2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
use if_chain::if_chain;
|
2018-12-29 09:04:45 -06:00
|
|
|
use rustc::hir::*;
|
2019-02-25 06:40:28 -06:00
|
|
|
use rustc::lint::{in_external_macro, LateContext, LateLintPass, LintArray, LintContext, LintPass};
|
2019-03-18 06:43:10 -05:00
|
|
|
use rustc::ty::{self, Ty};
|
2019-04-08 15:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
use rustc::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
|
2018-12-29 09:04:45 -06:00
|
|
|
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
|
2015-07-26 09:53:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-30 19:15:29 -06:00
|
|
|
use crate::utils::{is_adjusted, iter_input_pats, snippet_opt, span_lint_and_then, type_is_unsafe_function};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-28 08:24:26 -05:00
|
|
|
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
2019-03-05 10:50:33 -06:00
|
|
|
/// **What it does:** Checks for closures which just call another function where
|
|
|
|
/// the function can be called directly. `unsafe` functions or calls where types
|
|
|
|
/// get adjusted are ignored.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// **Why is this bad?** Needlessly creating a closure adds code for no benefit
|
|
|
|
/// and gives the optimizer more work.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// **Known problems:** If creating the closure inside the closure has a side-
|
|
|
|
/// effect then moving the closure creation out will change when that side-
|
|
|
|
/// effect runs.
|
2019-01-30 19:15:29 -06:00
|
|
|
/// See rust-lang/rust-clippy#1439 for more details.
|
2019-03-05 10:50:33 -06:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// **Example:**
|
2019-03-10 17:01:56 -05:00
|
|
|
/// ```rust,ignore
|
2019-03-05 10:50:33 -06:00
|
|
|
/// xs.map(|x| foo(x))
|
|
|
|
/// ```
|
|
|
|
/// where `foo(_)` is a plain function that takes the exact argument type of
|
|
|
|
/// `x`.
|
2016-08-06 03:18:36 -05:00
|
|
|
pub REDUNDANT_CLOSURE,
|
2018-03-28 08:24:26 -05:00
|
|
|
style,
|
2019-01-30 19:15:29 -06:00
|
|
|
"redundant closures, i.e., `|a| foo(a)` (which can be written as just `foo`)"
|
2016-02-05 17:13:29 -06:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-08 15:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
declare_lint_pass!(EtaReduction => [REDUNDANT_CLOSURE]);
|
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-08 15:43:55 -05:00
|
|
|
impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for EtaReduction {
|
2016-12-07 06:13:40 -06:00
|
|
|
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr) {
|
2019-02-25 06:40:28 -06:00
|
|
|
if in_external_macro(cx.sess(), expr.span) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-08-21 13:44:48 -05:00
|
|
|
match expr.node {
|
2018-11-27 14:14:15 -06:00
|
|
|
ExprKind::Call(_, ref args) | ExprKind::MethodCall(_, _, ref args) => {
|
|
|
|
for arg in args {
|
|
|
|
check_closure(cx, arg)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-14 07:21:05 -05:00
|
|
|
_ => (),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 06:01:12 -05:00
|
|
|
fn check_closure(cx: &LateContext<'_, '_>, expr: &Expr) {
|
2018-07-12 02:30:57 -05:00
|
|
|
if let ExprKind::Closure(_, ref decl, eid, _, _) = expr.node {
|
2018-12-07 18:56:03 -06:00
|
|
|
let body = cx.tcx.hir().body(eid);
|
2017-01-04 17:48:34 -06:00
|
|
|
let ex = &body.value;
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if_chain!(
|
|
|
|
if let ExprKind::Call(ref caller, ref args) = ex.node;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Not the same number of arguments, there is no way the closure is the same as the function return;
|
|
|
|
if args.len() == decl.inputs.len();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Are the expression or the arguments type-adjusted? Then we need the closure
|
|
|
|
if !(is_adjusted(cx, ex) || args.iter().any(|arg| is_adjusted(cx, arg)));
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-13 10:04:56 -06:00
|
|
|
let fn_ty = cx.tables.expr_ty(caller);
|
2019-03-31 07:10:17 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if let ty::FnDef(_, _) = fn_ty.sty;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
if !type_is_unsafe_function(cx, fn_ty);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if compare_inputs(&mut iter_input_pats(decl, body), &mut args.into_iter());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
then {
|
|
|
|
span_lint_and_then(cx, REDUNDANT_CLOSURE, expr.span, "redundant closure found", |db| {
|
|
|
|
if let Some(snippet) = snippet_opt(cx, caller.span) {
|
|
|
|
db.span_suggestion(
|
|
|
|
expr.span,
|
|
|
|
"remove closure as shown",
|
|
|
|
snippet,
|
|
|
|
Applicability::MachineApplicable,
|
|
|
|
);
|
2016-11-16 14:57:56 -06:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
});
|
2016-11-16 14:57:56 -06:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if_chain!(
|
|
|
|
if let ExprKind::MethodCall(ref path, _, ref args) = ex.node;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Not the same number of arguments, there is no way the closure is the same as the function return;
