rust/tests/ui/intrinsics
Ralf Jung a0215d8e46 Re-do recursive const stability checks
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features

This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.

Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.

The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.

Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00
..
auxiliary
always-extern.rs
always-extern.stderr
always-gets-overridden.rs
bad-intrinsic-monomorphization.rs
bad-intrinsic-monomorphization.stderr
const-eval-select-backtrace-std.rs
const-eval-select-backtrace-std.run.stderr
const-eval-select-backtrace.rs
const-eval-select-backtrace.run.stderr
const-eval-select-bad.rs
const-eval-select-bad.stderr
const-eval-select-stability.rs Re-do recursive const stability checks 2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00
const-eval-select-stability.stderr Re-do recursive const stability checks 2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00
const-eval-select-x86_64.rs
const-eval-select.rs
feature-gate-safe-intrinsic.rs
feature-gate-safe-intrinsic.stderr
incorrect-read_via_copy-defn.rs
incorrect-read_via_copy-defn.stderr
incorrect-transmute.rs
incorrect-transmute.stderr
intrinsic-alignment.rs
intrinsic-assume.rs
intrinsic-atomics-cc.rs
intrinsic-atomics.rs
intrinsic-fmuladd.rs
intrinsic-nearby.rs
intrinsic-raw_eq-const-bad.rs
intrinsic-raw_eq-const-bad.stderr
intrinsic-raw_eq-const.rs
intrinsic-unreachable.rs
intrinsic-volatile.rs
intrinsics-integer.rs
intrinsics-math.rs
issue-28575.rs
issue-28575.stderr
issue-84297-reifying-copy.rs
non-integer-atomic.rs
non-integer-atomic.stderr
not-overridden.rs
not-overridden.stderr
panic-uninitialized-zeroed.rs
reify-intrinsic.rs
reify-intrinsic.stderr
safe-intrinsic-mismatch.effects.stderr
safe-intrinsic-mismatch.rs
safe-intrinsic-mismatch.stock.stderr
unchecked_math_unsafe.rs
unchecked_math_unsafe.stderr
unchecked_math_unstable.rs
unchecked_math_unstable.stderr