64165aac68
Remove or document uses of #[rustc_box] in library r? `@thomcc` Only one of these uses is tested for in the rustc-perf benchmark suite. The impact there on compile time is somewhat dramatic, but I am inclined to make this change as a simplification to the library and wait for people to complain if it explodes their compilation time. I think in the absence of data or reports from users about what code paths really matter, if we are optimizing for compilation time, it's hard to argue against using `#[rustc_box]` everywhere we currently call `Box::new`. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| benches | ||
| src | ||
| tests | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||