rust/src/test/run-pass/packed-struct-optimized-enum.rs
Ariel Ben-Yehuda bdb72edb5c make accesses to fields of packed structs unsafe
To handle packed structs with destructors (which you'll think are a rare
case, but the `#[repr(packed)] struct Packed<T>(T);` pattern is
ever-popular, which requires handling packed structs with destructors to
avoid monomorphization-time errors), drops of subfields of packed
structs should drop a local move of the field instead of the original
one.

cc #27060 - this should deal with that issue after codegen of drop glue
is updated.

The new errors need to be changed to future-compatibility warnings, but
I'll rather do a crater run first with them as errors to assess the
impact.
2017-11-26 16:12:42 +02:00

30 lines
1.1 KiB
Rust

// Copyright 2017 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
#[repr(packed)]
struct Packed<T: Copy>(T);
impl<T: Copy> Copy for Packed<T> {}
impl<T: Copy> Clone for Packed<T> {
fn clone(&self) -> Self { *self }
}
fn main() {
let one = (Some(Packed((&(), 0))), true);
let two = [one, one];
let stride = (&two[1] as *const _ as usize) - (&two[0] as *const _ as usize);
// This can fail if rustc and LLVM disagree on the size of a type.
// In this case, `Option<Packed<(&(), u32)>>` was erronously not
// marked as packed despite needing alignment `1` and containing
// its `&()` discriminant, which has alignment larger than `1`.
assert_eq!(stride, std::mem::size_of_val(&one));
}