normalize_projection_ty
is not used with next-solver
This commit is contained in:
parent
399a258f46
commit
df55f56283
@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ fn normalize_projection_ty<'tcx>(
|
|||||||
goal: CanonicalProjectionGoal<'tcx>,
|
goal: CanonicalProjectionGoal<'tcx>,
|
||||||
) -> Result<&'tcx Canonical<'tcx, QueryResponse<'tcx, NormalizationResult<'tcx>>>, NoSolution> {
|
) -> Result<&'tcx Canonical<'tcx, QueryResponse<'tcx, NormalizationResult<'tcx>>>, NoSolution> {
|
||||||
debug!("normalize_provider(goal={:#?})", goal);
|
debug!("normalize_provider(goal={:#?})", goal);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
tcx.infer_ctxt().enter_canonical_trait_query(
|
tcx.infer_ctxt().enter_canonical_trait_query(
|
||||||
&goal,
|
&goal,
|
||||||
|ocx, ParamEnvAnd { param_env, value: goal }| {
|
|ocx, ParamEnvAnd { param_env, value: goal }| {
|
||||||
|
debug_assert!(!ocx.infcx.next_trait_solver());
|
||||||
let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::new(ocx.infcx);
|
let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::new(ocx.infcx);
|
||||||
let cause = ObligationCause::dummy();
|
let cause = ObligationCause::dummy();
|
||||||
let mut obligations = vec![];
|
let mut obligations = vec![];
|
||||||
@ -45,23 +45,22 @@ fn normalize_projection_ty<'tcx>(
|
|||||||
// are recursive (given some generic parameters of the opaque's type variables).
|
// are recursive (given some generic parameters of the opaque's type variables).
|
||||||
// In that case, we may only realize a cycle error when calling
|
// In that case, we may only realize a cycle error when calling
|
||||||
// `normalize_erasing_regions` in mono.
|
// `normalize_erasing_regions` in mono.
|
||||||
if !ocx.infcx.next_trait_solver() {
|
let errors = ocx.select_where_possible();
|
||||||
let errors = ocx.select_where_possible();
|
if !errors.is_empty() {
|
||||||
if !errors.is_empty() {
|
// Rustdoc may attempt to normalize type alias types which are not
|
||||||
// Rustdoc may attempt to normalize type alias types which are not
|
// well-formed. Rustdoc also normalizes types that are just not
|
||||||
// well-formed. Rustdoc also normalizes types that are just not
|
// well-formed, since we don't do as much HIR analysis (checking
|
||||||
// well-formed, since we don't do as much HIR analysis (checking
|
// that impl vars are constrained by the signature, for example).
|
||||||
// that impl vars are constrained by the signature, for example).
|
if !tcx.sess.opts.actually_rustdoc {
|
||||||
if !tcx.sess.opts.actually_rustdoc {
|
for error in &errors {
|
||||||
for error in &errors {
|
if let FulfillmentErrorCode::Cycle(cycle) = &error.code {
|
||||||
if let FulfillmentErrorCode::Cycle(cycle) = &error.code {
|
ocx.infcx.err_ctxt().report_overflow_obligation_cycle(cycle);
|
||||||
ocx.infcx.err_ctxt().report_overflow_obligation_cycle(cycle);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return Err(NoSolution);
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
return Err(NoSolution);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// FIXME(associated_const_equality): All users of normalize_projection_ty expected
|
// FIXME(associated_const_equality): All users of normalize_projection_ty expected
|
||||||
// a type, but there is the possibility it could've been a const now. Maybe change
|
// a type, but there is the possibility it could've been a const now. Maybe change
|
||||||
// it to a Term later?
|
// it to a Term later?
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user