797 lines
22 KiB
Rust
797 lines
22 KiB
Rust
use clippy_utils::source::{snippet_opt, span_starts_with, walk_span_to_context};
|
||
use clippy_utils::{meets_msrv, msrvs};
|
||
use rustc_hir::{Arm, Expr, ExprKind, Local, MatchSource, Pat};
|
||
use rustc_lexer::{tokenize, TokenKind};
|
||
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
|
||
use rustc_semver::RustcVersion;
|
||
use rustc_session::{declare_tool_lint, impl_lint_pass};
|
||
use rustc_span::{Span, SpanData, SyntaxContext};
|
||
|
||
mod infallible_destructuring_match;
|
||
mod match_as_ref;
|
||
mod match_bool;
|
||
mod match_like_matches;
|
||
mod match_ref_pats;
|
||
mod match_same_arms;
|
||
mod match_single_binding;
|
||
mod match_wild_enum;
|
||
mod match_wild_err_arm;
|
||
mod needless_match;
|
||
mod overlapping_arms;
|
||
mod redundant_pattern_match;
|
||
mod rest_pat_in_fully_bound_struct;
|
||
mod single_match;
|
||
mod wild_in_or_pats;
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for matches with a single arm where an `if let`
|
||
/// will usually suffice.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// Just readability – `if let` nests less than a `match`.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # fn bar(stool: &str) {}
|
||
/// # let x = Some("abc");
|
||
/// // Bad
|
||
/// match x {
|
||
/// Some(ref foo) => bar(foo),
|
||
/// _ => (),
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Good
|
||
/// if let Some(ref foo) = x {
|
||
/// bar(foo);
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
|
||
pub SINGLE_MATCH,
|
||
style,
|
||
"a `match` statement with a single nontrivial arm (i.e., where the other arm is `_ => {}`) instead of `if let`"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for matches with two arms where an `if let else` will
|
||
/// usually suffice.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// Just readability – `if let` nests less than a `match`.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Known problems
|
||
/// Personal style preferences may differ.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// Using `match`:
|
||
///
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # fn bar(foo: &usize) {}
|
||
/// # let other_ref: usize = 1;
|
||
/// # let x: Option<&usize> = Some(&1);
|
||
/// match x {
|
||
/// Some(ref foo) => bar(foo),
|
||
/// _ => bar(&other_ref),
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
///
|
||
/// Using `if let` with `else`:
|
||
///
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # fn bar(foo: &usize) {}
|
||
/// # let other_ref: usize = 1;
|
||
/// # let x: Option<&usize> = Some(&1);
|
||
/// if let Some(ref foo) = x {
|
||
/// bar(foo);
|
||
/// } else {
|
||
/// bar(&other_ref);
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
|
||
pub SINGLE_MATCH_ELSE,
|
||
pedantic,
|
||
"a `match` statement with two arms where the second arm's pattern is a placeholder instead of a specific match pattern"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for matches where all arms match a reference,
|
||
/// suggesting to remove the reference and deref the matched expression
|
||
/// instead. It also checks for `if let &foo = bar` blocks.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// It just makes the code less readable. That reference
|
||
/// destructuring adds nothing to the code.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust,ignore
|
||
/// // Bad
|
||
/// match x {
|
||
/// &A(ref y) => foo(y),
|
||
/// &B => bar(),
|
||
/// _ => frob(&x),
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Good
|
||
/// match *x {
|
||
/// A(ref y) => foo(y),
|
||
/// B => bar(),
|
||
/// _ => frob(x),
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
|
||
pub MATCH_REF_PATS,
|
||
style,
|
||
"a `match` or `if let` with all arms prefixed with `&` instead of deref-ing the match expression"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for matches where match expression is a `bool`. It
|
||
/// suggests to replace the expression with an `if...else` block.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// It makes the code less readable.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # fn foo() {}
|
||
/// # fn bar() {}
|
||
/// let condition: bool = true;
|
||
/// match condition {
|
||
/// true => foo(),
|
||
/// false => bar(),
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
/// Use if/else instead:
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # fn foo() {}
|
||
/// # fn bar() {}
|
||
/// let condition: bool = true;
|
||
/// if condition {
|
||
/// foo();
|
||
/// } else {
|
||
/// bar();
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
|
||
pub MATCH_BOOL,
|
||
pedantic,
|
||
"a `match` on a boolean expression instead of an `if..else` block"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for overlapping match arms.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// It is likely to be an error and if not, makes the code
|
||
/// less obvious.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// let x = 5;
|
||
/// match x {
|
||
/// 1..=10 => println!("1 ... 10"),
|
||
/// 5..=15 => println!("5 ... 15"),
|
||
/// _ => (),
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
|
||
pub MATCH_OVERLAPPING_ARM,
