rust/clippy_lints/src/redundant_static_lifetimes.rs

120 lines
4.4 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then;
use clippy_utils::source::snippet;
use clippy_utils::{meets_msrv, msrvs};
2020-02-29 21:23:33 -06:00
use rustc_ast::ast::{Item, ItemKind, Ty, TyKind};
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
2020-01-12 00:08:41 -06:00
use rustc_lint::{EarlyContext, EarlyLintPass};
use rustc_semver::RustcVersion;
use rustc_session::{declare_tool_lint, impl_lint_pass};
2018-03-28 08:24:26 -05:00
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// **What it does:** Checks for constants and statics with an explicit `'static` lifetime.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Adding `'static` to every reference can create very
/// complicated types.
///
/// **Known problems:** None.
///
/// **Example:**
2019-03-05 16:23:50 -06:00
/// ```ignore
/// const FOO: &'static [(&'static str, &'static str, fn(&Bar) -> bool)] =
/// &[...]
/// static FOO: &'static [(&'static str, &'static str, fn(&Bar) -> bool)] =
/// &[...]
/// ```
/// This code can be rewritten as
2019-03-05 16:23:50 -06:00
/// ```ignore
/// const FOO: &[(&str, &str, fn(&Bar) -> bool)] = &[...]
/// static FOO: &[(&str, &str, fn(&Bar) -> bool)] = &[...]
/// ```
pub REDUNDANT_STATIC_LIFETIMES,
2018-03-28 08:24:26 -05:00
style,
"Using explicit `'static` lifetime for constants or statics when elision rules would allow omitting them."
}
pub struct RedundantStaticLifetimes {
msrv: Option<RustcVersion>,
}
impl RedundantStaticLifetimes {
#[must_use]
pub fn new(msrv: Option<RustcVersion>) -> Self {
Self { msrv }
}
}
impl_lint_pass!(RedundantStaticLifetimes => [REDUNDANT_STATIC_LIFETIMES]);
impl RedundantStaticLifetimes {
// Recursively visit types
fn visit_type(&mut self, ty: &Ty, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, reason: &str) {
2019-09-27 10:16:06 -05:00
match ty.kind {
// Be careful of nested structures (arrays and tuples)
TyKind::Array(ref ty, _) => {
self.visit_type(&*ty, cx, reason);
},
TyKind::Tup(ref tup) => {
for tup_ty in tup {
self.visit_type(&*tup_ty, cx, reason);
}
},
// This is what we are looking for !
TyKind::Rptr(ref optional_lifetime, ref borrow_type) => {
// Match the 'static lifetime
if let Some(lifetime) = *optional_lifetime {
2019-09-27 10:16:06 -05:00
match borrow_type.ty.kind {
TyKind::Path(..) | TyKind::Slice(..) | TyKind::Array(..) | TyKind::Tup(..) => {
if lifetime.ident.name == rustc_span::symbol::kw::StaticLifetime {
let snip = snippet(cx, borrow_type.ty.span, "<type>");
let sugg = format!("&{}", snip);
2020-04-17 01:09:09 -05:00
span_lint_and_then(
cx,
REDUNDANT_STATIC_LIFETIMES,
lifetime.ident.span,
reason,
|diag| {
diag.span_suggestion(
ty.span,
"consider removing `'static`",
sugg,
Applicability::MachineApplicable, //snippet
);
},
);
}
},
_ => {},
}
}
self.visit_type(&*borrow_type.ty, cx, reason);
},
TyKind::Slice(ref ty) => {
self.visit_type(ty, cx, reason);
},
_ => {},
}
}
}
impl EarlyLintPass for RedundantStaticLifetimes {
2018-07-23 06:01:12 -05:00
fn check_item(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, item: &Item) {
if !meets_msrv(self.msrv.as_ref(), &msrvs::STATIC_IN_CONST) {
return;
}
2019-08-19 11:30:32 -05:00
if !item.span.from_expansion() {
2020-02-23 22:33:04 -06:00
if let ItemKind::Const(_, ref var_type, _) = item.kind {
self.visit_type(var_type, cx, "constants have by default a `'static` lifetime");
2019-08-01 00:09:57 -05:00
// Don't check associated consts because `'static` cannot be elided on those (issue
// #2438)
}
2019-09-27 10:16:06 -05:00
if let ItemKind::Static(ref var_type, _, _) = item.kind {
self.visit_type(var_type, cx, "statics have by default a `'static` lifetime");
}
}
}
extract_msrv_attr!(EarlyContext);
}