acca9e3834
The reasons for doing this are: * The model on which linked failure is based is inherently complex * The implementation is also very complex, and there are few remaining who fully understand the implementation * There are existing race conditions in the core context switching function of the scheduler, and possibly others. * It's unclear whether this model of linked failure maps well to a 1:1 threading model Linked failure is often a desired aspect of tasks, but we would like to take a much more conservative approach in re-implementing linked failure if at all. Closes #8674 Closes #8318 Closes #8863
23 lines
582 B
Rust
23 lines
582 B
Rust
// Copyright 2012 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
|
|
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
|
|
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
|
|
//
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
|
|
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
|
|
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
|
|
// except according to those terms.
|
|
|
|
extern mod extra;
|
|
|
|
use std::task;
|
|
|
|
fn f() {
|
|
let _a = ~0;
|
|
fail!();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub fn main() {
|
|
task::spawn(f);
|
|
}
|