5c3e01a340
When writing a pattern to collect multiple entries of a slice in a
single binding, it is easy to misremember or typo the appropriate syntax
to do so, instead writing the experimental `X..` pattern syntax. When we
encounter a resolve error because `X` isn't available, we suggest
`X @ ..` as an alternative.
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `rest` in this scope
--> $DIR/range-pattern-meant-to-be-slice-rest-pattern.rs:3:13
|
LL | [1, rest..] => println!("{rest:?}"),
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: if you meant to collect the rest of the slice in `rest`, use the at operator
|
LL | [1, rest @ ..] => println!("{rest:?}"),
| +
```
Fix #88404.
10 lines
285 B
Rust
10 lines
285 B
Rust
fn main() {
|
|
match &[1, 2, 3][..] {
|
|
[1, rest..] => println!("{rest:?}"),
|
|
//~^ ERROR cannot find value `rest` in this scope
|
|
//~| ERROR cannot find value `rest` in this scope
|
|
//~| ERROR `X..` patterns in slices are experimental
|
|
_ => {}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|