rust/crates/syntax/test_data/parser/inline/ok/0151_fn.rast
Aleksey Kladov 2bf81922f7 internal: more reasonable grammar for blocks
Consider these expples

        { 92 }
  async { 92 }
    'a: { 92 }
   #[a] { 92 }

Previously the tree for them were

  BLOCK_EXPR
    { ... }

  EFFECT_EXPR
    async
    BLOCK_EXPR
      { ... }

  EFFECT_EXPR
    'a:
    BLOCK_EXPR
      { ... }

  BLOCK_EXPR
    #[a]
    { ... }

As you see, it gets progressively worse :) The last two items are
especially odd. The last one even violates the balanced curleys
invariant we have (#10357) The new approach is to say that the stuff in
`{}` is stmt_list, and the block is stmt_list + optional modifiers

  BLOCK_EXPR
    STMT_LIST
      { ... }

  BLOCK_EXPR
    async
    STMT_LIST
      { ... }

  BLOCK_EXPR
    'a:
    STMT_LIST
      { ... }

  BLOCK_EXPR
    #[a]
    STMT_LIST
      { ... }
2021-09-26 19:16:09 +03:00

16 lines
321 B
Plaintext

SOURCE_FILE@0..12
FN@0..11
FN_KW@0..2 "fn"
WHITESPACE@2..3 " "
NAME@3..6
IDENT@3..6 "foo"
PARAM_LIST@6..8
L_PAREN@6..7 "("
R_PAREN@7..8 ")"
WHITESPACE@8..9 " "
BLOCK_EXPR@9..11
STMT_LIST@9..11
L_CURLY@9..10 "{"
R_CURLY@10..11 "}"
WHITESPACE@11..12 "\n"