3aa14e3b2e
In its first step of computing transmutability, `rustc_transmutability` constructs a byte-level representation of type layout (`Tree`). Previously, this representation was computed for ADTs by inspecting the ADT definition and performing our own layout computations. This process was error-prone, verbose, and limited our ability to analyze many types (particularly default-repr types). In this PR, we instead construct `Tree`s from `rustc_target::abi::Layout`s. This helps ensure that layout optimizations are reflected our analyses, and increases the kinds of types we can now analyze, including: - default repr ADTs - transparent unions - `UnsafeCell`-containing types Overall, this PR expands the expressvity of `rustc_transmutability` to be much closer to the transmutability analysis performed by miri. Future PRs will work to close the remaining gaps (e.g., support for `Box`, raw pointers, `NonZero*`, coroutines, etc.).
26 lines
977 B
Plaintext
26 lines
977 B
Plaintext
error[E0412]: cannot find type `Missing` in this scope
|
|
--> $DIR/unknown_src_field.rs:18:27
|
|
|
|
|
LL | #[repr(C)] struct Dst(Missing);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^ not found in this scope
|
|
|
|
error[E0277]: `Src` cannot be safely transmuted into `Dst`
|
|
--> $DIR/unknown_src_field.rs:19:36
|
|
|
|
|
LL | assert::is_transmutable::<Src, Dst>();
|
|
| ^^^ analyzing the transmutability of `Dst` is not yet supported
|
|
|
|
|
note: required by a bound in `is_transmutable`
|
|
--> $DIR/unknown_src_field.rs:12:14
|
|
|
|
|
LL | pub fn is_transmutable<Src, Dst>()
|
|
| --------------- required by a bound in this function
|
|
LL | where
|
|
LL | Dst: BikeshedIntrinsicFrom<Src>
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `is_transmutable`
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
|
|
|
|
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0277, E0412.
|
|
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
|