The first six commits are from an earlier PR (#19858) and have already been reviewed. This PR makes an awful hack in the compiler to accommodate slices both natively and in the index a range form. After a snapshot we can hopefully add the new Index impls and then we can remove these awful hacks.
r? @nikomatsakis (or anyone who knows the compiler, really)
This commit performs a second pass for stabilization over the `std::ptr` module.
The specific actions taken were:
* The `RawPtr` trait was renamed to `PtrExt`
* The `RawMutPtr` trait was renamed to `PtrMutExt`
* The module name `ptr` is now stable.
* These functions were all marked `#[stable]` with no modification:
* `null`
* `null_mut`
* `swap`
* `replace`
* `read`
* `write`
* `PtrExt::is_null`
* `PtrExt::is_not_null`
* `PtrExt::offset`
* These functions remain unstable:
* `as_ref`, `as_mut` - the return value of an `Option` is not fully expressive
as null isn't the only bad value, and it's unclear
whether we want to commit to these functions at this
time. The reference/lifetime semantics as written are
also problematic in how they encourage arbitrary
lifetimes.
* `zero_memory` - This function is currently not used at all in the
distribution, and in general it plays a broader role in the
"working with unsafe pointers" story. This story is not yet
fully developed, so at this time the function remains
unstable for now.
* `read_and_zero` - This function remains unstable for largely the same
reasons as `zero_memory`.
* These functions are now all deprecated:
* `PtrExt::null` - call `ptr::null` or `ptr::null_mut` instead.
* `PtrExt::to_uint` - use an `as` expression instead.
[breaking-change]
The `mut` in slices is now redundant. Mutability is 'inferred' from position. This means that if mutability is only obvious from the type, you will need to use explicit calls to the slicing methods.
This commit performs a second pass for stabilization over the `std::ptr` module.
The specific actions taken were:
* The `RawPtr` trait was renamed to `PtrExt`
* The `RawMutPtr` trait was renamed to `MutPtrExt`
* The module name `ptr` is now stable.
* These functions were all marked `#[stable]` with no modification:
* `null`
* `null_mut`
* `swap`
* `replace`
* `read`
* `write`
* `PtrExt::is_null`
* `PtrExt::offset`
* These functions remain unstable:
* `as_ref`, `as_mut` - the return value of an `Option` is not fully expressive
as null isn't the only bad value, and it's unclear
whether we want to commit to these functions at this
time. The reference/lifetime semantics as written are
also problematic in how they encourage arbitrary
lifetimes.
* `zero_memory` - This function is currently not used at all in the
distribution, and in general it plays a broader role in the
"working with unsafe pointers" story. This story is not yet
fully developed, so at this time the function remains
unstable for now.
* `read_and_zero` - This function remains unstable for largely the same
reasons as `zero_memory`.
* These functions are now all deprecated:
* `PtrExt::null` - call `ptr::null` or `ptr::null_mut` instead.
* `PtrExt::to_uint` - use an `as` expression instead.
* `PtrExt::is_not_null` - use `!p.is_null()` instead.
More work on opt-in built in traits. `Send` and `Sync` are not opt-in, `OwnedPtr` renamed to `UniquePtr` and the `Send` and `Sync` traits are now unsafe.
NOTE: This likely needs to be rebased on top of the yet-to-land snapshot.
r? @nikomatsakis
cc #13231
Various refactorings simplifying the mem-categorization and regionck interface. This is working towards an improvement for closure-and-upvar-mode inference.
r? @eddyb
There is also some work here to make resolve a bit more stable - it no longer overwrites a specific import with a glob import.
[breaking-change]
Import shadowing of single/list imports by globs is now forbidden. An interesting case is where a glob import imports a re-export (`pub use`) of a single import. This still counts as a single import for the purposes of shadowing .You can usually fix any bustage by re-ordering such imports. A single import may still shadow (override) a glob import or the prelude.
... really this time `:)`
I went for the simpler fix after all since it turned out to become a bit too complicated to extract the current iteration value from its containing `Option` with the different memory layouts it can have. It's also what we already do for match bindings.
I also extended the new test case to include the "simple identifier" case.
Fixes#20127, fixes#19732
The previous behaviour of using the smallest type possible caused LLVM
to treat padding too conservatively, causing poor codegen. This commit
changes the behaviour to use an alignment-sized integer as the
discriminant. This keeps types the same size, but helps LLVM understand
the data structure a little better, resulting in better codegen.
