rust/tests/coverage-map/status-quo/abort.rs
Zalathar 3141177995 Copy most of tests/run-coverage into tests/coverage-map/status-quo
The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but
we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by
codegen/LLVM.

If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or
MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as
the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-09-05 11:55:34 +10:00

67 lines
2.5 KiB
Rust

#![feature(c_unwind)]
#![allow(unused_assignments)]
extern "C" fn might_abort(should_abort: bool) {
if should_abort {
println!("aborting...");
panic!("panics and aborts");
} else {
println!("Don't Panic");
}
}
fn main() -> Result<(), u8> {
let mut countdown = 10;
while countdown > 0 {
if countdown < 5 {
might_abort(false);
}
// See discussion (below the `Notes` section) on coverage results for the closing brace.
if countdown < 5 { might_abort(false); } // Counts for different regions on one line.
// For the following example, the closing brace is the last character on the line.
// This shows the character after the closing brace is highlighted, even if that next
// character is a newline.
if countdown < 5 { might_abort(false); }
countdown -= 1;
}
Ok(())
}
// Notes:
// 1. Compare this program and its coverage results to those of the similar tests
// `panic_unwind.rs` and `try_error_result.rs`.
// 2. This test confirms the coverage generated when a program includes `UnwindAction::Terminate`.
// 3. The test does not invoke the abort. By executing to a successful completion, the coverage
// results show where the program did and did not execute.
// 4. If the program actually aborted, the coverage counters would not be saved (which "works as
// intended"). Coverage results would show no executed coverage regions.
// 6. If `should_abort` is `true` and the program aborts, the program exits with a `132` status
// (on Linux at least).
/*
Expect the following coverage results:
```text
16| 11| while countdown > 0 {
17| 10| if countdown < 5 {
18| 4| might_abort(false);
19| 6| }
```
This is actually correct.
The condition `countdown < 5` executed 10 times (10 loop iterations).
It evaluated to `true` 4 times, and executed the `might_abort()` call.
It skipped the body of the `might_abort()` call 6 times. If an `if` does not include an explicit
`else`, the coverage implementation injects a counter, at the character immediately after the `if`s
closing brace, to count the "implicit" `else`. This is the only way to capture the coverage of the
non-true condition.
As another example of why this is important, say the condition was `countdown < 50`, which is always
`true`. In that case, we wouldn't have a test for what happens if `might_abort()` is not called.
The closing brace would have a count of `0`, highlighting the missed coverage.
*/