue on Apple platforms.
This PR does not attempt to harden other platforms against negative nanoseconds, which can happen for many reasons including mild filesystem corruption.
----
Time in UNIX system calls counts from the epoch, 1970-01-01. The timespec
struct used in various system calls represents this as a number of seconds and
a number of nanoseconds. Nanoseconds are required to be between 0 and
999_999_999, because the portion outside that range should be represented in
the seconds field; if nanoseconds were larger than 999_999_999, the seconds
field should go up instead.
Suppose you ask for the time 1969-12-31, what time is that? On UNIX systems
that support times before the epoch, that's seconds=-86400, one day before the
epoch. But now, suppose you ask for the time 1969-12-31 23:59:00.1. In other
words, a tenth of a second after one minute before the epoch. On most UNIX
systems, that's represented as seconds=-60, nanoseconds=100_000_000. The macOS
bug is that it returns seconds=-59, nanoseconds=-900_000_000.
While that's in some sense an accurate description of the time (59.9 seconds
before the epoch), that violates the invariant of the timespec data structure:
nanoseconds must be between 0 and 999999999. This causes this assertion in the
Rust standard library.
So, on macOS, if we get a Timespec value with seconds less than or equal to
zero, and nanoseconds between -999_999_999 and -1 (inclusive), we can add
1_000_000_000 to the nanoseconds and subtract 1 from the seconds, and then
convert. The resulting timespec value is still accepted by macOS, and when fed
back into the OS, produces the same results. (If you set a file's mtime with
that timestamp, then read it back, you get back the one with negative
nanoseconds again.)
Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
prepopulate opaque ty storage before using it
doesn't have any significant impact rn afaict, as we freely define new opaque types during MIR typeck.
It will be relevant with #117278 and once we stop allowing the definition of new opaques in MIR typeck
r? `@compiler-errors`
rustdoc: Document lack of object safety on affected traits
Closes#85138
I saw the issue didn't have any recent activity, if there is another MR for it I missed it.
I want the issue to move forward so here is my proposition.
It takes some space just before the "Implementors" section and only if the trait is **not** object
safe since it is the only case where special care must be taken in some cases and this has the
benefit of avoiding generation of HTML in (I hope) the common case.
Accept less invalid Rust in rustdoc
pulled out of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117213 where this change was already approved
This only affects rustdoc, and has up to [20% perf regressions in rustdoc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117213#issuecomment-1785776288). These are unavoidable, as we are simply doing more checks now, but it's part of the longer term plan of making rustdoc more resistant to ICEs by only accepting valid Rust code.
Time in UNIX system calls counts from the epoch, 1970-01-01. The timespec
struct used in various system calls represents this as a number of seconds and
a number of nanoseconds. Nanoseconds are required to be between 0 and
999_999_999, because the portion outside that range should be represented in
the seconds field; if nanoseconds were larger than 999_999_999, the seconds
field should go up instead.
Suppose you ask for the time 1969-12-31, what time is that? On UNIX systems
that support times before the epoch, that's seconds=-86400, one day before the
epoch. But now, suppose you ask for the time 1969-12-31 23:59:00.1. In other
words, a tenth of a second after one minute before the epoch. On most UNIX
systems, that's represented as seconds=-60, nanoseconds=100_000_000. The macOS
bug is that it returns seconds=-59, nanoseconds=-900_000_000.
While that's in some sense an accurate description of the time (59.9 seconds
before the epoch), that violates the invariant of the timespec data structure:
nanoseconds must be between 0 and 999999999. This causes this assertion in the
Rust standard library.
So, on macOS, if we get a Timespec value with seconds less than or equal to
zero, and nanoseconds between -999_999_999 and -1 (inclusive), we can add
1_000_000_000 to the nanoseconds and subtract 1 from the seconds, and then
convert. The resulting timespec value is still accepted by macOS, and when fed
back into the OS, produces the same results. (If you set a file's mtime with
that timestamp, then read it back, you get back the one with negative
nanoseconds again.)
Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Use derivative for `Clone`/`PartialOrd`/`Ord`/`Hash` in `rustc_type_ir`
This uses `derivative` to derive `Clone`/`PartialOrd`/`Ord`/`Hash` for types in `rustc_type_ir`. This doesn't derive `PartialEq`/`Eq` yet, because I have no idea why those are generating slower implementations from derivative.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116267 (Some codegen cleanups around SIMD checks)
- #116712 (When encountering unclosed delimiters during lexing, check for diff markers)
- #117416 (Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted)
- #117421 (coverage: Replace impossible `coverage::Error` with assertions)
- #117438 (Do not ICE on constant evaluation failure in GVN.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
coverage: Replace impossible `coverage::Error` with assertions
Historically, these errors existed so that the coverage debug code could dump additional information before reporting a compiler bug. That debug code was removed by #115962, so we can now simplify these methods by making them panic immediately when they detect a bug.
Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted
Not totally sure if this is the best solution. We could, alternatively, look at the hir typeck results and try to take a type from there instead of just falling back to type error, inferring `u8` instead of `{type error}`. Not certain it really matters, though.
Happy to iterate on this.
Fixes#117413
r? ``@oli-obk`` cc ``@Nadrieril``
Historically, these errors existed so that the coverage debug code could dump
additional information before reporting a compiler bug. That debug code was
removed by #115962, so we can now simplify these methods by making them panic
when they detect a bug.
Store #[deprecated] attribute's `since` value in parsed form
This PR implements the first followup bullet listed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117148#issue-1960240108.
We centralize error handling to the attribute parsing code in `compiler/rustc_attr/src/builtin.rs`, and thereby remove some awkward error codepaths from later phases of compilation that had to make sense of these #\[deprecated\] attributes, namely `compiler/rustc_passes/src/stability.rs` and `compiler/rustc_middle/src/middle/stability.rs`.
Enable cross-crate-inlining when MIR inlining is enabled
This would make https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117355 generally less obscure, and also seems like a good idea, even if for some reason someone wants MIR opts but no codegen opts.
Detect object safety errors when assoc type is missing
When an associated type with GATs isn't specified in a `dyn Trait`, emit an object safety error instead of only complaining about the missing associated type, as it will lead the user down a path of three different errors before letting them know that what they were trying to do is impossible to begin with.
Fix#103155.
When an associated type with GATs isn't specified in a `dyn Trait`, emit
an object safety error instead of only complaining about the missing
associated type, as it will lead the user down a path of three different
errors before letting them know that what they were trying to do is
impossible to begin with.
Fix#103155.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116862 (Detect when trait is implemented for type and suggest importing it)
- #117389 (Some diagnostics improvements of `gen` blocks)
- #117396 (Don't treat closures/coroutine types as part of the public API)
- #117398 (Correctly handle nested or-patterns in exhaustiveness)
- #117403 (Poison check_well_formed if method receivers are invalid to prevent typeck from running on it)
- #117411 (Improve some diagnostics around `?Trait` bounds)
- #117414 (Don't normalize to an un-revealed opaque when we hit the recursion limit)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't normalize to an un-revealed opaque when we hit the recursion limit
Currently, we will normalize `Opaque := Option<&Opaque>` to something like `Option<&Option<&Option<&...Opaque>>>`, hitting a limit and bottoming out in an unnormalized opaque after the recursion limit gets hit.
Unfortunately, during `layout_of`, we'll simply recurse and try again if the type normalizes to something different than the type:
e6e931dda5/compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/layout.rs (L58-L60)
That means then we'll try to normalize `Option<&Option<&Option<&...Opaque>>>` again, substituting `Opaque` into itself even deeper. Eventually this will get to the point that we're just stack-overflowing on a really deep type before even hitting an opaque again.
To fix this, we just bottom out into `ty::Error` instead of the unrevealed opaque type.
Fixes#117412
r? `@oli-obk`
Improve some diagnostics around `?Trait` bounds
* uses better spans
* clarifies a message that was only talking about generic params, but applies to `dyn ?Trait` and `impl ?Trait` as well
Poison check_well_formed if method receivers are invalid to prevent typeck from running on it
fixes#117379
Though if some code invokes typeck without having first invoked `check_well_formed` then we'll encounter this ICE again. This can happen in const and const fn bodies if they are evaluated due to other `check_well_formed` checks or similar
Correctly handle nested or-patterns in exhaustiveness
I had assumed nested or-patterns were flattened, and they mostly are but not always.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117378
