When writing a pattern to collect multiple entries of a slice in a single binding, it is easy to misremember or typo the appropriate syntax to do so, instead writing the experimental `X..` pattern syntax. When we encounter a resolve error because `X` isn't available, we suggest `X @ ..` as an alternative. ``` error[E0425]: cannot find value `rest` in this scope --> $DIR/range-pattern-meant-to-be-slice-rest-pattern.rs:3:13 | LL | [1, rest..] => println!("{rest:?}"), | ^^^^ not found in this scope | help: if you meant to collect the rest of the slice in `rest`, use the at operator | LL | [1, rest @ ..] => println!("{rest:?}"), | + ``` Fix #88404.
15 lines
401 B
Plaintext
15 lines
401 B
Plaintext
error[E0425]: cannot find value `a` in this scope
|
|
--> $DIR/issue-92100.rs:5:10
|
|
|
|
|
LL | [a.., a] => {}
|
|
| ^ not found in this scope
|
|
|
|
|
help: if you meant to collect the rest of the slice in `a`, use the at operator
|
|
|
|
|
LL | [a @ .., a] => {}
|
|
| +
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to previous error
|
|
|
|
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.
|