Vastly improves coverage spans for macros
Fixes: #84561
This resolves problems where macros like `trace!(...)` would show zero coverage if tracing was disabled, and `assert_eq!(...)` would show zero coverage if the assertion did not fail, because only one coverage span was generated, for the branch.
This PR started with an idea that I could just drop branching blocks with same span as expanded macro. (See the fixed issue for more details.)
That did help, but it didn't resolve everything.
I also needed to add a span specifically for the macro name (plus `!`) to ensure the macro gets coverage even if it's internal expansion adds conditional branching blocks that are retained, and would otherwise drop the outer span. Now that outer span is _only_ the `(argument, list)`, which can safely be dropped now), because the macro name has its own span.
While testing, I also noticed the spanview debug output can cause an ICE on a function with no body. The
workaround for this is included in this PR (separate commit).
r? `@tmandry`
cc? `@wesleywiser`
1c2c6b6700