Matthias Krüger 2bca5c4fc1
Rollup merge of #130714 - compiler-errors:try-structurally-resolve-const, r=BoxyUwU
Introduce `structurally_normalize_const`, use it in `rustc_hir_typeck`

Introduces `structurally_normalize_const` to typecking to separate the "eval a const" step from the "try to turn a valtree into a target usize" in HIR typeck, where we may still have infer vars and stuff around.

I also changed `check_expr_repeat` to move a double evaluation of a const into a single one. I'll leave inline comments.

r? ```@BoxyUwU```

I hesitated to really test this on the new solver where it probably matters for unevaluated consts. If you're worried about the side-effects, I'd be happy to craft some more tests 😄
2024-09-23 06:45:36 +02:00
..
2024-09-21 13:05:21 +02:00
2024-09-22 10:46:59 -04:00
2024-09-20 09:18:47 +00:00
2024-09-20 10:02:14 -07:00
2024-09-20 10:02:14 -07:00
2024-09-15 09:51:32 +02:00
2024-09-20 10:02:14 -07:00
2024-09-20 10:02:14 -07:00
2024-09-18 16:45:48 -04:00

UI Tests

This folder contains rustc's UI tests.

Test Directives (Headers)

Typically, a UI test will have some test directives / headers which are special comments that tell compiletest how to build and intepret a test.

As part of an on-going effort to rewrite compiletest (see https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/536), a major change proposal to change legacy compiletest-style headers // <directive> to ui_test-style headers //@ <directive> was accepted (see https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/512.

An example directive is ignore-test. In legacy compiletest style, the header would be written as

// ignore-test

but in ui_test style, the header would be written as

//@ ignore-test

compiletest is changed to accept only //@ directives for UI tests (currently), and will reject and report an error if it encounters any comments // <content> that may be parsed as an legacy compiletest-style test header. To fix this, you should migrate to the ui_test-style header //@ <content>.