rust/clippy_lints/src/eta_reduction.rs

115 lines
4.1 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

2018-11-27 14:14:15 -06:00
use crate::utils::{is_adjusted, iter_input_pats, snippet_opt, span_lint_and_then};
use rustc::hir::*;
use rustc::lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintArray, LintPass};
use rustc::ty;
use rustc::{declare_tool_lint, lint_array};
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
2015-07-26 09:53:11 -05:00
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
pub struct EtaPass;
/// **What it does:** Checks for closures which just call another function where
/// the function can be called directly. `unsafe` functions or calls where types
/// get adjusted are ignored.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Needlessly creating a closure adds code for no benefit
/// and gives the optimizer more work.
///
/// **Known problems:** If creating the closure inside the closure has a side-
/// effect then moving the closure creation out will change when that side-
/// effect runs.
/// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/1439 for more
/// details.
///
/// **Example:**
/// ```rust
/// xs.map(|x| foo(x))
/// ```
2017-08-09 02:30:56 -05:00
/// where `foo(_)` is a plain function that takes the exact argument type of
/// `x`.
2018-03-28 08:24:26 -05:00
declare_clippy_lint! {
pub REDUNDANT_CLOSURE,
2018-03-28 08:24:26 -05:00
style,
"redundant closures, i.e. `|a| foo(a)` (which can be written as just `foo`)"
}
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
impl LintPass for EtaPass {
fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray {
lint_array!(REDUNDANT_CLOSURE)
}
fn name(&self) -> &'static str {
"EtaReduction"
}
}
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for EtaPass {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr) {
2015-08-21 13:44:48 -05:00
match expr.node {
2018-11-27 14:14:15 -06:00
ExprKind::Call(_, ref args) | ExprKind::MethodCall(_, _, ref args) => {
for arg in args {
check_closure(cx, arg)
}
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
},
_ => (),
}
}
}
2018-07-23 06:01:12 -05:00
fn check_closure(cx: &LateContext<'_, '_>, expr: &Expr) {
2018-07-12 02:30:57 -05:00
if let ExprKind::Closure(_, ref decl, eid, _, _) = expr.node {
let body = cx.tcx.hir().body(eid);
let ex = &body.value;
2018-07-12 02:30:57 -05:00
if let ExprKind::Call(ref caller, ref args) = ex.node {
if args.len() != decl.inputs.len() {
// Not the same number of arguments, there
// is no way the closure is the same as the function
return;
}
if is_adjusted(cx, ex) || args.iter().any(|arg| is_adjusted(cx, arg)) {
// Are the expression or the arguments type-adjusted? Then we need the closure
return;
}
2017-01-13 10:04:56 -06:00
let fn_ty = cx.tables.expr_ty(caller);
match fn_ty.sty {
// Is it an unsafe function? They don't implement the closure traits
ty::FnDef(..) | ty::FnPtr(_) => {
let sig = fn_ty.fn_sig(cx.tcx);
if sig.skip_binder().unsafety == Unsafety::Unsafe || sig.skip_binder().output().sty == ty::Never {
return;
}
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
},
_ => (),
}
for (a1, a2) in iter_input_pats(decl, body).zip(args) {
if let PatKind::Binding(.., ident, _) = a1.pat.node {
// XXXManishearth Should I be checking the binding mode here?
2018-07-12 02:30:57 -05:00
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(None, ref p)) = a2.node {
if p.segments.len() != 1 {
// If it's a proper path, it can't be a local variable
return;
}
2018-06-28 08:46:58 -05:00
if p.segments[0].ident.name != ident.name {
// The two idents should be the same
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
return;
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
}
} else {
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
return;
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
}
} else {
return;
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
}
}
2017-08-09 02:30:56 -05:00
span_lint_and_then(cx, REDUNDANT_CLOSURE, expr.span, "redundant closure found", |db| {
if let Some(snippet) = snippet_opt(cx, caller.span) {
db.span_suggestion(
2018-09-18 10:07:54 -05:00
expr.span,
"remove closure as shown",
snippet,
Applicability::MachineApplicable,
2018-09-18 10:07:54 -05:00
);
2017-08-09 02:30:56 -05:00
}
});
2015-05-10 00:09:04 -05:00
}
}
}