|
||
style,
|
||
"a `match` with overlapping arms"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for arm which matches all errors with `Err(_)`
|
||
/// and take drastic actions like `panic!`.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// It is generally a bad practice, similar to
|
||
/// catching all exceptions in java with `catch(Exception)`
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// let x: Result<i32, &str> = Ok(3);
|
||
/// match x {
|
||
/// Ok(_) => println!("ok"),
|
||
/// Err(_) => panic!("err"),
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
|
||
pub MATCH_WILD_ERR_ARM,
|
||
pedantic,
|
||
"a `match` with `Err(_)` arm and take drastic actions"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for match which is used to add a reference to an
|
||
/// `Option` value.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// Using `as_ref()` or `as_mut()` instead is shorter.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// let x: Option<()> = None;
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Bad
|
||
/// let r: Option<&()> = match x {
|
||
/// None => None,
|
||
/// Some(ref v) => Some(v),
|
||
/// };
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Good
|
||
/// let r: Option<&()> = x.as_ref();
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
|
||
pub MATCH_AS_REF,
|
||
complexity,
|
||
"a `match` on an Option value instead of using `as_ref()` or `as_mut`"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for wildcard enum matches using `_`.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// New enum variants added by library updates can be missed.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Known problems
|
||
/// Suggested replacements may be incorrect if guards exhaustively cover some
|
||
/// variants, and also may not use correct path to enum if it's not present in the current scope.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # enum Foo { A(usize), B(usize) }
|
||
/// # let x = Foo::B(1);
|
||
/// // Bad
|
||
/// match x {
|
||
/// Foo::A(_) => {},
|
||
/// _ => {},
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Good
|
||
/// match x {
|
||
/// Foo::A(_) => {},
|
||
/// Foo::B(_) => {},
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "1.34.0"]
|
||
pub WILDCARD_ENUM_MATCH_ARM,
|
||
restriction,
|
||
"a wildcard enum match arm using `_`"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for wildcard enum matches for a single variant.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// New enum variants added by library updates can be missed.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Known problems
|
||
/// Suggested replacements may not use correct path to enum
|
||
/// if it's not present in the current scope.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # enum Foo { A, B, C }
|
||
/// # let x = Foo::B;
|
||
/// // Bad
|
||
/// match x {
|
||
/// Foo::A => {},
|
||
/// Foo::B => {},
|
||
/// _ => {},
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Good
|
||
/// match x {
|
||
/// Foo::A => {},
|
||
/// Foo::B => {},
|
||
/// Foo::C => {},
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "1.45.0"]
|
||
pub MATCH_WILDCARD_FOR_SINGLE_VARIANTS,
|
||
pedantic,
|
||
"a wildcard enum match for a single variant"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for wildcard pattern used with others patterns in same match arm.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// Wildcard pattern already covers any other pattern as it will match anyway.
|
||
/// It makes the code less readable, especially to spot wildcard pattern use in match arm.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// // Bad
|
||
/// match "foo" {
|
||
/// "a" => {},
|
||
/// "bar" | _ => {},
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Good
|
||
/// match "foo" {
|
||
/// "a" => {},
|
||
/// _ => {},
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "1.42.0"]
|
||
pub WILDCARD_IN_OR_PATTERNS,
|
||
complexity,
|
||
"a wildcard pattern used with others patterns in same match arm"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for matches being used to destructure a single-variant enum
|
||
/// or tuple struct where a `let` will suffice.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// Just readability – `let` doesn't nest, whereas a `match` does.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// enum Wrapper {
|
||
/// Data(i32),
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// let wrapper = Wrapper::Data(42);
|
||
///
|
||
/// let data = match wrapper {
|
||
/// Wrapper::Data(i) => i,
|
||
/// };
|
||
/// ```
|
||
///
|
||
/// The correct use would be:
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// enum Wrapper {
|
||
/// Data(i32),
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// let wrapper = Wrapper::Data(42);
|
||
/// let Wrapper::Data(data) = wrapper;
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
|
||
pub INFALLIBLE_DESTRUCTURING_MATCH,
|
||
style,
|
||
"a `match` statement with a single infallible arm instead of a `let`"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for useless match that binds to only one value.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// Readability and needless complexity.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Known problems
