rust/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/issue-40221.stderr
Esteban Kuber ab4feea50d Point at uncovered variants in enum definition in note instead of a span_label
This makes the order of the output always consistent:

1. Place of the `match` missing arms
2. The `enum` definition span
3. The structured suggestion to add a fallthrough arm
2022-03-08 00:19:08 +00:00

24 lines
625 B
Plaintext

error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `C(QA)` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-40221.rs:11:11
|
LL | match proto {
| ^^^^^ pattern `C(QA)` not covered
|
note: `P` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-40221.rs:2:5
|
LL | enum P {
| -
LL | C(PC),
| ^ not covered
= note: the matched value is of type `P`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
|
LL ~ P::C(PC::Q) => (),
LL ~ C(QA) => todo!(),
|
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0004`.