Rework suggestion generation of `unit_arg` lint
Found this bug while running `cargo fix --clippy` on quite a big codebase:
This would replace something like:
```rust
Some(fn_that_actually_does_something(&a, b))
```
with
```rust
Some(())
```
which obviously suppresses side effects.
Since pretty much every expression could have side effects, I think making this suggestion `MaybeIncorrect` is the best thing to do here.
A correct suggestion would be:
```rust
fn_that_actually_does_something(&a, b);
Some(())
```
Somehow the suggestion is not correctly applied to the arguments, when more than one argument is a unit value. I have to look into this a little more, though.
changelog: Fixes suggestion of `unit_arg` lint, so that it suggests semantic equivalent code
Fixes#4741
Increase cargo_metadata version to 0.9.1
`clippy_lints` makes use of `dep_kinds` on `NodeDep` but this was only
added in versoin 0.9.1. Compiling with 0.9.0 will fail because of this.
changelog: none
len_zero: skip ranges if feature `range_is_empty` is not enabled
If the feature is not enabled, calling `is_empty()` on a range is ambiguous. Moreover, the two possible resolutions are unstable methods, one inherent to the range and the other being part of the `ExactSizeIterator` trait.
Since `len_zero` only checks for existing `is_empty()` inherent methods, we only take into account the `range_is_empty` feature.
Related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48111#issuecomment-445132965
changelog: len_zero: avoid linting ranges without #![feature(range_is_empty)]
Fixes: #3807
cargo_dev: add ra-setup
It takes an absolute path to a rustc repo and adds path-dependencies
that point towards the respective rustc subcrates into the Cargo.tomls of
the clippy and clippy_lints crate.
This allows rustc-analyzer to show proper type annotations etc on rustc-internals inside the clippy repo.
Usage: cargo dev ra-setup /absolute/path/to/rust/
cc https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3517
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5514
changelog: none
Rustup
r? @matthiaskrgr
I finally got to doing the rustup. Sorry for taking so long, I was busy the last few days.
@ebroto FYI: I had to add b6c58f0 to make Clippy pass the rustc test suite.
changelog: none
Update Clippy, RLS, and rustfmt
r? @Dylan-DPC
This makes Clippy test-pass again: 3089c3b
Otherwise this includes bugfixes and a few new lints.
Fixes#72231Fixes#72232
Stabilize str_strip feature
This PR stabilizes these APIs:
```rust
impl str {
/// Returns a string slice with the prefix removed.
///
/// If the string starts with the pattern `prefix`, `Some` is returned with the substring where
/// the prefix is removed. Unlike `trim_start_matches`, this method removes the prefix exactly
/// once.
pub fn strip_prefix<'a, P: Pattern<'a>>(&'a self, prefix: P) -> Option<&'a str>;
/// Returns a string slice with the suffix removed.
///
/// If the string ends with the pattern `suffix`, `Some` is returned with the substring where
/// the suffix is removed. Unlike `trim_end_matches`, this method removes the suffix exactly
/// once.
pub fn strip_suffix<'a, P>(&'a self, suffix: P) -> Option<&'a str>
where
P: Pattern<'a>,
<P as Pattern<'a>>::Searcher: ReverseSearcher<'a>;
}
```
Closes #67302
This takes an absolute path to a rustc repo and adds path-dependencies
that point towards the respective rustc subcrates into the Cargo.tomls of
the clippy and clippy_lints crate.
This allows rustc-analyzer to show proper type annotations etc on rustc-internals inside the clippy repo.
Usage: cargo dev ra-setup /absolute/path/to/rust/
cc https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3517
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5514
Extend useless conversion
This PR extends `useless_conversion` lint with `TryFrom` and `TryInto`
fixes: #5344
changelog: Extend `useless_conversion` with `TryFrom` and `TryInto`
Register redundant_field_names and non_expressive_names as early passes
Similar names was moved to a pre-expansion pass to solve #2927, so I'm avoiding linting on code from expansion, which makes the dogfood (mostly, see below) pass.
I had to change new_without_default though, and although I understand why it was not triggering before, TBH I don't see why the binding inside the nested `if_chain` is being linted now. Any ideas? (it seems legit though as the code can be changed by the user)
changelog: Register redundant_field_names and non_expressive_names as early passes
Fixes#5356Fixes#5521
