229 lines
8.5 KiB
Plaintext
229 lines
8.5 KiB
Plaintext
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&boxed_slice[1]`
|
|
|
|
|
note: the lint level is defined here
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:10:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)]
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
= note: `-D clippy::unwrap-used` implied by `-D warnings`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_slice[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_vec[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_vecdeque[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_hashmap[&1]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_btreemap[&1]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:21
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `boxed_slice[1]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:22
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `boxed_slice[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52:10
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_slice[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53:10
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vec[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54:10
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vecdeque[0]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:10
|
|
|
|
|
LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:67:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vec[0..1]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:67:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:68:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vec[0..1]`
|
|
|
|
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:68:17
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
= note: if this value is `None`, it will panic
|
|
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:78:24
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _x: &i32 = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&f[1 + 2]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:81:18
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _x = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap().to_string();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `f[1 + 2]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:84:18
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let _x = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap().abs();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `f[1 + 2]`
|
|
|
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:101:33
|
|
|
|
|
LL | let b = rest.get_mut(linidx(j, k) - linidx(i, k) - 1).unwrap();
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&mut rest[linidx(j, k) - linidx(i, k) - 1]`
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to 30 previous errors
|
|
|