rust/src/test/run-pass/issue-16668.rs
Felix S. Klock II 0d5bcb14ad Switched to Box::new in many places.
Many of the modifications putting in `Box::new` calls also include a
pointer to Issue 22405, which tracks going back to `box <expr>` if
possible in the future.

(Still tried to use `Box<_>` where it sufficed; thus some tests still
have `box_syntax` enabled, as they use a mix of `box` and `Box::new`.)

Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181.
2015-03-03 21:05:55 +01:00

35 lines
1.0 KiB
Rust

// Copyright 2014 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
// ignore-pretty
#![allow(unknown_features)]
#![feature(unboxed_closures)]
struct Parser<'a, I, O> {
parse: Box<FnMut(I) -> Result<O, String> + 'a>
}
impl<'a, I: 'a, O: 'a> Parser<'a, I, O> {
fn compose<K: 'a>(mut self, mut rhs: Parser<'a, O, K>) -> Parser<'a, I, K> {
// FIXME (#22405): Replace `Box::new` with `box` here when/if possible.
Parser {
parse: Box::new(move |x: I| {
match (self.parse)(x) {
Ok(r) => (rhs.parse)(r),
Err(e) => Err(e)
}
})
}
}
}
fn main() {}