ac9dd36856
The only reason to use `abort_if_errors` is when the program is so broken that either: 1. later passes get confused and ICE 2. any diagnostics from later passes would be noise This is never the case for lints, because the compiler has to be able to deal with `allow`-ed lints. So it can continue to lint and compile even if there are lint errors.
161 lines
6.9 KiB
Plaintext
161 lines
6.9 KiB
Plaintext
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:15:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | self.x == other.y && self.y == other.y && self.z == other.z
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `self.x == other.x`
|
|
|
|
|
= note: `-D clippy::suspicious-operation-groupings` implied by `-D warnings`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:28:20
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a < s2.a && s1.a < s2.b
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.b < s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:76:33
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.b + s1.d * s2.d
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c * s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:81:19
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.c + s1.c * s2.c
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.b * s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:81:19
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.c + s1.c * s2.c
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.b * s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:86:19
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a * s2.a + s2.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.c
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.b * s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:91:19
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s1.b + s1.c * s2.c
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.b * s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:96:5
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a * s1.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.c
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.a * s2.a`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:101:33
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s1.c
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c * s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:114:20
|
|
|
|
|
LL | (s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s1.b)
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.b * s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:119:34
|
|
|
|
|
LL | (s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.b + s1.d * s2.d)
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c * s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:124:38
|
|
|
|
|
LL | (s1.a * s2.a) + (s1.b * s2.b) + (s1.c * s2.b) + (s1.d * s2.d)
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c * s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:129:39
|
|
|
|
|
LL | ((s1.a * s2.a) + (s1.b * s2.b) + (s1.c * s2.b) + (s1.d * s2.d))
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c * s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:134:42
|
|
|
|
|
LL | (((s1.a * s2.a) + (s1.b * s2.b)) + ((s1.c * s2.b) + (s1.d * s2.d)))
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c * s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:134:42
|
|
|
|
|
LL | (((s1.a * s2.a) + (s1.b * s2.b)) + ((s1.c * s2.b) + (s1.d * s2.d)))
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c * s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:139:40
|
|
|
|
|
LL | (((s1.a * s2.a) + (s1.b * s2.b) + (s1.c * s2.b)) + (s1.d * s2.d))
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c * s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:144:40
|
|
|
|
|
LL | ((s1.a * s2.a) + ((s1.b * s2.b) + (s1.c * s2.b) + (s1.d * s2.d)))
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c * s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:149:20
|
|
|
|
|
LL | (s1.a * s2.a + s2.b * s2.b) / 2
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.b * s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:154:35
|
|
|
|
|
LL | i32::swap_bytes(s1.a * s2.a + s2.b * s2.b)
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.b * s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:159:29
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a > 0 && s1.b > 0 && s1.d == s2.c && s1.d == s2.d
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c == s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:164:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a > 0 && s1.d == s2.c && s1.b > 0 && s1.d == s2.d
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.c == s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:173:77
|
|
|
|
|
LL | (n1.inner.0).0 == (n2.inner.0).0 && (n1.inner.1).0 == (n2.inner.1).0 && (n1.inner.2).0 == (n2.inner.1).0
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `(n1.inner.2).0 == (n2.inner.2).0`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:187:25
|
|
|
|
|
LL | s1.a <= s2.a && s1.a <= s2.b
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.b <= s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:193:23
|
|
|
|
|
LL | if s1.a < s2.a && s1.a < s2.b {
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `s1.b < s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:200:48
|
|
|
|
|
LL | -(-(-s1.a * -s2.a) + (-(-s1.b * -s2.b) + -(-s1.c * -s2.b) + -(-s1.d * -s2.d)))
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `-s1.c * -s2.c`
|
|
|
|
error: this sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug
|
|
--> $DIR/suspicious_operation_groupings.rs:205:27
|
|
|
|
|
LL | -(if -s1.a < -s2.a && -s1.a < -s2.b { s1.c } else { s2.a })
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `-s1.b < -s2.b`
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to 26 previous errors
|
|
|