rust/tests/ui/transmutability/unions/should_reject_disjoint.rs
Jack Wrenn 1ad218f3af safe transmute: Rename BikeshedIntrinsicFrom to TransmuteFrom
As our implementation of MCP411 nears completion and we begin to
solicit testing, it's no longer reasonable to expect testers to
type or remember `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom`. The name degrades the
ease-of-reading of documentation, and the overall experience of
using compiler safe transmute.

Tentatively, we'll instead adopt `TransmuteFrom`.

This name seems to be the one most likely to be stabilized, after
discussion on Zulip [1]. We may want to revisit the ordering of
`Src` and `Dst` before stabilization, at which point we'd likely
consider `TransmuteInto` or `Transmute`.

[1] https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/216762-project-safe-transmute/topic/What.20should.20.60BikeshedIntrinsicFrom.60.20be.20named.3F
2024-08-27 14:05:54 +00:00

35 lines
855 B
Rust

//! Validity must be satisfiable, even if validity is assumed.
#![crate_type = "lib"]
#![feature(transmutability)]
#![allow(dead_code, incomplete_features, non_camel_case_types)]
mod assert {
use std::mem::{Assume, TransmuteFrom};
pub fn is_maybe_transmutable<Src, Dst>()
where
Dst: TransmuteFrom<Src, { Assume::SAFETY.and(Assume::VALIDITY) }>
{}
}
#[derive(Clone, Copy)] #[repr(u8)] enum Ox00 { V = 0x00 }
#[derive(Clone, Copy)] #[repr(u8)] enum Ox01 { V = 0x01 }
#[derive(Clone, Copy)] #[repr(u8)] enum OxFF { V = 0xFF }
fn test() {
#[repr(C)]
union A {
a: Ox00,
b: OxFF,
}
#[repr(C)]
union B {
c: Ox01,
}
assert::is_maybe_transmutable::<A, B>(); //~ ERROR cannot be safely transmuted
assert::is_maybe_transmutable::<B, A>(); //~ ERROR cannot be safely transmuted
}