|
|
|
|
if args.len() == decl.inputs.len();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Are the expression or the arguments type-adjusted? Then we need the closure
|
|
|
|
if !(is_adjusted(cx, ex) || args.iter().skip(1).any(|arg| is_adjusted(cx, arg)));
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-10 09:18:02 -05:00
|
|
|
let method_def_id = cx.tables.type_dependent_def_id(ex.hir_id).unwrap();
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
if !type_is_unsafe_function(cx, cx.tcx.type_of(method_def_id));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if compare_inputs(&mut iter_input_pats(decl, body), &mut args.into_iter());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if let Some(name) = get_ufcs_type_name(cx, method_def_id, &args[0]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
then {
|
|
|
|
span_lint_and_then(cx, REDUNDANT_CLOSURE, expr.span, "redundant closure found", |db| {
|
2019-01-27 06:33:56 -06:00
|
|
|
db.span_suggestion(
|
2018-09-18 10:07:54 -05:00
|
|
|
expr.span,
|
|
|
|
"remove closure as shown",
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
format!("{}::{}", name, path.ident.name),
|
2018-09-18 12:01:17 -05:00
|
|
|
Applicability::MachineApplicable,
|
2018-09-18 10:07:54 -05:00
|
|
|
);
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Tries to determine the type for universal function call to be used instead of the closure
|
|
|
|
fn get_ufcs_type_name(
|
|
|
|
cx: &LateContext<'_, '_>,
|
|
|
|
method_def_id: def_id::DefId,
|
|
|
|
self_arg: &Expr,
|
|
|
|
) -> std::option::Option<String> {
|
2019-03-15 17:44:42 -05:00
|
|
|
let expected_type_of_self = &cx.tcx.fn_sig(method_def_id).inputs_and_output().skip_binder()[0];
|
|
|
|
let actual_type_of_self = &cx.tables.node_type(self_arg.hir_id);
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if let Some(trait_id) = cx.tcx.trait_of_item(method_def_id) {
|
2019-03-15 17:44:42 -05:00
|
|
|
if match_borrow_depth(expected_type_of_self, &actual_type_of_self) {
|
2019-03-15 17:43:42 -05:00
|
|
|
return Some(cx.tcx.def_path_str(trait_id));
|
2019-02-26 05:12:27 -06:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cx.tcx.impl_of_method(method_def_id).and_then(|_| {
|
2019-02-26 05:12:27 -06:00
|
|
|
//a type may implicitly implement other type's methods (e.g. Deref)
|
2019-03-15 17:44:42 -05:00
|
|
|
if match_types(expected_type_of_self, &actual_type_of_self) {
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
return Some(get_type_name(cx, &actual_type_of_self));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 06:43:10 -05:00
|
|
|
fn match_borrow_depth(lhs: Ty<'_>, rhs: Ty<'_>) -> bool {
|
2019-03-15 17:44:42 -05:00
|
|
|
match (&lhs.sty, &rhs.sty) {
|
|
|
|
(ty::Ref(_, t1, _), ty::Ref(_, t2, _)) => match_borrow_depth(&t1, &t2),
|
2019-02-26 05:12:27 -06:00
|
|
|
(l, r) => match (l, r) {
|
|
|
|
(ty::Ref(_, _, _), _) | (_, ty::Ref(_, _, _)) => false,
|
|
|
|
(_, _) => true,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 06:43:10 -05:00
|
|
|
fn match_types(lhs: Ty<'_>, rhs: Ty<'_>) -> bool {
|
2019-03-15 17:44:42 -05:00
|
|
|
match (&lhs.sty, &rhs.sty) {
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
(ty::Bool, ty::Bool)
|
|
|
|
| (ty::Char, ty::Char)
|
|
|
|
| (ty::Int(_), ty::Int(_))
|
|
|
|
| (ty::Uint(_), ty::Uint(_))
|
|
|
|
| (ty::Str, ty::Str) => true,
|
|
|
|
(ty::Ref(_, t1, _), ty::Ref(_, t2, _))
|
|
|
|
| (ty::Array(t1, _), ty::Array(t2, _))
|
2019-03-18 06:52:24 -05:00
|
|
|
| (ty::Slice(t1), ty::Slice(t2)) => match_types(t1, t2),
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
(ty::Adt(def1, _), ty::Adt(def2, _)) => def1 == def2,
|
|
|
|
(_, _) => false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 06:43:10 -05:00
|
|
|
fn get_type_name(cx: &LateContext<'_, '_>, ty: Ty<'_>) -> String {
|
2019-03-15 17:44:42 -05:00
|
|
|
match ty.sty {
|
2019-03-15 17:43:42 -05:00
|
|
|
ty::Adt(t, _) => cx.tcx.def_path_str(t.did),
|
2019-03-15 17:44:42 -05:00
|
|
|
ty::Ref(_, r, _) => get_type_name(cx, &r),
|
|
|
|
_ => ty.to_string(),
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn compare_inputs(closure_inputs: &mut dyn Iterator<Item = &Arg>, call_args: &mut dyn Iterator<Item = &Expr>) -> bool {
|
|
|
|
for (closure_input, function_arg) in closure_inputs.zip(call_args) {
|
2019-03-07 14:51:05 -06:00
|
|
|
if let PatKind::Binding(_, _, ident, _) = closure_input.pat.node {
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
// XXXManishearth Should I be checking the binding mode here?
|
|
|
|
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(None, ref p)) = function_arg.node {
|
|
|
|
if p.segments.len() != 1 {
|
|
|
|
// If it's a proper path, it can't be a local variable
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
2017-08-09 02:30:56 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
if p.segments[0].ident.name != ident.name {
|
|
|
|
// The two idents should be the same
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-02-10 05:58:51 -06:00
|
|
|
true
|
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|