fe5f591257
Add projection obligations when comparing impl too Fixes #115033 In the test, when we ask for WF obligations of `DatasetIter<'a, ArrayBase<D>>`, we get back two important obligations: `[<D as Data>::Elem -> ?1, ?1: 'a]`. If we don't add the projection obligation, `?1` remains unconstrained. An alternative solution would be to use unnormalized obligations, where we only have one relevant obligation: `<D as Data>::Elem: 'a`. This would leave no inference vars unconstrained. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| assembly | ||
| auxiliary | ||
| codegen | ||
| codegen-units | ||
| debuginfo | ||
| incremental | ||
| mir-opt | ||
| pretty | ||
| run-coverage | ||
| run-coverage-rustdoc | ||
| run-make | ||
| run-make-fulldeps | ||
| run-pass-valgrind | ||
| rustdoc | ||
| rustdoc-gui | ||
| rustdoc-js | ||
| rustdoc-js-std | ||
| rustdoc-json | ||
| rustdoc-ui | ||
| ui | ||
| ui-fulldeps | ||
| COMPILER_TESTS.md | ||