|
||
/// Suggested replacements may be incorrect when `match`
|
||
/// is actually binding temporary value, bringing a 'dropped while borrowed' error.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # let a = 1;
|
||
/// # let b = 2;
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Bad
|
||
/// match (a, b) {
|
||
/// (c, d) => {
|
||
/// // useless match
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Good
|
||
/// let (c, d) = (a, b);
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "1.43.0"]
|
||
pub MATCH_SINGLE_BINDING,
|
||
complexity,
|
||
"a match with a single binding instead of using `let` statement"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for unnecessary '..' pattern binding on struct when all fields are explicitly matched.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// Correctness and readability. It's like having a wildcard pattern after
|
||
/// matching all enum variants explicitly.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # struct A { a: i32 }
|
||
/// let a = A { a: 5 };
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Bad
|
||
/// match a {
|
||
/// A { a: 5, .. } => {},
|
||
/// _ => {},
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Good
|
||
/// match a {
|
||
/// A { a: 5 } => {},
|
||
/// _ => {},
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "1.43.0"]
|
||
pub REST_PAT_IN_FULLY_BOUND_STRUCTS,
|
||
restriction,
|
||
"a match on a struct that binds all fields but still uses the wildcard pattern"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Lint for redundant pattern matching over `Result`, `Option`,
|
||
/// `std::task::Poll` or `std::net::IpAddr`
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// It's more concise and clear to just use the proper
|
||
/// utility function
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Known problems
|
||
/// This will change the drop order for the matched type. Both `if let` and
|
||
/// `while let` will drop the value at the end of the block, both `if` and `while` will drop the
|
||
/// value before entering the block. For most types this change will not matter, but for a few
|
||
/// types this will not be an acceptable change (e.g. locks). See the
|
||
/// [reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/destructors.html#drop-scopes) for more about
|
||
/// drop order.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # use std::task::Poll;
|
||
/// # use std::net::{IpAddr, Ipv4Addr, Ipv6Addr};
|
||
/// if let Ok(_) = Ok::<i32, i32>(42) {}
|
||
/// if let Err(_) = Err::<i32, i32>(42) {}
|
||
/// if let None = None::<()> {}
|
||
/// if let Some(_) = Some(42) {}
|
||
/// if let Poll::Pending = Poll::Pending::<()> {}
|
||
/// if let Poll::Ready(_) = Poll::Ready(42) {}
|
||
/// if let IpAddr::V4(_) = IpAddr::V4(Ipv4Addr::LOCALHOST) {}
|
||
/// if let IpAddr::V6(_) = IpAddr::V6(Ipv6Addr::LOCALHOST) {}
|
||
/// match Ok::<i32, i32>(42) {
|
||
/// Ok(_) => true,
|
||
/// Err(_) => false,
|
||
/// };
|
||
/// ```
|
||
///
|
||
/// The more idiomatic use would be:
|
||
///
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// # use std::task::Poll;
|
||
/// # use std::net::{IpAddr, Ipv4Addr, Ipv6Addr};
|
||
/// if Ok::<i32, i32>(42).is_ok() {}
|
||
/// if Err::<i32, i32>(42).is_err() {}
|
||
/// if None::<()>.is_none() {}
|
||
/// if Some(42).is_some() {}
|
||
/// if Poll::Pending::<()>.is_pending() {}
|
||
/// if Poll::Ready(42).is_ready() {}
|
||
/// if IpAddr::V4(Ipv4Addr::LOCALHOST).is_ipv4() {}
|
||
/// if IpAddr::V6(Ipv6Addr::LOCALHOST).is_ipv6() {}
|
||
/// Ok::<i32, i32>(42).is_ok();
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "1.31.0"]
|
||
pub REDUNDANT_PATTERN_MATCHING,
|
||
style,
|
||
"use the proper utility function avoiding an `if let`"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for `match` or `if let` expressions producing a
|
||
/// `bool` that could be written using `matches!`
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// Readability and needless complexity.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Known problems
|
||
/// This lint falsely triggers, if there are arms with
|
||
/// `cfg` attributes that remove an arm evaluating to `false`.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust
|
||
/// let x = Some(5);
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Bad
|
||
/// let a = match x {
|
||
/// Some(0) => true,
|
||
/// _ => false,
|
||
/// };
|
||
///
|
||
/// let a = if let Some(0) = x {
|
||
/// true
|
||
/// } else {
|
||
/// false
|
||
/// };
|
||
///
|
||
/// // Good
|
||
/// let a = matches!(x, Some(0));
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "1.47.0"]
|
||
pub MATCH_LIKE_MATCHES_MACRO,
|
||
style,
|
||
"a match that could be written with the matches! macro"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for `match` with identical arm bodies.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// This is probably a copy & paste error. If arm bodies
|
||
/// are the same on purpose, you can factor them
|
||
/// [using `|`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/patterns.html#multiple-patterns).
