38d4ac7cea
Discussion previously happened in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43498
41 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
41 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
error: Prefer FxHashMap over HashMap, it has better performance and we don't need any collision prevention in clippy
|
|
--> $DIR/fxhash.rs:7:24
|
|
|
|
|
LL | use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
|
|
| ^^^^^^^ help: use: `FxHashMap`
|
|
|
|
|
= note: `-D clippy::default-hash-types` implied by `-D warnings`
|
|
|
|
error: Prefer FxHashSet over HashSet, it has better performance and we don't need any collision prevention in clippy
|
|
--> $DIR/fxhash.rs:7:33
|
|
|
|
|
LL | use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
|
|
| ^^^^^^^ help: use: `FxHashSet`
|
|
|
|
error: Prefer FxHashMap over HashMap, it has better performance and we don't need any collision prevention in clippy
|
|
--> $DIR/fxhash.rs:10:15
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _map: HashMap<String, String> = HashMap::default();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^ help: use: `FxHashMap`
|
|
|
|
error: Prefer FxHashMap over HashMap, it has better performance and we don't need any collision prevention in clippy
|
|
--> $DIR/fxhash.rs:10:41
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _map: HashMap<String, String> = HashMap::default();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^ help: use: `FxHashMap`
|
|
|
|
error: Prefer FxHashSet over HashSet, it has better performance and we don't need any collision prevention in clippy
|
|
--> $DIR/fxhash.rs:11:15
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _set: HashSet<String> = HashSet::default();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^ help: use: `FxHashSet`
|
|
|
|
error: Prefer FxHashSet over HashSet, it has better performance and we don't need any collision prevention in clippy
|
|
--> $DIR/fxhash.rs:11:33
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _set: HashSet<String> = HashSet::default();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^ help: use: `FxHashSet`
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to 6 previous errors
|
|
|