The previous behaviour of using the smallest type possible caused LLVM
to treat padding too conservatively, causing poor codegen. This commit
changes the behaviour to use an type-alignment-sized integer as the
discriminant. This keeps types the same size, but helps LLVM understand
the data structure a little better, resulting in better codegen.
post-unboxed-closure-conversion. This requires a fair amount of
annoying coercions because all the `map` etc types are defined
generically over the `F`, so the automatic coercions don't propagate;
this is compounded by the need to use `let` and not `as` due to
stage0. That said, this pattern is to a large extent temporary and
unusual.
Back when for-loop iteration variables were just de-sugared into `let` bindings, debuginfo for them was created like for any other `let` binding. When the implementation approach for for-loops changed, we ceased having debuginfo for the iteration variable. This PR fixes this omission and adds a more prominent test case for it.
Also contains some minor, general cleanup of the debuginfo module.
Fixes#19732
#16081 fixed an issue where a nested return statement would cause incorrect behaviour due to the inner return writing over the return stack slot that had already been written too. However, the check was very broad and picked many cases that wouldn't ever be affected by this issue.
As a result, the number of allocas increased dramatically and therefore stack-size increased. LLVM is not able to remove all of the extraneous allocas. Any code that had multiple return values in a compound expression at the end of a function (including loops) would be hit by the issue.
The check now uses a control-flow graph to only consider the case when the inner return is executed conditionally. By itself, this narrowed definition causes #15763 to return, so the control-flow graph is also used to avoid passing the return slot as a destination when the result won't be used.
This change allows the stack-size of the main rustc task to be reduced to 8MB from 32MB.
followed by a semicolon.
This allows code like `vec![1i, 2, 3].len();` to work.
This breaks code that uses macros as statements without putting
semicolons after them, such as:
fn main() {
...
assert!(a == b)
assert!(c == d)
println(...);
}
It also breaks code that uses macros as items without semicolons:
local_data_key!(foo)
fn main() {
println("hello world")
}
Add semicolons to fix this code. Those two examples can be fixed as
follows:
fn main() {
...
assert!(a == b);
assert!(c == d);
println(...);
}
local_data_key!(foo);
fn main() {
println("hello world")
}
RFC #378.
Closes#18635.
[breaking-change]
This narrows the definition of nested returns such that only when the
outer return has a chance of being executed (due to the inner return
being conditional) do we mark the function as having nested returns.
Fixes#19684
per rfc 459
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19390
One question is: should we start by warning, and only switch to hard error later? I think we discussed something like this in the meeting.
r? @alexcrichton
- The following operator traits now take their arguments by value: `Add`, `Sub`, `Mul`, `Div`, `Rem`, `BitAnd`, `BitOr`, `BitXor`, `Shl`, `Shr`. This breaks all existing implementations of these traits.
- The binary operation `a OP b` now "desugars" to `OpTrait::op_method(a, b)` and consumes both arguments.
- `String` and `Vec` addition have been changed to reuse the LHS owned value, and to avoid internal cloning. Only the following asymmetric operations are available: `String + &str` and `Vec<T> + &[T]`, which are now a short-hand for the "append" operation.
[breaking-change]
---
This passes `make check` locally. I haven't touch the unary operators in this PR, but converting them to by value should be very similar to this PR. I can work on them after this gets the thumbs up.
@nikomatsakis r? the compiler changes
@aturon r? the library changes. I think the only controversial bit is the semantic change of the `Vec`/`String` `Add` implementation.
cc #19148
This patch does not itself enable generalized where clauses, but it lays the groundwork. Rather than storing a list of bounds per type parameter, the trait selection and other logic is now driven by a unified list of predicates. All predicate handling is now driven through a common interface. This also fixes a number of bugs where region predicates were being dropped on the floor. As a drive-by, this patch also fixes some bugs in the opt-out-copy feature flag.
That said, this patch does not change the parser or AST in any way, so we still *generate* the list of predicates by walking a list of bounds (and we still *store* the bounds on the `TypeParameterDef` and so on). Those will get patched in a follow-up.
The commits in this case are standalone; the first few are simple refactorings.
r? @nick29581
cc @aturon
in most cases, just the error message changed, but in some cases we
are reporting new errors that OUGHT to have been reported before but
we're overlooked (mostly involving the `'static` bound on `Send`).
These probably happened during the merge of the commit that made `Copy` opt-in.
Also, convert the last occurence of `/**` to `///` in `src/libstd/num/strconv.rs`
This detects (a subset of) the cases when `transmute::<T, U>(x)` can be
lowered to a direct `bitcast T x to U` in LLVM. This assists with
efficiently handling a SIMD vector as multiple different types,
e.g. swapping bytes/words/double words around inside some larger vector
type.