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Known problems
|
||
/// False positive possible with order dependent `match`
|
||
/// (see issue
|
||
/// [#860](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/860)).
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust,ignore
|
||
/// match foo {
|
||
/// Bar => bar(),
|
||
/// Quz => quz(),
|
||
/// Baz => bar(), // <= oops
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
///
|
||
/// This should probably be
|
||
/// ```rust,ignore
|
||
/// match foo {
|
||
/// Bar => bar(),
|
||
/// Quz => quz(),
|
||
/// Baz => baz(), // <= fixed
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
///
|
||
/// or if the original code was not a typo:
|
||
/// ```rust,ignore
|
||
/// match foo {
|
||
/// Bar | Baz => bar(), // <= shows the intent better
|
||
/// Quz => quz(),
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
|
||
pub MATCH_SAME_ARMS,
|
||
pedantic,
|
||
"`match` with identical arm bodies"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
/// ### What it does
|
||
/// Checks for unnecessary `match` or match-like `if let` returns for `Option` and `Result`
|
||
/// when function signatures are the same.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
/// This `match` block does nothing and might not be what the coder intended.
|
||
///
|
||
/// ### Example
|
||
/// ```rust,ignore
|
||
/// fn foo() -> Result<(), i32> {
|
||
/// match result {
|
||
/// Ok(val) => Ok(val),
|
||
/// Err(err) => Err(err),
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// fn bar() -> Option<i32> {
|
||
/// if let Some(val) = option {
|
||
/// Some(val)
|
||
/// } else {
|
||
/// None
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
///
|
||
/// Could be replaced as
|
||
///
|
||
/// ```rust,ignore
|
||
/// fn foo() -> Result<(), i32> {
|
||
/// result
|
||
/// }
|
||
///
|
||
/// fn bar() -> Option<i32> {
|
||
/// option
|
||
/// }
|
||
/// ```
|
||
#[clippy::version = "1.61.0"]
|
||
pub NEEDLESS_MATCH,
|
||
complexity,
|
||
"`match` or match-like `if let` that are unnecessary"
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[derive(Default)]
|
||
pub struct Matches {
|
||
msrv: Option<RustcVersion>,
|
||
infallible_destructuring_match_linted: bool,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
impl Matches {
|
||
#[must_use]
|
||
pub fn new(msrv: Option<RustcVersion>) -> Self {
|
||
Self {
|
||
msrv,
|
||
..Matches::default()
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
impl_lint_pass!(Matches => [
|
||
SINGLE_MATCH,
|
||
MATCH_REF_PATS,
|
||
MATCH_BOOL,
|
||
SINGLE_MATCH_ELSE,
|
||
MATCH_OVERLAPPING_ARM,
|
||
MATCH_WILD_ERR_ARM,
|
||
MATCH_AS_REF,
|
||
WILDCARD_ENUM_MATCH_ARM,
|
||
MATCH_WILDCARD_FOR_SINGLE_VARIANTS,
|
||
WILDCARD_IN_OR_PATTERNS,
|
||
MATCH_SINGLE_BINDING,
|
||
INFALLIBLE_DESTRUCTURING_MATCH,
|
||
REST_PAT_IN_FULLY_BOUND_STRUCTS,
|
||
REDUNDANT_PATTERN_MATCHING,
|
||
MATCH_LIKE_MATCHES_MACRO,
|
||
MATCH_SAME_ARMS,
|
||
NEEDLESS_MATCH,
|
||
]);
|
||
|
||
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for Matches {
|
||
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>) {
|
||
if expr.span.from_expansion() {
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if let ExprKind::Match(ex, arms, source) = expr.kind {
|
||
if !span_starts_with(cx, expr.span, "match") {
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
if !contains_cfg_arm(cx, expr, ex, arms) {
|
||
if source == MatchSource::Normal {
|
||
if !(meets_msrv(self.msrv, msrvs::MATCHES_MACRO)
|
||
&& match_like_matches::check_match(cx, expr, ex, arms))
|
||
{
|
||
match_same_arms::check(cx, arms);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
redundant_pattern_match::check_match(cx, expr, ex, arms);
|
||
single_match::check(cx, ex, arms, expr);
|
||
match_bool::check(cx, ex, arms, expr);
|
||
overlapping_arms::check(cx, ex, arms);
|
||
match_wild_enum::check(cx, ex, arms);
|
||
match_as_ref::check(cx, ex, arms, expr);
|
||
needless_match::check_match(cx, ex, arms, expr);
|
||
|
||
if self.infallible_destructuring_match_linted {
|
||
self.infallible_destructuring_match_linted = false;
|
||
} else {
|
||
match_single_binding::check(cx, ex, arms, expr);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
match_ref_pats::check(cx, ex, arms.iter().map(|el| el.pat), expr);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// These don't depend on a relationship between multiple arms
|
||
match_wild_err_arm::check(cx, ex, arms);
|
||
wild_in_or_pats::check(cx, arms);
|
||
} else {
|
||
if meets_msrv(self.msrv, msrvs::MATCHES_MACRO) {
|
||
match_like_matches::check(cx, expr);
|
||
}
|
||
redundant_pattern_match::check(cx, expr);
|
||
needless_match::check(cx, expr);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn check_local(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, local: &'tcx Local<'_>) {
|
||
self.infallible_destructuring_match_linted |= infallible_destructuring_match::check(cx, local);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn check_pat(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, pat: &'tcx Pat<'_>) {
|
||
rest_pat_in_fully_bound_struct::check(cx, pat);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
extract_msrv_attr!(LateContext);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Checks if there are any arms with a `#[cfg(..)]` attribute.
