rust/clippy_lints/src/ignored_unit_patterns.rs

68 lines
2.3 KiB
Rust

use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_sugg;
use hir::{Node, PatKind};
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
use rustc_hir as hir;
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
use rustc_session::declare_lint_pass;
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for usage of `_` in patterns of type `()`.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// Matching with `()` explicitly instead of `_` outlines
/// the fact that the pattern contains no data. Also it
/// would detect a type change that `_` would ignore.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```no_run
/// match std::fs::create_dir("tmp-work-dir") {
/// Ok(_) => println!("Working directory created"),
/// Err(s) => eprintln!("Could not create directory: {s}"),
/// }
/// ```
/// Use instead:
/// ```no_run
/// match std::fs::create_dir("tmp-work-dir") {
/// Ok(()) => println!("Working directory created"),
/// Err(s) => eprintln!("Could not create directory: {s}"),
/// }
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.73.0"]
pub IGNORED_UNIT_PATTERNS,
pedantic,
"suggest replacing `_` by `()` in patterns where appropriate"
}
declare_lint_pass!(IgnoredUnitPatterns => [IGNORED_UNIT_PATTERNS]);
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for IgnoredUnitPatterns {
fn check_pat(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, pat: &'tcx hir::Pat<'tcx>) {
if pat.span.from_expansion() {
return;
}
match cx.tcx.hir().get_parent(pat.hir_id) {
Node::Param(param) if matches!(cx.tcx.hir().get_parent(param.hir_id), Node::Item(_)) => {
// Ignore function parameters
return;
},
Node::Local(local) if local.ty.is_some() => {
// Ignore let bindings with explicit type
return;
},
_ => {},
}
if matches!(pat.kind, PatKind::Wild) && cx.typeck_results().pat_ty(pat).peel_refs().is_unit() {
span_lint_and_sugg(
cx,
IGNORED_UNIT_PATTERNS,
pat.span,
"matching over `()` is more explicit",
"use `()` instead of `_`",
String::from("()"),
Applicability::MachineApplicable,
);
}
}
}