lower evaluate_goal stability check to warn

This commit is contained in:
lcnr 2023-08-08 16:28:56 +02:00
parent 9eeaf1fd13
commit 51762886f6
2 changed files with 56 additions and 36 deletions

View File

@ -388,44 +388,60 @@ fn evaluate_goal(
&& is_normalizes_to_hack == IsNormalizesToHack::No
&& !self.search_graph.in_cycle()
{
debug!("rerunning goal to check result is stable");
// The nested evaluation has to happen with the original state
// of `encountered_overflow`.
let from_original_evaluation =
self.search_graph.reset_encountered_overflow(encountered_overflow);
self.check_evaluate_goal_stable_result(goal, canonical_goal, canonical_response);
// In case the evaluation was unstable, we manually make sure that this
// debug check does not influence the result of the parent goal.
self.search_graph.reset_encountered_overflow(from_original_evaluation);
}
Ok((has_changed, certainty, nested_goals))
}
fn check_evaluate_goal_stable_result(
&mut self,
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
original_input: CanonicalInput<'tcx>,
original_result: CanonicalResponse<'tcx>,
) {
let (_orig_values, canonical_goal) = self.canonicalize_goal(goal);
let Ok(new_canonical_response) = EvalCtxt::evaluate_canonical_goal(
let result = EvalCtxt::evaluate_canonical_goal(
self.tcx(),
self.search_graph,
canonical_goal,
// FIXME(-Ztrait-solver=next): we do not track what happens in `evaluate_canonical_goal`
&mut ProofTreeBuilder::new_noop(),
) else {
bug!(
"goal went from {certainty:?} to error: re-canonicalized goal={canonical_goal:#?} \
first_response={canonical_response:#?},
second response was error"
);
};
macro_rules! fail {
($msg:expr) => {{
let msg = $msg;
warn!(
"unstable result: {msg}\n\
original goal: {original_input:?},\n\
original result: {original_result:?}\n\
re-canonicalized goal: {canonical_goal:?}\n\
second response: {result:?}"
);
return;
}};
}
let Ok(new_canonical_response) = result else { fail!("second response was error") };
// We only check for modulo regions as we convert all regions in
// the input to new existentials, even if they're expected to be
// `'static` or a placeholder region.
if !new_canonical_response.value.var_values.is_identity_modulo_regions() {
bug!(
"unstable result: re-canonicalized goal={canonical_goal:#?} \
first_response={canonical_response:#?} \
second_response={new_canonical_response:#?}"
);
fail!("additional constraints from second response")
}
if certainty != new_canonical_response.value.certainty {
bug!(
"unstable certainty: {certainty:#?} re-canonicalized goal={canonical_goal:#?} \
first_response={canonical_response:#?} \
second_response={new_canonical_response:#?}"
);
if original_result.value.certainty != new_canonical_response.value.certainty {
fail!("unstable certainty")
}
}
Ok((has_changed, certainty, nested_goals))
}
fn compute_goal(&mut self, goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
let Goal { param_env, predicate } = goal;
let kind = predicate.kind();

View File

@ -134,9 +134,13 @@ pub(super) fn encountered_overflow(&self) -> bool {
/// Resets `encountered_overflow` of the current goal.
///
/// This should only be used for the check in `evaluate_goal`.
pub(super) fn reset_encountered_overflow(&mut self, encountered_overflow: bool) {
if encountered_overflow {
self.stack.raw.last_mut().unwrap().encountered_overflow = true;
pub(super) fn reset_encountered_overflow(&mut self, encountered_overflow: bool) -> bool {
if let Some(last) = self.stack.raw.last_mut() {
let prev = last.encountered_overflow;
last.encountered_overflow = encountered_overflow;
prev
} else {
false
}
}