C compilers like GCC and Clang handle integer vector types as `__m128i`
for all widths, and implicitly insert bitcasts as required. This patch
allows Rust to express this, even if it takes a bit of `unsafe`, whereas
previously it was impossible to do at all without inline assembly.
Example:
pub fn reverse_u32s(u: u64x2) -> u64x2 {
unsafe {
let tmp = mem::transmute::<_, u32x4>(u);
let swapped = u32x4(tmp.3, tmp.2, tmp.1, tmp.0);
mem::transmute::<_, u64x2>(swapped)
}
}
Compiling with `--opt-level=3` gives:
Before
define <2 x i64> @_ZN12reverse_u32s20hbdb206aba18a03d8tbaE(<2 x i64>) unnamed_addr #0 {
entry-block:
%1 = bitcast <2 x i64> %0 to i128
%u.0.extract.trunc = trunc i128 %1 to i32
%u.4.extract.shift = lshr i128 %1, 32
%u.4.extract.trunc = trunc i128 %u.4.extract.shift to i32
%u.8.extract.shift = lshr i128 %1, 64
%u.8.extract.trunc = trunc i128 %u.8.extract.shift to i32
%u.12.extract.shift = lshr i128 %1, 96
%u.12.extract.trunc = trunc i128 %u.12.extract.shift to i32
%2 = insertelement <4 x i32> undef, i32 %u.12.extract.trunc, i64 0
%3 = insertelement <4 x i32> %2, i32 %u.8.extract.trunc, i64 1
%4 = insertelement <4 x i32> %3, i32 %u.4.extract.trunc, i64 2
%5 = insertelement <4 x i32> %4, i32 %u.0.extract.trunc, i64 3
%6 = bitcast <4 x i32> %5 to <2 x i64>
ret <2 x i64> %6
}
_ZN12reverse_u32s20hbdb206aba18a03d8tbaE:
.cfi_startproc
movd %xmm0, %rax
punpckhqdq %xmm0, %xmm0
movd %xmm0, %rcx
movq %rcx, %rdx
shrq $32, %rdx
movq %rax, %rsi
shrq $32, %rsi
movd %eax, %xmm0
movd %ecx, %xmm1
punpckldq %xmm0, %xmm1
movd %esi, %xmm2
movd %edx, %xmm0
punpckldq %xmm2, %xmm0
punpckldq %xmm1, %xmm0
retq
After
define <2 x i64> @_ZN12reverse_u32s20hbdb206aba18a03d8tbaE(<2 x i64>) unnamed_addr #0 {
entry-block:
%1 = bitcast <2 x i64> %0 to <4 x i32>
%2 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 3, i32 2, i32 1, i32 0>
%3 = bitcast <4 x i32> %2 to <2 x i64>
ret <2 x i64> %3
}
_ZN12reverse_u32s20hbdb206aba18a03d8tbaE:
.cfi_startproc
pshufd $27, %xmm0, %xmm0
retq
These probably happened during the merge of the commit that made `Copy` opt-in.
Also, convert the last occurence of `/**` to `///` in `src/libstd/num/strconv.rs`
This change makes the compiler no longer infer whether types (structures
and enumerations) implement the `Copy` trait (and thus are implicitly
copyable). Rather, you must implement `Copy` yourself via `impl Copy for
MyType {}`.
A new warning has been added, `missing_copy_implementations`, to warn
you if a non-generic public type has been added that could have
implemented `Copy` but didn't.
For convenience, you may *temporarily* opt out of this behavior by using
`#![feature(opt_out_copy)]`. Note though that this feature gate will never be
accepted and will be removed by the time that 1.0 is released, so you should
transition your code away from using it.
This breaks code like:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
Change this code to:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
impl Copy for Point2D {}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
This is the backwards-incompatible part of #13231.
Part of RFC #3.
[breaking-change]
Now that we have an overloaded comparison (`==`) operator, and that `Vec`/`String` deref to `[T]`/`str` on method calls, many `as_slice()`/`as_mut_slice()`/`to_string()` calls have become redundant. This patch removes them. These were the most common patterns:
- `assert_eq(test_output.as_slice(), "ground truth")` -> `assert_eq(test_output, "ground truth")`
- `assert_eq(test_output, "ground truth".to_string())` -> `assert_eq(test_output, "ground truth")`
- `vec.as_mut_slice().sort()` -> `vec.sort()`
- `vec.as_slice().slice(from, to)` -> `vec.slice(from_to)`
---
Note that e.g. `a_string.push_str(b_string.as_slice())` has been left untouched in this PR, since we first need to settle down whether we want to favor the `&*b_string` or the `b_string[]` notation.
This is rebased on top of #19167
cc @alexcrichton @aturon