|
||
fn contains_cfg_arm(cx: &LateContext<'_>, e: &Expr<'_>, scrutinee: &Expr<'_>, arms: &[Arm<'_>]) -> bool {
|
||
let Some(scrutinee_span) = walk_span_to_context(scrutinee.span, SyntaxContext::root()) else {
|
||
// Shouldn't happen, but treat this as though a `cfg` attribute were found
|
||
return true;
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
let start = scrutinee_span.hi();
|
||
let mut arm_spans = arms.iter().map(|arm| {
|
||
let data = arm.span.data();
|
||
(data.ctxt == SyntaxContext::root()).then(|| (data.lo, data.hi))
|
||
});
|
||
let end = e.span.hi();
|
||
|
||
// Walk through all the non-code space before each match arm. The space trailing the final arm is
|
||
// handled after the `try_fold` e.g.
|
||
//
|
||
// match foo {
|
||
// _________^- everything between the scrutinee and arm1
|
||
//| arm1 => (),
|
||
//|---^___________^ everything before arm2
|
||
//| #[cfg(feature = "enabled")]
|
||
//| arm2 => some_code(),
|
||
//|---^____________________^ everything before arm3
|
||
//| // some comment about arm3
|
||
//| arm3 => some_code(),
|
||
//|---^____________________^ everything after arm3
|
||
//| #[cfg(feature = "disabled")]
|
||
//| arm4 = some_code(),
|
||
//|};
|
||
//|^
|
||
let found = arm_spans.try_fold(start, |start, range| {
|
||
let Some((end, next_start)) = range else {
|
||
// Shouldn't happen as macros can't expand to match arms, but treat this as though a `cfg` attribute were
|
||
// found.
|
||
return Err(());
|
||
};
|
||
let span = SpanData {
|
||
lo: start,
|
||
hi: end,
|
||
ctxt: SyntaxContext::root(),
|
||
parent: None,
|
||
}
|
||
.span();
|
||
(!span_contains_cfg(cx, span)).then(|| next_start).ok_or(())
|
||
});
|
||
match found {
|
||
Ok(start) => {
|
||
let span = SpanData {
|
||
lo: start,
|
||
hi: end,
|
||
ctxt: SyntaxContext::root(),
|
||
parent: None,
|
||
}
|
||
.span();
|
||
span_contains_cfg(cx, span)
|
||
},
|
||
Err(()) => true,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Checks if the given span contains a `#[cfg(..)]` attribute
|
||
fn span_contains_cfg(cx: &LateContext<'_>, s: Span) -> bool {
|
||
let Some(snip) = snippet_opt(cx, s) else {
|
||
// Assume true. This would require either an invalid span, or one which crosses file boundaries.
|
||
return true;
|
||
};
|
||
let mut pos = 0usize;
|
||
let mut iter = tokenize(&snip).map(|t| {
|
||
let start = pos;
|
||
pos += t.len;
|
||
(t.kind, start..pos)
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// Search for the token sequence [`#`, `[`, `cfg`]
|
||
while iter.any(|(t, _)| matches!(t, TokenKind::Pound)) {
|
||
let mut iter = iter.by_ref().skip_while(|(t, _)| {
|
||
matches!(
|
||
t,
|
||
TokenKind::Whitespace | TokenKind::LineComment { .. } | TokenKind::BlockComment { .. }
|
||
)
|
||
});
|
||
if matches!(iter.next(), Some((TokenKind::OpenBracket, _)))
|
||
&& matches!(iter.next(), Some((TokenKind::Ident, range)) if &snip[range.clone()] == "cfg")
|
||
{
|
||
return true;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
false
|
||
}
|